Synthesis of Terpyridine-Containing Polymers with Blocky Architectures

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/ma0352375

The synthesis of copolymers with blocky architectures, using the controlled radical polymerization (CRP) and nitroxide-mediated radical polymerization (NMP) techniques was investigated. It was observed that CRP facilitates the preparation of block copolym

Full text of DOI:10.1021/ma0352375

1990
Macromolecules 2004, 37, 1990-1993
Ta ble 1. Molecu la r Weigh t Ch a r a cter istics of Cop olym er s
Syn th esized by NMP a n d RAF T
Syn th esis of Ter p yr id in e-Con ta in in g
P olym er s w ith Block y Ar ch itectu r es
Mn
Mw
mol %
polymer
architecture
(kDa) (kDa) MWD terpy
Kh a led A. Aa m er a n d Gr egor y N. Tew *
1
2
P(Sty-ran-StyTerpy
P(Sty-b-(Sty-ran-
)
32.2
67.2
42.9
93.1
1.30
1.40
10
7.5
Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, University
of Massachusetts, Amherst, 120 Governors Drive,
Amherst, Massachusetts 01003
StyTerpy
)
3
P(MMA-b-(MMA-ran- 37.3
StyTerpy))
45.4
1.22
2.5
Received August 20, 2003
CRP including atom transfer radical polymerization
(ATRP), nitroxide-mediated radical polymerization
(NMP), and reversible addition-fragmentation chain
transfer polymerization (RAFT) are valuable techniques
to control polymer architecture and are tolerant to a
broad range of functionalities.28,32-36 As part of our
program on supramolecular polymers, we aimed to
synthesis structures containing terpy ligands in the side
chain with well-defined architectures including control
over molecular weight (MW), molecular weight distribu-
tion (MWD), and mol % incorporation of the terpy
ligands along the polymer backbone. In addition, the
ability to control terpy incorporation into one or more
segments of a block copolymer will generate ordered
structures and is an important component of well-
defined architectures. To achieve this goal, we studied
the three common CRP techniques and found both NMP
and RAFT were successful in preparing copolymers;
however, to date ATRP has been unsuccessful, most
likely due to the large molar ratio of terpy in the
reaction.
Revised Manuscript Received December 22, 2003
Self-assembly is a powerful tool to generate multi-
functional materials, and supramolecular polymeric
structures with well-defined architecture are of growing
interest for various applications.1 Self-assembly uses a
variety of strategies to direct molecules including hy-
drogen and metal bonds, π-π and donor-acceptor
associations, electrostatics, hydrophilic-hydrophobic,
and van der Waals forces.2 Metal-ligand interactions
are a good choice since these are strong enough to allow
robust assembly and cause the appearance of new
properties characteristic of the metal complex (e.g.,
metal-to-ligand or ligand-to-metal charge-transfer bands),
leading to luminescence, magnetism, and thermo-
chromism while, at the same time, weak enough to allow
the manifestation of intrinsic properties of the metal and
ligands (e.g., ligand-centered and metal-centered ab-
sorption bands and redox waves).3 In addition, the
complexes have well-controlled geometry and stoichi-
ometry which are defined by the choice of ligand and
metal ion.
Table 1 summarizes the polymers reported here, and
their synthesis is shown in Figure 1. The key styrene-
based monomer (StyTerpy, 5) is shown and was synthe-
sized from 5-([2,2′;6′,2′′]-terpyridin-4′-yloxy)pentylamine,23
4, by HOBT/DCC coupling in high yield (80%) and
purity. Random copolymer 1 was synthesized using the
alkoxyamine initiator 7, which is known to allow
controlled polymerization of functionalized styrene mono-
mers.27,28 The GPC trace of polymer 1 shows a molecular
weight (MW) of 32.2 kDa at 66% conversion, which may
be increased by changing the monomer/initiator ratio.
On the basis of elemental analysis of the copolymer
nitrogen content, there is 10 mol % terpyridine, which
Previous work on supramolecular polymers has used
metal-ligand interactions to guide the process. Pyri-
dine-based metal-ligands including bipyridine (bipy)
and terpyridine (terpy) have been used by a few groups
to design and synthesize polymeric structures with
different architectures.4-7 Polyoxazolines were prepared
containing bipy with thermal reversibility.8-10 Employ-
ing both the convergent and divergent approach, Fraser
reported several systems based on bipy cores including
star-shaped polymers.11-19 Schubert reported structures
based on a single terpy ligand at the chain end by
polymerization from a terpy functionalized alkoxyamine
initiator.21-24 Both Schubert and our lab reported meth-
yl methacrylate (MMA) polymers containing terpy in the
side chain.24,25 We showed the solution viscosity of these
polymers increased upon addition of copper(II) ions.25
For macromolecules containing terpy in the side chain,
the ability to localize the metal ligand to one segment
would provide block copolymer architectures for use in
supramolecular polymer science. To date, no control over
polymer architecture has been achieved for polymers
containing metal-ligand side chains. In this paper, we
report the synthesis and characterization of block-
random polymer architectures based on styrene and
MMA with narrow polydispersity index containing terpy
in the side chain using living controlled radical polym-
erization (CRP).
1
is consistent with the H NMR integration. From the
initial comonomer feed ratio (9:1 styrene:StyTerpy) and
the 10 mol % terpy content found in this copolymer at
66% conversion, we conclude that the StyTerpy monomer
prefers to add to the growing chain slightly faster than
styrene. This would explain the tendency of StyTerpy, 5,
to be incorporated faster than styrene in the copolymer;
however, until detailed kinetic experiments are finished
to provide quantitative values for reactivity ratios,
further conclusions cannot be drawn.
Following successful synthesis of the random copoly-
mer 1, we turned our attention to block architectures.
Copolymer 2 was synthesized using the polystyrene
macroinitiator 6, styrene (90 mol %), and 5 (10 mol %)
at 125 °C according to Figure 1. The efficiency of the
10.1021/ma0352375 CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 02/07/2004

Macromolecules, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2004
Notes 1991
F igu r e 1. Scheme for the synthesis of monomer 5, NMP, and RAFT copolymerization of 1, 2, and 3.
polystyrene macroinitiator to reinitiate monomer is
evidenced from the overlaid GPC chromatograms in
Figure 2, which shows both the macroinitiator and
copolymer.27,28 The presence of the terpy causes broad-
ening of the peak, which is consistent with previous
reports on pyridine-containing polymers.37 The high mol
% incorporation of terpy obtained at 56% conversion is
consistent with observations from the synthesis of 1 in
which 5 appears to add to the growing chain in prefer-
ence to styrene. These results show NMP allows blocky
architectures, based on styrene, to be prepared in which
the terpy unit is confined to one segment.
explored RAFT polymerization.30 Polymer 3 was suc-
cessfully prepared using MMA macro-chain-transfer
agent 9, AIBN, MMA (90 mol %), and 5 (10 mol %) in
benzene at 60 °C as shown in Figure 1. Figure 3 shows
the overlaid GPC traces for 9 and copolymer 3. The total
mol % incorporation of terpy is only 2.5 mol % based on
1
elemental analysis of the nitrogen content and H NMR
at 95% conversion. This indicates monomer 5 has a
lower tendency to be incorporated than MMA in the
copolymer under the RAFT conditions. The GPC trace
shows little broadening in the peak, most likely due to
the decreased mol % incorporation of terpy compared
to 2.
UV-vis spectroscopy in CHCl3 confirms incorporation
of terpy in all three polymer samples. Figure 4 shows
the UV-vis spectrum of StyTerpy monomer, 5, which has
The synthesis of block-random MMA structures was
undertaken to complement our initial report on random
terpy-containing MMA polymers.25 However, NMP is
not the best choice for MMA synthesis, and so we

1992 Notes
Macromolecules, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2004
F igu r e 2. Overlaid GPC trace of polystyrene macroinitiator end-capped with the alkoxyamine, 6, and poly(styrene-b-(styrene-
ran-StyTerpy)), 2, synthesized via NMP in THF mobile phase.
F igu r e 3. Overlaid GPC trace of R,ω-(thiobenzoylthio)poly(methyl methacrylate) macro-chain-transfer agent, 9, and poly(MMA-
b-(MMA-ran-StyTerpy)), 3, synthesized via RAFT in THF as mobile phase.
two distinct transitions at 277 and 244 nm. The spectra
of 1 and 2 were normalized to 5, showing similar peak
intensity expected for these polymers since they contain
both styrene and terpy functions. In contrast, the
spectrum of 3 is not normalized since there is much less
absorption at 244 nm due to the absence of styrene in
the backbone and the low mol % terpy incorporation;
however, the spectrum confirms terpy incorporation.
In conclusion, we report the first CRP of terpy
monomers, based on vinylbenzamides, to synthesize
styrene and MMA copolymers with terpy in the side
chain and control over MW, MWD, composition, and
architecture. CRP (NMP and RAFT) allows the synthe-
sis of block copolymers with terpy functions confined to
one block which represents a new architecture for
supramolecular polymers containing pyridine ligands.

Macromolecules, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2004
Notes 1993
F igu r e 4. UV-vis spectra of copolymers 1,2, and 3 and monomer 5 in chloroform containing 1% ethanol.
(16) Park, C. M.; McAlvin, J . E.; Fraser, C. L.; Thomas, E. L.
Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 1225-1230.
The successful syntheses of these block copolymers will
facilitate the study of novel supramolecular polymers
with interesting assembly properties.
(17) Smith, A. P.; Fraser, C. L. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 2654-
2660.
(18) Wu, X. F.; Collings, J . E.; McAlvin, J . E.; Cutts, R. W.;
Fraser, C. L. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 2812-2821.
(19) Wu, X. F.; Fraser, C. L. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 4053-
4060.
Ack n ow led gm en t. This work was supported by the
MRSEC program of the National Science Foundation
under Award (DMR 9400488). G.N.T. thanks ONR for
a Young Investigators Award and 3M Corporation for
a Non-tenured Faculty Award. The authors thank Dr.
Craig Hawker for fruitful discussion and providing the
alkoxyamine initiator.
(20) Schubert, U. S.; Eschbaumer, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 2892-2926.
(21) Gohy, J . F.; Lohmeijer, B. G. G.; Schubert, U. S. Macromol.
Rapid Commun. 2002, 23, 555-560.
(22) Schubert, U. S.; Eschbaumer, C.; Andres, P.; Hofmeier, H.;
Weidl, C. H.; Herdtweck, E.; Dulkeith, E.; Morteani, A.;
Hecker, N. E.; Feldmann, J . Synth. Met. 2001, 121, 1249-
1252.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Synthetic proce-
dures and materials characterization data. This material is
available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
(23) Schubert, U. S.; Eschbaumer, C.; Hien, O.; Andres, P. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4705-4707.
(24) Schubert, U. S.; Hofmeier, H. Macromol. Rapid Commun.
2002, 23, 561-566.
(25) Calzia, K. J .; Tew, G. N. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 6090-
Refer en ces a n d Notes
6093.
(26) Newkome, G. R.; He, E. J . Mater. Chem. 1997, 7, 1237-
1244.
(27) Benoit, D.; Chaplinski, V.; Braslau, R.; Hawker, C. J . J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3904-3920.
(28) Hawker, C. J .; Bosman, A. W.; Harth, E. Chem. Rev. 2001,
101, 3661-3688.
(29) Donovan, M. S.; Sanford, T. A.; Lowe, A. B.; Sumerlin, B.
S.; Mitsukami, Y.; McCormick, C. L. Macromolecules 2002,
35, 4570-4772.
(1) Ikkala, O.; Brinke, G. T. Science 2002, 295, 2407-2409.
(2) Lehn, J .-M. Supramolecular ChemistrysConcepts and Pro-
spectives; VCH: Weinheim, 1995.
(3) Balzani, V.; J uris, A.; Venturi, M.; Campagna, S.; Serroni,
S. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 759-833.
(4) Lohmeijer, B. G. G.; Schubert, U. S. J . Polym. Sci., Polym
Chem. 2003, 41, 1413-1427.
(5) Potts, K. T.; Usifer, D. A. Macromolecules 1988, 21, 1985-
1991.
(6) Hanabusa, K.; Nakano, K.; Koyama, T.; Shirai, H.; Hojo,
N.; Kurose, A. Makromol. Chem. 1990, 191, 391-396.
(7) Hanabusa, K.; Nakamura, A.; Koyama, T.; Shirai, H.
Makromol. Chem. 1992, 193, 1309-1319.
(8) Chujo, Y.; Sada, K.; Saegusa, T. Macromolecules 1993, 26,
6320-6323.
(30) Nakamoto, K. J . Phys. Chem. 1960, 64, 1420-1425.
(31) Lee, J .; Hogen-Esch, T. E. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 2805-
2811.
(32) Evans, R. A.; Rizzardo, E. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 6983-
6989.
(33) Ganachaud, F.; Monteiro, M. J .; Gilbert, R. G.; Dourges, M.
A.; Thang, S. H.; Rizzardo, E. Macromolecules 2000, 33,
6738-6745.
(34) Moad, G.; Mayadunne, R. T. A.; Rizzardo, E.; Skidmore, M.;
Thang, S. H. Macromol. Symp. 2003, 192, 1-12.
(35) Donovan, M. S.; Sanford, T. A.; Lowe, A. B.; Sumerlin, B.
S.; Mitsukami, Y.; McCormick, C. L. Macromolecules 2002,
35, 4570-4772.
(9) Chujo, Y.; Sada, K.; Saegusa, T. Macromolecules 1993, 26,
6315-6319.
(10) Chujo, Y.; Sada, K.; Saegusa, T. Polym. J . 1993, 23, 599-
608.
(11) J ohnson, R. M.; Ng, C.; Samson, C. C. M.; Fraser, C. L.
Macromolecules 2000, 33, 8618-8628.
(12) Lamba, J . J . S.; Fraser, C. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
1801-1802.
(36) Gotz, H.; Harth, E.; Schiller, S. M.; Frank, C. W.; Knoll, W.;
Hawker, C. J . J . Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. 2002, 40, 3379-
3391.
(13) McAlvin, J . E.; Fraser, C. L. Macromolecules 1999, 32,
1341-1347.
(14) McAlvin, J . E.; Fraser, C. L. Macromolecules 1999, 32,
6925-6932.
(37) Peter, K.; Thelakkat, M. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 1779-
1785.
(15) McAlvin, J . E.; Scott, S. B.; Fraser, C. L. Macromolecules
2000, 33, 6953-6964.
MA0352375