.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 1: Optimization of the reaction conditions for the enantioselective
gold-catalyzed oxidative cyclopropanation.[a]
Entry
L
Conditions
Yield [%][a]
ee [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L2
L2
DCE, RT, 2 h
DCE, RT, 2 h
DCE, RT, 2 h
DCE, RT, 2 h
DCE, RT, 2 h
DCE, RT, 2 h
DCE, RT, 2 h
DCE, RT, 2 h
DCE, RT, 2 h
DCE, RT, 2 h
DCE, RT, 2 h
DCE, 08C, 12 h
DCE, À208C, 50 h
78
78
74
73
78
62
78
56
78
NR
63
86
85
52
50
23
86
73
3
–
–
90
94
Scheme 2. P,N-bidentate ligands: a) design; b) selected ligands.
Bz=benzoyl, TBS=tert-butyldimethylsilyl, TES=triethylsilyl,
TIPS=triisopropylsilyl.
[c]
–
2-bromobenzaldehyde,[6e] was used as the substrate. In the
original study[6e] the desired product 3a was obtained in 67%
yield using [IPrAuNTf2] (5 mol%, generated in situ from
70
68 (61)[d]
[a] The yield was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy using diethyl
phthalate as the internal reference. [b] The ee value was determined by
HPLC on a chiral stationary phase. [c] No desired product was observed
in the crude 1H NMR spectrum. [d] The yield of the isolated product is
given in parentheses.
[IPrAuCl]/AgNTf2;
IPr= N,N’-bis(2,6-
diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene) as the catalyst, 8-
methylquinoline N-oxide (2, 3 equiv) as the oxidant, and
1,2-dichloroethene (DCE) as the solvent and carrying out the
reaction at 808C for 3 h. When the ligand L1 with a bis-TBS-
protected (3S,4S)-3,4-dihydroxypyrrolidine moiety was used,
3a was formed in 78% yield and with an encouraging 63% ee
(Table 1, entry 1). The shown absolute configuration of the
major enantiomer of the product was assigned on the basis of
X-ray diffraction studies of analogues (see below). Notably,
the reaction conditions—the use of 1.5 equivalents of 2 at
ambient temperature—are much milder than those required
for the use of IPr as the ligand, which is consistent with the
previously observed benefits of using P,N-bidentate ligands in
a-oxo gold carbene chemistry.[5a,c,12–14]
After attempts to improve enantioselectivity by replacing
the TBS groups of L1 with other protecting groups were
unsuccessful, we reasoned that (3R,5R)-3,5-dihydroxypiper-
idine, which is based on a conformationally more controllable
six-membered ring, might offer a better platform for ligand
optimization. Thus, the corresponding bis-TBS-substituted
ligand L2 was tested in the reaction. Indeed, the ee value of 3a
improved to 86% (Table 1, entry 2). When the TBS groups of
L2 were replaced with TES groups in L3, little change in
enantioselectivity was detected (Table 1, entry 3). However,
the presence of both bigger TIPS groups and much smaller
Me groups led to significantly decreased enantioselectivity
(Table 1, entries 4 and 5). An even lower ee value of 3a was
observed when the HO groups of the ligand piperidine ring
were converted into benzoate groups in L6 (Table 1, entry 6).
The introduction of a MeO group para to the phosphorus
atom in L2 resulted in the ligand L7, the use of which,
however, led to essentially the same outcome (Table 1,
entry 7). Interestingly, ligand L8 with one TBS group
removed still enabled fairly good enantioselectivity (Table 1,
entry 8): notably better than that observed with the dime-
thoxy ligand L5. Finally, the sterically much smaller diphe-
nylphosphine ligand L9, although still leading to an efficient
intramolecular cyclopropanation, was very poor in promoting
alkene facial selectivity during the reaction (Table 1, entry 9),
thus indicating the importance of the bulky adamantyl groups
in enforcing a tight reaction site for the asymmetric cyclo-
propanation. In contrast to the chiral P,N-ligands, the
spiroketal bisphosphine ligand L10 (Table 1, entry 10),
which was used successfully in gold-catalyzed, highly enan-
tioselective cyclopropanation reactions with diazooxindole
substrates,[4h] and (R)-DTBM-segphos (entry 11), a popular
ligand for asymmetric gold catalysis,[9a,b] did not facilitate the
desired oxidative gold catalysis under the identical reaction
conditions used. The ee value of the product was further
improved by lowering the reaction temperature to 08C
(Table 1, entry 12) and further to À208C (entry 13), albeit at
the expense of the yield and reaction time. Notably, the
reaction temperature of À208C in the last entry is much lower
than the originally used 808C.[6e]
Having optimized the reaction conditions for the highest
possible enantioselectivity (Table 1, entry 13), we subse-
quently examined the reaction scope (Scheme 3). We found
that substituents on the benzene ring were tolerated (products
3b–e). Specifically, a 5-Me group did not affect the reaction
outcome significantly (product 3b). The presence of electron-
withdrawing groups, such as 5-F, 5-CF3, and 4-Cl (products
3c–e), resulted in decreased but serviceable yields, whereas
the ee value of the products remained good to excellent. The
presence of a 4-MeO group, however, resulted in mostly
2
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!