E.M. McGale et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 352 (2003) 129Á
/
135
131
2.3. Preparation of {Pt[(h5-CpFe(s,h5-C5H3CH2-
NMe2)](dmso)[4-ethynyl-N-methyl-1,8-
naphthalimide]}
2.5. X-ray data collection, reduction and structure
solution for 5
Crystal data for 5 are given in Table 1. Recrystallisa-
tion from dichloromethane/ethyl acetate layered with
hexane, yielded dark brown plates one of which was
used for data collection. Data was collected at 168 K on
a Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer, processed using
XSCANS [11].
Analysis of the reflection data revealed substantial
twinning in the crystal. A unique cell was subsequently
found and the associated reflections chosen using the
program RLAT [12], these were used in the subsequent
solution and refinement process. The structure was
4-Ethynyl-N-methyl-1,8-naphthalimide (0.055 g, 0.23
mmol) and 1a (0.119 g, 0.22 mmol) were stirred in 20 ml
dried, degassed triethylamine with 5% CuI at r.t. for 24
h. The solvent was removed from the deep redÁbrown
/
reaction mixture under reduced pressure, the resulting
solid dissolved in CH2Cl2 and washed six times with 20
ml H2O to remove any remaining triethylamine. The
solution was then treated with MgSO4, filtered and the
solvent removed in vacuo. Recrystallisation from hot
methanol gave 4 as a dark purpleÁbrown crystalline
/
¯
solved in the non-centric space group P1 by Patterson
methods using SHELXS [13]. Early stages of the refine-
¯
ment indicated that the non-centric alternative P1
solid (0.11 g, 67%). Anal. Calc. for C30H32PtFeN2O3S:
C, 47.94; H, 4.29; N, 3.73; S, 4.27. Found: C, 47.53; H,
4.33; N, 3.77; S, 4.08%. EI MS: m/z 749 [M]ꢀ. 1H
3
NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 3.08 (s, 3H, JPtÁH
¯
would be more appropriate; conversion P1 and full-
ꢂ36 Hz,
/
matrix least-squares refinement using SHELXL-97 [14]
and TITAN2000 [15] revealed all atoms of the two unique
molecules in the triclinic unit cell. Pt, Fe and S atoms
were assigned anisotropic temperature factors and the H
atoms were included in calculated positions with iso-
tropic temperature factors 1.2 times that of Uiso of the
atoms to which they are bound. A number of high peaks
were found in the final difference map close to the heavy
atoms reflecting the lack of absorption corrections on
the data.
NCH3), 3.46 (s, 3H, NCH3), 3.55 (s, 3H, naphthÁ
NCH3), 3.70 (s, 3H, SCH3), 3.76 (s, 3H, SCH3), 3.88
(AB, 2H, JAB
13.8 Hz, NCH2), 4.16 (m, 5H, h5-
C5H5Fe), 4.19 (m, 2H, two of h5-C5H3Fe), 4.42 (m, 1H,
one of h5-C5H3Fe), 7.74 (m, 2H, naphth.), 8.47 [d (Jꢂ
7.8Hz), 1H, naphth.], 8.60 [d (Jꢂ7.2 Hz), 1H, naphth.],
8.78 [d (Jꢂ
7.5 Hz), 1H, naphth.]. 195Pt NMR (CDCl3,
ppm): ꢁ
3717. IR (CH2Cl2, cmꢁ1): nCꢀC 2083, nCꢁO
/
ꢂ
/
/
/
/
/
1694, 1656, nSꢁO 1128. UVÁVis (CH2Cl2; lmax, nm, o l
/
molꢁ1cmꢁ1): 250 (30,300), 284 (17,400), 350 (810), 408
(25,500). Eꢀ/0 (CH2Cl2, V): 0.22.
3. Results and discussion
2.4. Preparation of {Pt[(h5-CpFe(s,h5-
C5H3CH2NMe2)](dmso)[2-ethynyl-anthraquinone]}
Synthetic strategies for the preparation of 2Á
/
5 are
shown in Schemes 1Á3. The synthesis of the ynamine 2
/
was achieved via a CuI-catalysed reaction between 10-
(2-propynyl)-9-acridone and 1a (Scheme 2). This route,
rather than one between 1b and acridone, avoids the
problem of b-adduct formation which are the principal
products with ferrocenyl analogues [6]. Replacement of
2-Ethynyl-anthraquinone (0.112 g, 0.48 mmol) and 1a
(0.266 g, 0.48 mmol) were refluxed in dried, degassed
piperidine (10 ml) with 5% CuI for 5 h. The solvent was
removed under reduced pressure, and the resulting solid
was purified using column chromatography on alumina;
the first band eluted with ethylacetate gave 5 which was
recrystallised in CH2Cl2 layered with hexane (0.145 g,
40%). Anal. Calc. for C31H29FeNO3PtS: C, 49.87; H,
3.92; N, 1.88; S, 4.29. Found: C, 49.86; H, 3.92; N, 2.01;
the dmso ligand in the trans PtÁN position by the
/
stronger p-acceptor PPh3 gave 3. Only ynamine com-
plexes of acridone were accessible as attempts to prepare
a 2-ethynylacridone derivative via coupling reactions of
1b with 2-iodoacridone were unsuccessful. However,
Sonogashira coupling reactions were a convenient, high-
S, 3.96%. ES MS: m/z 746 [M]ꢀ (74%) 745 [Mꢁ
/
H]ꢀ
(100%). H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 2.89 (s, 3H, JPtÁH
18 Hz, NCH3), 3.22 (s, 3H, 3JPtÁH
18 Hz, NCH3), 3.42
1
3
ꢂ
/
ꢂ
/
(s, 3H, SCH3), 3.49 (s, 3H, SCH3), 3.53 (m, 2H, NCH2),
4.15 (s, 5H, C5H5), 4.18 (m, 2H, two of h5-C5H3Fe),
4.43 (m, 1H, one of h5-C5H3Fe), 7.67 (dd, 1H, Jꢂ
/
8, 2
8, 2
Hz, anth.), 8.31 (m, 2H, anth.). 195Pt NMR (CDCl3,
ppm): ꢁ
3699. IR (CH2Cl2, cmꢁ1): nCꢀC 2094, nCꢁO
Hz, anth.), 7.80 (m, 2H, anth.), 8.19 (dd, 2H, Jꢂ
/
/
1673, nSꢁO 1131. UVÁVis (CH2Cl2; lmax, nm, o l
/
molꢁ1cmꢁ1): 305 (25,200), 403 (7000). Eꢀ/0 (CH2Cl2,
V): 0.30.
Scheme 1.