1066
M. C. Wilkinson et al.
LETTER
Representative Experimental Procedure
F3C
O
i) TFAA
80 °C
To a slurry of 4-(methylsulfonyl)phenylacetic acid 1 (5 g, 1 wt) in
toluene (35 mL, 7 vol) was added TFAA (6.39 mL, 2 equiv) and the
solution heated to 80 °C. After 60 min, 3 mol% catalyst (TfOH in
this example) were added, and the solution was stirred at 80 °C until
complete by HPLC analysis (100 min). Industrial methylated spirit
(IMS, 35 mL, 7 vol) was added over 20 min, effecting crystallisa-
tion. The slurry was held at reflux for 1 h, cooled to 20–25 °C over
60 min, then chilled to 0–5 °C. The slurry was stirred for 60 min
then filtered. The solids were washed with IMS (2 × 2 vol) and dried
in vacuo at 50–60 °C to give 2-[4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]-1-p-
tolylethanone 11 as a cream white crystalline solid (5.60 g, 83%).
IR: 3023, 3002, 2924, 1934, 1683, 1294, 1144 cm–1. 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3): d = 2.43 (3 H, s), 3.05 (3 H, s), 4.38 (2 H, s), 7.30 (2
H, d, J = 8 Hz), 7.47 (2 H, d, J = 8 Hz), 7.90 (2 H, d, J = 2 Hz), 7.92
(2 H, d, J = 2 Hz). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 21.74, 44.61,
44.97, 127.68, 128.63, 129.57, 130.72, 133.72, 139.07, 141.15,
O
O
O
5b
+
ii) catalyst,
toluene
MeO2S
MeO2S
12
11
O
O
MeO2S
SO2Me
13
Scheme 6 Formation and reaction of postulated enol acetate.
Spectroscopic evidence (1H NMR) was used to further
support this hypothesis. Analysis of the reaction mixture 144.72, 195.92. LCMS (ES+): m/z (%) = 289 (100) [M + H]+.
HRMS: m/z calcd for C16H17O3S: 289.0898 (DM = 5.0 ppm); found:
at the mid point of the reaction showed olefinic signals at
ca. d = 6.6 ppm which were entirely absent when the reac-
tion had run to completion. Similar enol acetates have
been reported as impurities in previous work.1
289.0913 [M + H]+.
Acknowledgment
It is interesting that the analogous enol acetate is not
formed to the same degree during reactions with anisole.
Alcide Perboni is acknowledged as the source of inspiration for this
work, as well as for initial results. Richard Ward, Roger Barrett,
Presumably, the degree of enol acetate formation reflects Hugh Clark, and Kathy Harwood are thanked for important contri-
butions. Catherine Duckett is thanked for analytical assistance.
the difference in the kinetics of mixed anhydride reacting
with either solvent or initially formed product, with the
difference being accounted for by the reduction in nucleo-
philicity moving from anisole to toluene. Thus, reaction of
mixed anhydride with the initially formed product is fa-
vored in toluene over reaction with solvent.
References and Notes
(1) Veeramaneni, V. R.; Pal, M.; Yeleswarapu, K. R.
Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 3283.
(2) Matsushita, Y.-I.; Sugamoto, K.; Matsui, T. Tetrahedron
Upon complete consumption of the starting material 5b
and intermediate 13, the reaction catalysed by triflic acid
was crystallized with IMS to give an 83% isolated yield.
The reaction catalysed by Yb(OTf)3 was isolated in an
analogous fashion to give an 81% yield.
Lett. 2004, 45, 4723.
(3) Firouzabadi, H.; Iranpoor, N.; Nowrouzi, N. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2003, 44, 5343.
(4) Ranu, B. C.; Ghosh, G.; Jana, U. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
9546.
(5) Lewis acids: TMSOTf, Hf(OTf)4, Yb(OTf)3, Cu(OTf)2,
In(OTf)3, Zn(OTf)2, CuI, TMSI, AlCl3, ZnCl2, TiCl4, BiCl3,
FeCl3, Fe3O4, ZnO, Al2O3, Ti(Oi-Pr)2Cl2, Ti(Oi-Pr)4,
BF3·OEt2, Zn(OAc)2, CeSO4·8H2O, H3(PW12O40), graphite.
Brønsted acids: oxalic acid, trichloroacetic acid, TFA, HCl,
HBr, H2SO4, HNO3, TfOH, H3PO4.
In conclusion we have demonstrated a correlation be-
tween electronic properties of the acid component and
regioselectivity in the substoichiometrically catalysed
Friedel–Crafts acylation. We have applied this reaction to
an improved preparation of a pharmaceutical intermediate
with considerable reduction in resultant waste.
(6) Hansch, C.; Leo, A.; Taft, R. W. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165.
Synlett 2006, No. 7, 1063–1066 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York