Phenolic Compounds in Rooibos
J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 56, No. 9, 2008 3369
(PTFE) tubing. The total capacity was 300 mL. The MLCCC was run
at a revolution speed of 800 rpm and a flow rate of 2 mL/min in head
to tail modus.
Samples of 1 g were dissolved in a 1:1 mixture (10 mL) of light
and heavy phase and injected into the system. The solvent system for
separation of ethyl acetate extract or n-butanol extract consisted of ethyl
acetate/n-butanol/water (3:1:4 (v/v)). Diethyl ether extracts were
separated by using water/ethyl acetate (2:1 (v/v)).
Analytical HPLC-DAD. A Jasco (Gross-Umstadt, Germany) qua-
ternary gradient unit PU 2080, with degasser DG 2080-54, autosampler
AS 2055, column oven (Jasco Jetstream II), and multiwavelength
detector MD 2015 was used. Chromatographic separations were
performed on stainless steel columns (VYDAC CRT, no. 218TP54,
250 × 4.0 mm, RP 18, 5 µm, Hesperia, CA) using a flow rate of 1.0
mL min-1. The mobile phase used was water (solvent A) and MeOH/
water (7:3 (v/v), solvent B). To both solvents (A and B), 0.6 mL/L
heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA) was added. Samples were injected at
10% B; the gradient then changed linear to 30% B in 30 min, to 65%
B in 40 min, and to 100% B in 2 min and were held at 100% B for 8
min. The column temperature was 25 °C. The effluent was monitored
at 280 and 350 nm.
Preparative HPLC-UV. A Besta HD 2-200 pump (Wilhelmsfeld,
Germany) was used at a flow rate of 8 mL min-1. Elution of materials
was monitored by a UV detector (Jasco UV- 2075, Gross-Umstadt).
Chromatographic separations were performed on stainless steel columns
(VYDAC CRT, no. 218TP1022, 250 × 23 mm, RP18, 10 µm, Hesperia,
CA). The mobile phase used was solvents A and B, identical to the
analytical HPLC-DAD system. From the individual chromatographic
fractions, solvents were removed under reduced pressure. After addition
of water, solutions of polyphenols were freeze-dried.
Figure 1. HPLC-DAD chromatogram of ethyl acetate extract from
fermented and unfermented rooibos tea at λ ) 280 nm. Retention times
are given in parentheses: 1, (S)-eriodictyol-6-C-ꢀ-D-glucopyranoside (26.3
min); 2, (S)-eriodictyol-8-C-ꢀ-D-glucopyranoside (29.1 min); 3, (R)-
eriodictyol-6-C-ꢀ-D-glucopyranoside (29.5 min); 4, (R)-eriodictyol-8-C-ꢀ-
D-glucopyranoside (30.4 min); 5, aspalathin (39.4 min); 6, orientin (40.9
min); 7/8, isoorientin/vitexin (44.1 min); 9, nothofagin (47.8 min); 10,
isovitexin (49.7 min); 11, rutin (50.6 min); 12, hyperoside (51.6 min); 13,
isoquercitrin, (52.1 min) 14, chlorogenic acid (19.3 min).
Preparative Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC). Separation was
performed on silica gel 60 F254 plates, 2 mm (Merck), with ethyl acetate/
hexane (1:1 (v/v)) as the mobile phase. For isolation of substances,
spots were scratched off. Then, target material was eluted from silica
gel with methanol.
Accurate Mass Determination. The high-resolution positive and
negative ion ESI mass spectra (HR-MS) were obtained from a Bruker
Apex III Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) mass
spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, USA) equipped with an
Infinity cell, a 7.0 T superconducting magnet (Bruker, Karlsruhe,
Germany), a radio frequency (RF)-only hexapole ion guide and an
external electrospray ion source (APOLLO; Agilent, off-axis spray).
Nitrogen was used as the drying gas at 150 °C. The samples were
dissolved in methanol, and the solutions were introduced continuously
via a syringe pump at a flow rate of 120 µL h-1. The data were acquired
with 256k data points and zero filled to 1024k by averaging 32
scans.
Figure 2. Separation of ethyl acetate extract from unfermented rooibos
tea by MLCCC: A, mixture of flavonoids; B, (S)-eriodictyol-8-C-ꢀ-D-
glycopyranoside (2); C, chlorogenic acid (14), (S)-eriodictyol-6-C-ꢀ-D-
glucopyranoside (1), (R)-eriodictyol-6-C-ꢀ-D-glucopyranoside (3), (R)-
eriodictyol-8-C-ꢀ-D-glucopyranoside (4), and rutin (11); D, isoorientin (7);
E, aspalathin (5); F, orientin (6) and vitexin (8); G, nothofagin (9) and
isovitexin (10); H, hyperoside (12) and isoquercitrin (13).
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Nuclear magnetic resonance
(NMR) spectra were recorded on a Varian Unity Inova 500 instrument
(Darmstadt, Germany). Chemical shifts are given relative to external
Me4Si.
and N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamide were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich
(Taufkirchen, Germany). Salicylic acid was ordered from Kosmos
(Stuttgart, Germany).
NMR Data of Vitexin (8). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 6.76 (1 H, s,
H3), 6.26 (1 H, s, H6), 8.01 (2 H, d, J ) 8.7 Hz, H2′, H6′), 6.87 (2 H,
d, J ) 8.7 Hz, H3′, H5′), 4.67 (1 H, d, J ) 9.8 Hz, H1′′), 3.81 (1 H,
t, J ) 9.7 Hz, H2′′), 3.29 (1 H, m, H3′′), 3.37 (1 H, t, J ) 9.2 Hz,
H4′′), 3.23 (1 H, m, H5′′), 3.75 (1 H, dd, J ) 11.9 Hz, 2.2 Hz, H6a′′),
3.51 (1 H, dd, J ) 6.0 Hz, 11.7 Hz, H6b′′) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-
d6): δ 163.91 (C2), 102.41 (C3), 182.06 (C4), 155.96 (C5), 98.10 (C6),
162.51 (C7), 104.01 (C8), 160.35 (C9), 104.58 (C10), 121.57 (C1′),
128.92 (C2′, C6′), 115.77 (C3′, C5′), 161.10 (C4′), 73.34 (C1′′), 70.80
(C2′′), 78.63 (C3′′), 70.51 (C4′′), 81.81 (C5′′), 61.26 (C6′′) ppm.
NMR Data of IsoVitexin (10). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 6.77 (1 H, s,
H3), 6.51 (1 H, s, H 8), 7.91 (2 H, d, J ) 8.8 Hz, H2′, H6′), 6.91 (2
H, d, J ) 8.8 Hz, H3′, H5′), 4.57 (1 H, d, J ) 9.9 Hz, H1′′), 4.02 (1
H, t, J ) 8.9 Hz, H2′′), 3.19 (1 H, t, J ) 8.5 Hz, H3′′), 3.11 (1 H, t,
J ) 9.2 Hz, H4′′), 3.15 (1 H, m, H5′′), 3.68 (1 H, dd, J ) 10.4 Hz,
H6a′′), 3.40 (1 H, dd, J ) 5.9 Hz, 10.4 Hz, H6b′′) ppm. 13C NMR
(DMSO-d6): δ 163.96 (C2), 103.22 (C3), 182.39 (C4), 161.60 (C5),
109.31 (C6), 163.67 (C7), 94.20 (C8), 156.64 (C9), 103.85 (C10),
Extraction of Rooibos Tea. Rooibos tea from the Biedouw Valley
of South Africa was obtained from Ronnefeldt (Worpswede, Germany).
A 100 g amount of fermented (red-brownish) or unfermented (green)
rooibos was extracted with acetone/water (7:3 (v/v)) at 5 °C for 24 h
under argon atmosphere and decanted. Acetone was removed under
reduced pressure. The residual H2O phase was successively extracted
with diethyl ether (2 × 200 mL), ethyl acetate (2 × 200 mL), and
n-butanol (2 × 200 mL). From the individual extracts, solvents were
removed under reduced pressure.
Multilayer Countercurrent Chromatography. The MLCCC sys-
tem (Ito, Multilayer Separator-Extractor Model, P.C. Inc., Potomac)
was equipped with a Waters constant-flow pump (model 6000 A), a
Zeiss spectraphotometer PM2D operating at 280 nm, and a sample
injection valve with a 10 mL sample loop. Eluted liquids were collected
in fractions of 8 mL with a fraction collector (LKB Ultrorac 7000).
Chromatograms were recorded on a plotter (Servogor 200). The
multilayer coil was prepared from 1.6 mm i.d. poly(tetrafluoraethylene)