Communications
Table 1: Ir-catalyzed allylic alkylation of carbonate 4a according to Scheme 2.[a]
dominant in the 31P NMR spectrum (see
above). Addition of only THT did not affect
the activity of the catalyst (cf. entries 7 and
3). Similarly, addition of CuI did not show
an effect without additional THT (cf.
Entry L1
[mol%] ([mol%])
Additive A[b] TBD
Additive B[c] t[d] [h] Yield
Ratio
ee(5a) [%][g]
[mol%] ([mol%])
5a+6a [%][e] 5a/6a[f] (Abs. config.)
1
4
4
4
8
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
0.4
–
–
–
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
–
–
–
–
120
22
4
12
140
2
77
87
89
80
60
87
83
89:11
94:6
97:3
97:3
92:8
97:3
98:2
98:2
98:2
98:2
99:1
98:2
88 (+)(S)
90 (+)(S)
95 (+)(S)
92 (+)(S)
75 (+)(S)
95 (+)(S)
95 (+)(S)
95 (+)(S)
96 (+)(S)
96 (+)(S)
96 (+)(S)
94 (+)(S)
2[h]
3
LiCl (100)
–
–
entries 8,
7 and 3). Increased activity
resulted only upon addition of both addi-
tives (entry 9). In this case, the signals of K2
had completely disappeared in the 31P NMR
spectrum, and in addition to the signal at
98 ppm there was a broad signal at 130 ppm.
The activity of the catalyst could be notice-
ably increased by using an excess of THT as
well as CuI (entries 10, 11; cf. General
Procedure). The high activity of the new
catalyst allowed Ir-catalyzed allylic alkyla-
tions for the first time to be carried out with
less than 1 mol% of the iridium catalyst
with very good results (entry 12).
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12[i]
PPh3 (4)
PPh3 (4)
THT (4)
–
THT (4)
THT (20)
THT (80)
THT (5)
–
CuI (4)
–
6
CuI (24)
CuI (4)
CuI (20)
CuI (100)
CuI (5)
5.5 74
1.5 83
1.5 92
<1
24
12
8
1.2
84
77
[a] Reaction conditions: 1 mmol 4a, L1/[{Ir(cod)Cl}2]=2:1,2 equiv NaCH(COOMe) ,0.25 m in THF,
2
RT. [b] Addition before base and substrate. [c] Addition after substrate. [d] Reaction time. [e] Yield of
1
isolated product. [f] Determined from the H NMR spectrum of the crude product. [g] Determined by
HPLC on a chiral column (Daicel Chiralcel OJ-H,2504.6 mm,5 mm with guard cartridge OJ-H,10
4 mm,5 mm,0.5 mLmin À1): 5a (n-hexane/isopropanol 90:10,20 8C,254 nm): tR[(+)(S)-5a]=26 min,
tR[(À)(R)-5a]=29 min. [h] Reaction temperature: 508C. [i] 0.2 mol% [{Ir(cod)Cl}2],0.4 mol% L1.
The optimal reaction conditions (cf.
General Procedure) were applied to further
These results suggested that we generate the catalyst
before the allylic substitution using a base other than the
nucleophile. In our studies on the intramolecular allylic
amination,[7d] this concept indeed led to a very active catalyst.
This catalyst was prepared by treatment of [Ir(cod)(L1)Cl]
with 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]undec-5-ene (TBD). In this
reaction a species of unknown structure displaying a singlet
at 98 ppm (31P NMR) was formed initially. After approx-
imately 2h the concentration of this compound reached a
maximum, and after prolonged reaction time (5–10 h) it was
transformed mainly into K2 (31P NMR signals at 128 and
153 ppm). On the basis of these results it appeared possible to
avoid the formation of K2, which displays low catalytic
activity (Table 1, entry 1) because one coordination site is
blocked by L1. Indeed, use of the system prepared over a
period of only 2h, largely devoid of K2, resulted in very rapid
and highly selective alkylation (Table 1, entry 3). For a
crosscheck, we increased the amount of L1 (L1:Ir= 2:1); as
anticipated, this led to a slow reaction (entry 4).
substrates, including the problematic alkyl- and alkoxyalkyl-
substituted compounds, in order to investigate the substrate
scope of the new catalyst (Table 2). For all examples both very
high activity and enantioselectivity were found.
The absolute configuration of dienylic esters such as 5a
and 5b was not determined previously. We have now
prepared the derivative 7 from 5a (Scheme 3); its absolute
configuration could be determined by X-ray crystal structure
analysis on account of the two heavy atoms. (Note that the
change of the descriptors in Table 2is only a consequence of
the different CIP priorities of the substituents R in 5.)
In conclusion, we have developed a highly active in situ
catalyst for the iridium-catalyzed enantioselective allylic
Table 2: Ir-catalyzed allylic alkylation of the carbonates 4a–4 f according
to Scheme 2 under optimal reaction conditions.[a]
Entry
Substrate
t[b] [h]
Yield
Ratio
ee(5) [%][e]
(Abs. config.)
(5+6) [%][c]
5:6[d]
To explore another possibility for avoiding formation of
K2, we added a soft, cheap auxiliary ligand L (Table 1,
additive A) prior to the base, and catalysis was induced with a
soft metal ion (Table 1, additive B).[12] PPh3 was the first
auxiliary ligand tested. Treatment of a 1:1:1 mixture of
[{Ir(cod)Cl}2], L1, and PPh3 with TBD gave complex K3
(31P NMR signals at 6 and 152ppm), [7b] which displayed low
catalytic activity (entry 5) as expected, because coordination
of PPh3 to IrI is strong. However, if after addition of 4a an
amount of CuI was added equivalent to the amount of Ir, a
very active catalyst was obtained (entry 6). In other words, the
selective removal of the auxiliary ligand PPh3 with the cheap
CuI as a scavenger is possible.[13]
The continued search for even more suitable auxiliary
ligands led to sulfides, in particular tetrahydrothiophene
(THT), as the best solution so far. Optimal results were
obtained by treatment of a 1:1:5 mixture of [{Ir(cod)Cl}2], L1,
and THT with TBD for only 2h, thus, avoiding the formation
of K2. At this time the species with a singlet at 98 ppm was
1
2
3
4
5
6
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4 f
1.5
1
1
<1
2
2
92
79
88
95
92
88
98:2
98:2
99:1
99:1
81:19
88:12
96 (+)(S)
96 (+)
96 (+)(R)
97 (+)(R)
96 (+)(R)
97 (+)
[a] M=Na,Table 1,entry 10 and General Procedure. [b] Reaction time.
[c] Yield of isolated product. [d] Determined from the 1H NMR spectrum
of the crude product. [e] Determined by HPLC on a chiral column; 5b by
determination as 4-bromobenzoate (Daicel Chiralcel OJ-H,250
4.6 mm,5 mm with guard cartridge OJ-H,104 mm,5
mm,
0.5 mLminÀ1, n-hexane/isopropanol 99:1,28 8C,254 nm): tR[(+)-5b]=
96 min, tR[(À)-5b]=115 min; 5c (same HPLC setup as for 5b, n-hexane/
isopropanol 97:3,30 8C,220 nm): tR[(À)(S)-5c]=56 min, tR[(+)(R)-5c]=
62 min; 5d (Daicel Chiralcel OD-H,2504.6 mm,5 mm with guard
cartridge OD-H,104 mm,5 mm,0.5 mLmin À1, n-hexane/isopropanol
90:10,20 8C,220 nm): tR[(+)(R)-5d]=12 min, tR[(À)(S)-5d]=14 min;
5e (same HPLC setup as for 5b, n-hexane/isopropanol 98:2,25 8C,
220 nm): tR[(+)(R)-5e]=42 min, tR[(À)(S)-5e]=54 min; 5 f (same
HPLC setup as for 5d, n-hexane/isopropanol 99:1,25 8C,220 nm):
tR[(+)-5 f]=12.3 min, tR[(À)-5 f]=14.9 min.
4596
ꢀ 2004 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4595 –4597