A.H. Manikshete et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 14 (2011) 618–621
621
Table 3
Table 4
Biological activity data of complexes.
Hemolytic activity data.
Name of Conc. Staphylococcus Pseudomonas
Aspergillus
niger
Candida
albicans
Name of
compound
% RBC Lysis
Rat
compd. mg/lit. Aureus
Aeruginosa
Human
HL
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Inactive
Weakly active Weakly active
Weakly active Weakly active
HL
24
15
22
30
20
15
23
20
HL―Co
HL―Ni
HL―Cu
Weakly active Weakly active Weakly active Weakly active
Weakly active Weakly active Weakly active Moderately
active
Weakly active Weakly active Weakly active Moderately
active
1.0
The same procedure was repeated for human erythrocytes also
and the results are recorded in Table 4. The cobalt complex shows less
hemolytic activity. The results are very interesting and much helpful
for drug designing.
All the complexes have octahedral geometry and paramagnetic nature.
The cobalt (C42H36N2O8Co.2H2O) and the nickel complexes (C42H36N2O8-
Ni.2H2O) are moderately active against the S. aureus fungi C albicans and A.
niger, The highest activity is observed for copper complex.
HL―Co 0.2
Weakly active Inactive
Weakly active Inactive
Weakly active Inactive
Weakly active Weakly active
Weakly active Weakly active
0.4
0.6
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
0.8
1.0
Weakly active Weakly active Moderately
active
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
Weakly active Moderately
active
HL―Ni
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Moderately
active
Weakly active Weakly active Weakly active
Moderately
active
Weakly active Weakly active Weakly active
Acknowledgement
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
Weakly active Weakly active
We acknowledge Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai for
providing 1H NMR facility. We also acknowledge the Department of
Microbiology, Walchand College of Biotechnology, Solapur for
providing microbial activity facility.
Highly active
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
Highly active
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
HL―Cu 0.2
Moderately
active
Weakly active Weakly active Weakly active
References
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Moderately
active
Highly active
Weakly active Weakly active Weakly active
[1] I.S. Patai, The Chemistry of the Hydrazo, Azo, Azoxy Groups, Part-1, Wiley, New
York, 1975.
[2] I.M. Awad, A.A. Aly, A.M. Abdel Alim, R.A. Abdel Aal, S.H. Ahmed, J. Inorg. Biochem.
33 (1998) 77.
[3] A.G. Makshumov, M.S. Ergashev, F.A. Normatov, Pharm. Chem. J. 25 (1991) 1.
[4] A.A. Jarahour, M. Motamedifar, K. Pakshir, N. Hadi, Z. Zarei, Molecules 9 (2004) 815.
[5] K.Y. Law, Chem. Rev. (1993) 449.
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
Highly active
Highly active
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
Moderately
active
[6] A. Kleeman, J. Engel, B. Kutscher, D. Reichert, Pharmaceuticals Substances, 3 rd
EdnThieme, Stuttgart, 1999.
[7] A.R. Sarkar, S. Mandal, Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem. 80 (2008) 1477.
[8] Offiong E. Offiong, Spectrochim. Acta 50 (1994) 2167.
[9] M.T.H. Tarafder, Ali M. Akbar, Can. J. Chem. 56 (1978) 2000.
[10] S.J. Swamy, A. Dharma Reddy, J. Indian Chem. Soc. 77 (2000) 336.
[11] B.D. Sharma, J.C. Bailur, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77 (1955) 5476.
[12] F.P. Dwyer, M.S. Gill, E.C. Gyarfas, F.J. Lion, Am. Chem. Soc. 79 (1957) 1269.
[13] Kar Salib, S.M. Elsayed, A.M. Elshabiny, Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem. 21
(10) (1990) 1511.
[14] B.A. Mahapatra, S.K. Kar, Orient. J. Chem. 10 (3) (1954) 259.
[15] P.P. Hankare, P.H. Bhoite, P.S. Battse, K.M. Garadkar, A.H. Jagtap, Indian J. Chem.
39A (2000) 1145.
Inhibition
Less than 5 mm=Inactive
6–10 mm=Weakly active
11–14=Moderately active
15 and above=Highly active
different volumes (5–40 μl) of diluted blood samples were drawn into
1 ml of water containing 0.1% of Triton X-100 and buffer with RBCs
was used as blank. The solution was centrifuged at 4000 rpm.
Hemoglobin released in the supernatant was measured spectropho-
tometrically at 540 nm. The volume of RBCs was standardized so as
the absorbance was about ~0.2 OD (about 2×106 cells/ml) range. This
suitable volume was used for the hemolysis assay with synthesized
compounds.
Different volumes of compounds were taken in 1.5 ml eppendorf
tubes containing 5 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.4 containing 150 mM NaCl.
To this, diluted blood suspension (volume as determined above) was
added and total volume in the reaction tube was made up to 1 ml with
buffer. The tubes were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min in a gentle
shaking water bath. After incubation, the samples were centrifuged in
a Kubota centrifuge at 4000 rpm for 5 min to remove the unhemo-
lysed cells. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at
540 nm. Buffer containing RBCs suspension was taken as buffer blank
(A0). The lysis obtained with 0.1% of Triton X-100 with RBCs was taken
for 100% lysis control (A100). The assay was carried out in duplicates
and was repeated thrice. The average values were taken for plotting.
The percentage hemolysis was calculated by using following equation
[16] H.W. Florey, Antibiotics II, Oxford medical publications, U.K, 1949, p. 1476.
[17] S.G. Shirodkar, P.S. Mane, T.K. Chondhekar, Indian J. Chem. 40A (2001) 1114.
[18] R. Rajavel, M. Senthil, Vadivu, C. Anitha, E-J. Chem. 5 (2008) 620.
[19] Gangadhar B. Bagihalli, Prakash Gouda Avaji, Prema S. Badami, Sangamesh Patil, J.
Coord. Chem. 61 (2008) 2793.
[20] J. Iqbal, S. Sharfuddin, M. Imran, S. Latif, Turk. J. Biol. 30 (2006) 1.
[21] B. Mahapatra, Indian Chem. Soc. 59 (1982) 988.
[22] B.B. Mahapatra, Debendra Panda, Transition Met. Chem. 9 (1984) 476.
[23] T. Narayan, Akinchan, et al., Transition Met. Chem. 19 (1994) 135.
[24] F.M. Morad, M.M. EL.ajally, S. Ben Gweirif, J. Sci. Appl. 1 (2007) 72.
[25] P.P. Hankare, A.H. Manikshete, et al., J. Indian Chem. Soc. 68 (1991) 557.
[26] A.A. Ahmed, S.A. BenGuzzi, A.A. Hadi, J. Sci. Appl. (2007) 79.
[27] Khalood's Abou-Melha, J. Coord. Chem. 61 (2008) 2053.
[28] F.A. Cotton, G.Wilkinsons, Advanced Inorganic Chemistry 5th Ed., Wiley, New York
(1988).
[29] K. Siddappa, Tukaram Reddy, M. Mallikarjun, C.V. Reddy, E-J. Chem. 5 (1) (2008) 155.
[30] M.M. Bekhet, K.M. Ibrahim, Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem. 6 (1986) 1135.
[31] Erdal Canpolat, Mehmet Kaya, TUrk. J. Chem. 29 (2005) 409.
[32] Mohammad Shakir, Mohammad Azam, Shama Parveen, Asad U. Khan, Farha
Firdaus, Spectrochim. Acta A1 (2009) 1851.
[33] S. Dehghanpour, N. Bouslimani, R. Welter, F. Mojahed, Polyhedron 26 (2007) 154.
[34] M. Thankamony, K. Mohanan, Indian J. Chem. 46A (2007) 249.
[35] Gehad Geindy Mohamed, et al., TUrk. J. Chem. 30 (2006) 361.
[36] Bo. Wang, Jinxia Liu, Shiyan Yang, Jin daosen, Polyhedron 14 (1995) 895.
[37] Abdul hakim, A. Ahmed. A. Salima. BenGuzzi, Soad. Agumati, J. Sci. Appl. 2 (2008) 83.
[38] Srinivasan Durairaja, Sangeetha Srinivasan, P. Lakshamana Perumalsamy, Elec-
tron. J. Biol. 5 (1) (2009) 5.
[39] Eric F. Bowrsand, Leonard R. Jeffries, J. Clin. Pathol. 8 (1955) 58.
[40] C.H. Collins, P.M. Lyne, J.M. Grange, Editors Collins and Lyne's Microbiological
methods, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1995, p. 320.
ꢀ
ꢁ
H% ¼ Asample−A0 X 100=ðA100−A0Þ
where A100 and A0 are absorbance of 100% and 0% hemolysed cells
respectively.