dipyrrinato metal complexes,12À14 and we envisioned that
they could also be suitable precursors to F-BODIPYs.
We started by using a series of isolated dipyrrinato
lithium salts, prepared using LiHMDS and the corre-
sponding dipyrrin HBr salt.13 We were delighted to find
that when these dipyrrinato lithium salts were treated with
just 1 equiv of BF3•OEt2 the resulting F-BODIPYs could
be isolated in high yields. Furthermore, we found that
isolation of the intermediate dipyrrinato lithium salt was
unnecessary: generation of the lithium salt from the corre-
sponding dipyrrin and/or dipyrrin hydrobromide salt in
situ (using 1.1 or 2.2 equiv of LiHMDS, respectively),
followed by the addition of 1 equiv of BF3•OEt2, gave
comparable yields of the resulting F-BODIPYs, with
purification requiring merely a filtration through Celite
to remove the LiF byproduct.
Table 2. Synthesis of F-BODIPYs from Dipyrrinato Lithium
Salts Using 1 equiv of BF3•OEt2
To demonstrate the utility of this newly developed
methodology, we synthesized a variety of F-BODIPYs
(Scheme 3, Table 2) including those with meso-H and
meso-Ph substituents. Substituted and unsubstituted pyr-
rolic skeletons were well-tolerated by the new methodol-
ogy, as were conjugated and alkanoate esters. In all cases,
isolation of the desired product was facile: the reaction
mixtures were filtered over a pad of Celite (or Celite and
silica) to produce yields typically >80%. Notably, the
unsymmetrical F-BODIPY 2BF2 was synthesized in high
yield using this method, without the observation of
scrambled products (Table 2, entry 2).
Furthermore, this new procedure is scalable (Table 2,
entry 3). As the reaction only requires 1 equiv of BF3•OEt2,
and no NEt3, the previously observed BF3•NEt3 bypro-
duct is not produced and therefore isolation of the
F-BODIPY products is significantly easier. Furthermore,
the reaction was scaled to 1 g, outside of the glovebox,
under an inert atmosphere using anhydrous conditions to
result in a 94% isolated yield of 3BF2 (Table 2, entry 3c). It
should be noted that the F-BODIPY 3BF2 could also be
prepared by reacting the free-base dipyrrin 3 with 1 equiv
of BF3•OEt2 (without formation of the intermediate
lithium dipyrrinato complex), such as with the formation
of Cl-BODIPYs.15 However, this reaction produced lower
yields (50%) compared to the method involving in situ
formation of the lithium salt (94%).
a Glovebox, 50 mg scale. b Glovebox, 250 mg scale. c Inert atmo-
sphere conditions outside of glovebox, 1 g scale.
in situ as the F-BODIPY upon the addition of 6 equiv of
TEA and 9 equiv of BF3•OEt2:2 using this approach, we
obtained 5BF2 in 50% yield from the corresponding di-
pyrromethane, after column chromatography (Scheme 4).
We compared this approach to our new strategy, again
starting from the dipyrromethane. Thus, 3.3 equiv of
LiHMDS and then just 1 equiv of BF3•OEt2 were added
to the reaction mixture directly after the oxidation reaction
involving DDQ. The reaction was performed under nitro-
gen, and the workup required an acid/base wash followed
by a simple filtration through a pad of silica, rather than
chromatography per se, to afford pure 5BF2 in 52% yield
on an 800 mg scale, outside the glovebox, again demonstrat-
ing scalability and practicality. Thus, our new methodol-
ogy is easily melded with the much-trusted route from
dipyrromethanes that bypasses the need to isolate/purify
dipyrrins or their HX salts.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of F-BODIPYs from Dipyrrinato Lithium
Salts Using 1 equiv of BF3•OEt2
A common approach for synthesizing F-BODIPYs in-
volves oxidation of the corresponding dipyrromethane
with DDQ to form the free-base dipyrrin which is trapped
(15) Lundrigan, T.; Crawford, S. M.; Cameron, T. S.; Thompson, A.
Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1003–1005.
(14) Scharf, A. B.; Betley, T. A. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 6837–6845.
2160
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 8, 2012