2-iodo-(Z)-alkenylphosphonate 4a or 2-chloro-(Z)-alkenyl-
phosphonate 6a in 88% and 85% yields, respectively. It was
notable that NBS reacted with zircono-alkenylphosphonate in
the presence of CuCl to give a mixture of two products –
2-bromo-(Z)-alkenylphosphonate 5a and 2-chloro-(Z)-alkenyl-
phosphonate 6a. Some halogen-exchange occurred during the
reaction. Moreover, treatment of zircono-alkenylphosphonate
with allyl bromide in the presence of CuCl obtained 7a in 78%
yield, in which one new carbon–carbon bond formed. The
reaction of zircono-alkenylphosphonate with acyl chloride gave
compound 8a.
To elucidate the mechanism, the reaction of
Cp2Zr(PhCCH)PMe3 with chlorophosphate was followed by
31P NMR spectroscopy. 31P NMR spectra showed two signals at
1.7 ppm and 4.7 ppm after ClP(O)(OEt)2 was added to the
solution of Cp2Zr(PhCCH)(PMe3) at 0 °C. It is confirmed that
the signals at 1.7 ppm and 4.7 ppm are assigned to
Cp2Zr(PhCCH)(PMe3) and ClP(O)(OEt)2. After the reaction
mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 1 h, two new signals had
appeared at 20.5 ppm and 41.7 ppm, The former became
stronger and the later weaker after the reaction mixture was
stirred at 50 °C for 6 h. These results indicated that two
intermediates formed and that the intermediate 14 (dP = 41.7
ppm) was unstable and gradually transformed into intermediate
1. After quenching with 3N HCl, only one new signal (chemical
shift 20.2 ppm) appeared in the 31P NMR spectrum of the
reaction mixture. The signals at 41.7 and 20.5 ppm both
completely disappeared. That means that the compounds
corresponding to 41.7 and 20.5 ppm in the 31P NMR afforded
exclusively diethyl-(E)-2-phenyl ethenylphosphonate 2a after
hydrolysis.
Based on the above results, a proposed reaction mechanism is
shown in Scheme 4. It is reported that treatment of Cp2Zr(1-
butene)PR3 with alkynes gives resonance hybrid zircono-alkyne
complex 9 and zirconacyclopropene 10.6 Compound 9 or 10
couples readily with other unsaturated compounds,6,7,9 as here
with chlorophosphate to give complex 1310 via compound 11 or
12. The intermediate 13 undergoes elimination of chloride to
give compounds 145,11 and 1. Both are in equilibrium but
compound 1 is favored, as confirmed by the 31P NMR spectrum.
After hydrolysis both compounds 14 and 1 give alkenylphos-
phonate 2.
Scheme 4
support. We also thank Professor T. Takahashi for his kind
suggestions.
Notes and references
1 (a) I. T. Minam and J. Motoyoshsiya, Synthesis, 1992, 333; (b) K.
Afarinkia, H. M. Binch and C. Modi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 7419;
(c) S. Megati, S. Phadtare and J. Zemlicka, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57,
2320; (d) H. B. Lazrek, A. Rochdi, H. Khaider, J. L. Barascut, J. L.
Imbach, J. Balzarini, M. Witvrouw, C. Pannecouque and E. De Clerq,
Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 3807.
2 (a) L.-B. Han and M. Tanaka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 1571; (b)
C.-Q. Zhao, L.-B. Han and M. Tanaka, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001,
40, 1929.
3 (a) L.-B. Han, N. Choi and M. Tanaka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
7000; (b) L.-B. Han and M. Tanaka, Chem. Lett., 1999, 863; (c) A.
Allen, Jr., D. R. Manke and W. Lin, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 151.
4 (a) S. Deprèle and J.-L. Montchamp, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124,
9386; (b) A. Allen, Jr., L. Ma and W. Lin, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43,
3707.
An alternative mechanism involving oxidative addition of
ClP(O)(OEt)2 to complex Cp2Zr(R1CCR2)(PR3 ) giving
3
Cp2ClZrP(O)(OEt)2(R1CCR2)(PR3) and subsequent insertion
of alkyne into the Zr–P(O)(OEt)2 moiety to afford 14 and 1 can
not be ruled out.
In conclusion, we have developed a novel reaction for the
direct preparation of stereodefined substituted metallo-alkene-
phosphonate, which could be converted into various b-
functionalized alkenephosphonates.
Further investigations are still in progress in this area.
We are grateful to the National Natural Sciences Foundation
of China (20172032) and Tsinghua University for financial
5 T. Takahashi, C. Xi, Y. Ura and K. Nakajima, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000,
122, 3228.
6 (a) E. Negishi, F. E. Cederbaum and T. Takahashi, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1986, 27, 2829; (b) S. L. Buchwald and B. T. Watson, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1987, 109, 2544; (c) E. Negishi, S. L. Holmes, J. M. Tour, J. A.
Miller, F. E. Cederbaum, D. R. Swanson and T. Takahashi, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 3336.
7 T. Takahashi, D. R. Swanson and E. Negishi, Chem. Lett., 1987, 623.
8 (a) C. Benezra, Tetrahedron. Lett., 1961, 51, 4471; (b) C. I. Sainz-Diaz,
E. Gàlvez-Ruano, A. Hernandez-laguna and J. Bellanalo, J. Org. Chem.,
1995, 60, 74; (c) H.-J. Cristau, X. Y. Mbianda, Y. Beziat and M.-B.
Gasc, J. Organomet. Chem., 1997, 529, 301.
9 (a) G. Erker and K. Kropp, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 3659; (b) W.
A. Nugent and J. C. Calabrese, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 6422; (c)
E. Negishi, S. J. Holmes, J. M. Tour and J. Miller, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1985, 107, 2568; (d) S. L. Buchwald, B. T. Watson and J. C. Huffman,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108, 7411; (e) S. L. Buchwald, B. T. Watson,
R. T. Lum and W. A. Nugent, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 7137; (f)
P. J. Fagan and W. A. Nugent, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 2310; (g)
B. C. V. Wagene and T. Livinghouse, Tetrahedron Lett., 1989, 30,
3495; (h) S. L. Buchwald, R. T. Lum and J. C. Dewan, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1991, 113, 258.
10 C. Xi, M. Ma and X. Li, Chem. Commun., 2001, 2554.
11 (a) M.-P. Teulade and P. Savignac, Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, 28, 405; (b)
B. Iorga, L. Ricard and P. Savignac, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1,
2000, 3311.
Scheme 3
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 2736–2737
2737