Scheme 4
Scheme 3
selectivity was achieved in toluene. Reaction of 1 with
methyllithium in toluene at 260 °C produced a 95 : 5 mixture
of the trans and cis isomers (90% de). This result allowed for a
highly selective synthesis of C2-symmetric Group 4 metal
complexes. The sequence is summarized in Scheme 4 showing
the formation of a chiral racemic zirconium complex 5 with a
90% diastereomeric excess.
In summary, a method for the highly diastereoselective
formation of C2-symmetric racemic diaminoferrocenes is
described. The compounds are obtained through a reaction of
methyllithium with ferrocene bis-imines. Under the optimized
reaction conditions the formation of the trans-diastereomer
proceeded with a 90% diastereomeric excess. The diamino-
ferrocenes thus obtained were subsequently used to generate
C2-symmetric zirconium diamide complexes, whose chemistry
is presently under investigation. Additional work is in progress
to establish the origin of the selectivity of the reduction of bis-
imines with MeLi.
It is important to note that in the case of diamines 3 and 4 the
assignment of diastereoisomers as trans or cis is not straightfor-
5
ward. In each isomer the two (h -C5H4)NCH(Me)(Ar) groups
are related by a symmetry element: a mirror plane in the cis
isomer and a two-fold rotation axis in the trans isomer. The 1H
NMR patterns exhibited by the two diastereomers are, therefore,
indistinguishable.11 The question of the assignment of the major
diastereomer was addressed by the synthesis of zirconium
dibenzyl complexes (Scheme 3). Reaction of diamine 3 with
ZrBn4 afforded the desired zirconium dibenzyl complex
{Fc[NCH(Me)(Ph)]2}ZrBn2 (5) (Scheme 3). As expected, the
1H NMR analysis of the product shows the presence of two
diastereomers in a 90 : 10 ratio. This ratio mirrors the isomer
distribution in diamine 3.
The Cs and the C2 symmetrical zirconium dibenzyl com-
plexes can be easily distinguished by the 1H NMR pattern of the
benzylic methylene protons. In a C2-symmetric compound, the
two benzyl groups are equivalent, but the protons on the same
benzyl group are diastereotopic and appear as two doublets.
Conversely, the two benzyl groups in a Cs-symmetric complex
are distinct, but each group contains a pair of equivalent
benzylic protons (Fig. 2). In this case, the spectrum would
consist of two singlets. The major diastereomer of 5 contains
two doublets at 2.69 and 2.65 ppm (2J = 10.4 Hz) correspond-
ing to the benzylic hydrogen atoms. This pattern identifies this
isomer as the C2-symmetric trans diastereomer. Therefore, the
remaining 10% of the product is the Cs-symmetric cis
We thank the U.S. Department of Energy for funding.
Notes and references
‡ Characterization details for 1, 3, and 5. Compound 1: Mp. 126–128 °C. 1H
NMR (C6D6), d 8.38 (s, 2H, NNCH), 7.68 (m, 4H, o-Ph), 7.10–7.02 (m, 6H,
m-Ph and p-Ph), 4.59 (virt t, 4H, Fc), 4.10 (virt t, 4H, Fc). 13C NMR (C6D6),
d 157.9, 137.4, 130.2, 128.7, 128.3, 106.1 (Fcipso), 68.8 (Fc), 64.8 (Fc).
Anal. Calcd for C24H20FeN2: C, 73.48; H, 5.14; N, 7.14. Found: C, 73.39;
H, 5.16; N, 7.15%. 3: Major product (3-trans): 1H NMR (C6D6), d 7.34 (m,
4H, o-Ph), 7.20 (m, 4H, m-Ph), 7.10 (m, 2, p-Ph), 4.09 (qd, JH–H(Me) = 6.7
Hz, JH–H(NH) = 2.5 Hz, 2H, MeCH), 3.80 (m, 2H, Fc), 3.78 (m, 2H, Fc),
3.66 (m, 2H, Fc), 3.54 (m, 2H, Fc), 2.35 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 2H, NH), 1.19 (d,
J = 6.7 Hz) ppm. 13C{1H} NMR (C6D6), d 146.5, 128.4, 128.2, 126.1,
109.4 (Fcispo), 63.4 (Fc), 63.3 (Fc), 57.6 (Fc), 57.4 (MeCH), 57.10 (Fc), 25.2
(MeCH) ppm. Anal. Calcd for C26H28FeN2: C, 73.59; H, 6.65; N, 6.60.
Found: C, 73.32; H, 6.45; N, 6.78. 5: 1H NMR (only the major trans
diastereomer is described) (C6D6), d 7.25–6.90 (m, 20H, Ar), 4.89 (q, 3J =
6.7 Hz, 2H, NCH), 3.77 (m, 2H, Fc), 3.75 (m, 2H, Fc), 2.90 (m, 2H, Fc),
2.81 (m, 2H, Fc), 2.66 (d, 2J = 10.4 Hz, 2H, ZrCH2), 2.62 (d, 2J = 10.4 Hz,
diastereomer.
The
zirconium
dibenzyl
complex
Fc[NCH(Me)(p-MeC6H4)]2ZrBn2 (6) formed from ZrBn4 and 4
again was shown by 1H NMR to contain mainly the trans
diastereomer.
The results obtained from these experiments indicate that the
reduction of ferrocene bis-imines 1 and 2 with methyllithium is
highly racemoselective. It is well established that high diaster-
eoselectivities are often achieved in the formation of vicinal
diamines through alkylation of glyoxal-derived bis-imines.11,12
With other bis-imines, the outcome of the alkylation varies from
the selective formation of the meso diamines13 to the selective
generation of the racemic diamines.14 However, the favorable
sense of the selectivity (rac) coupled with the proven ability of
diaminoferrocene-based complexes to polymerize ethylene
render the alkylation of ferrocene an attractive route to C2-
symmetric olefin polymerization catalysts.
2H, ZrCH2), 1.67 (d, 3J
40H40FeN2Zr: C, 69.04; H, 5.79; N, 4.03. Found: C, 68.70; H, 5.60; N,
3.79%.
= 6.7 Hz, 6H, Me) ppm. Anal. Calcd for
C
1 L. Resconi, L. Cavallo, A. Fait and F. Piemontesi, Chem. Rev., 2000,
100, 1253–1345.
2 G. W. Coates, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 1223–1252.
3 H. R. H. Damrau, E. Royo, S. Obert, F. Schaper, A. Weeber and H. H.
Brintzinger, Organometallics, 2001, 20, 5258–5265.
4 V. C. Gibson and S. K. Spitzmesser, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103,
283–315.
In order to further optimize the selectivity of the alkylation
step, solvent and temperature effects on the product distribution
were investigated. Conducting the reaction at room temperature
reduced the diastereomeric excess from 80% to 72%. The best
5 F. G. N. Cloke, T. J. Geldbach, P. B. Hitchcock and J. B. Love, J
Organomet. Chem., 1996, 506, 343–345.
6 P. N. O’Shaughnessy, K. M. Gillespie, C. Morton, I. Westmoreland and
P. Scott, Organometallics, 2002, 21, 4496–4504.
7 L. Ackermann and R. G. Bergman, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 1475–1478.
8 T. I. Gountchev and T. D. Tilley, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2003, 345,
81–88.
9 V. C. Gibson, N. J. Long, E. L. Marshall, P. J. Oxford, A. J. P. White and
D. J. Williams, Dalton Trans., 2001, 1162–1164.
10 A. Shafir, D. Fiedler and J. Arnold, Dalton Trans., 2002, 555–560.
11 W. L. Neumann, M. M. Rogic and T. J. Dunn, Tetrahedron Lett., 1991,
32, 5865–5868.
12 R. Bloch, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 1407–1438.
13 K. Henrick, P. M. Judd, P. G. Owston, R. Peters, P. A. Tasker and R. W.
Turner, Chem. Commun., 1983, 1253.
14 M. G. Gardiner and C. L. Raston, Inorg. Chem., 1995, 34,
4206–4212.
Fig. 2
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 2598–2599
2599