2556
P. M. Bahadduri et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 2555–2557
Table 1. Predicted activities of Alexa Fluor-350TM derivatives from
CoMFA analysis
designed five novel Alexa Fluor 350TM (AF)-labeled pep-
tide analogs using computational design, synthesis, and
in vitro analysis of AF-labeled substrates designed spe-
cifically to target PEPT1.
Compounds
ÀlogKi
Ki (mM)
AF–LysGly
AF–LysVal
AF–LysSer
AF–LysAla
AF–LysGlyGly
4.550
4.459
4.590
4.611
4.700
0.028
0.035
0.026
0.024
0.019
We built a three-dimensional quantitative structure–
activity relationship (3D-QSAR) using Comparative
Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) from the extensive
dataset by Gebauer and colleagues.9 Molecules were
built and subsequently energy minimized in SYBYL
(v.7.1) using the Tripos force field.10 The most active
compound in the dataset, o-(methylphenyl)-D-tyrosyl-
L-alanine9 was used as a template and all the other mol-
ecules were superimposed to it using atom-based align-
ment. The resulting CoMFA steric and electrostatic
contour plots are shown in Figure 1. The model devel-
oped has good descriptive ability as evidenced by a r2
value of 0.989 with six components.
desired product. All in vitro studies were conducted with
stably transfected CHO cell lines expressing hPEPT1 as
described previously.8 Competitive inhibition studies
were performed at pH 6.0 for 30 min using [3H]-glycyl-
sarcosine (GlySar) (1 lM, 1 Ci/mmol) (Moravek, Brea,
CA) as a tracer. Initially, parent peptides were assessed
for their inhibitory potencies of [3H]-GlySar uptake in
hPEPT1-CHO cells. Subsequently, the inhibition of
100 lM and 1000 lM AF-labeled peptides (in DMSO,
not exceeding 1% final DMSO concentration) on [3H]-
GlySar (1 lM) accumulation in hPEPT1-CHO cells
was determined. To determine the cellular uptake of fluo-
rescently labeled peptides and to assess their mutual
competitive inhibition of GlySar, the effect of 10 mM
GlySar (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) on the uptake of
100 lM AF-labeled dipeptide was assayed in hPEPT1-
CHO cells. Cells were washed three times and lysed with
1 N NaOH for 1 h and neutralized with 10% HCl solu-
tion. Total cellular fluorescence was determined using a
Spectramax Gemini XS (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale,
CA). Data were calibrated using fluorescence standard
curves and normalized to protein content.
The overall steric contribution (53%) to binding is high-
er than the electrostatic contribution (47%). The AF
analogs (Table 1) using pKi (ÀlogKi) (M) as dependent
variable and CoMFA descriptors as independent vari-
ables in the partial least square (PLS) analysis (data
not shown). Out of a set of 50 permutations, the five
highest scoring compounds were selected for synthesis
and in vitro testing.
The synthesis of dipeptide-conjugated AF (Molecular
Probes, Eugene, OR) was carried out by dissolving
BocLys(Z)OSu in a mixture of N,N-dimethyl formamide
(DMF), 1,4-dioxane, diisopropylamine (DIEA), and an
appropriate amino acid or dipeptide (Scheme 1). The
progress of the reaction was monitored by mass spectros-
copy for the disappearance of a peak at m/z 478.5. The
dipeptide is then deprotected by catalytic hydrogenation
using 10% Pd/C to remove the carbonyloxybenzyl (Z)
group. The deprotected compound was dissolved in
DMF, dioxane, and diisopropylethylamine followed by
the addition of AF carboxylic acid succinimidyl ester
to give the fluorescently labeled dipeptide. This was final-
ly deprotected using TFA in dichloromethane to give the
AF-labeled peptides have strong affinity for hPEPT1 as
demonstrated by their potent inhibition of [3H]-GlySar
uptake in hPEPT1-transfected CHO cells (Fig. 2).
Reduction in hPEPT1 affinity imparted by AF-conjuga-
tion is minimal as compared to the activity of the parent
peptide (Fig. 2). Of the compounds tested, the LysVal,
LysSer, and LysAla analogs showed the strongest rela-
tive inhibition of [3H]-GlySar uptake. Interestingly, the
cellular uptake of AF-labeled LysVal was significantly
greater (2- to 3-fold) compared to the other peptides
(Fig. 3). This would indicate that inhibition data do
not correlate with hPEPT1-mediated substrate translo-
cation. Inhibition of AF-labeled peptide uptake by a
100-fold GlySar excess indicates mutual inhibition be-
tween GlySar and AF-labeled analogs, indicative of a
shared translocation pathway, that is, hPEPT1
(Fig. 3). Interestingly, the LysVal conjugate of AF dis-
plays relatively high cellular uptake while only modestly
inhibiting [3H]-GlySar uptake (ꢀ40% at 1 mM), whereas
LysAla and LysSer conjugates exerted stronger [3H]-
GlySar uptake inhibition (<ꢀ22%) with only modest
cellular permeation. This would suggest that AF–LysVal
is a good substrate for PEPT1 compared to the other
dipeptide conjugates, but further studies are warranted
to fully characterize this phenomenon.
Figure 1. CoMFA contour map. The green and yellow regions indicate
that an increase in steric bulk favors or disfavors binding to hPEPT1,
respectively. The increase of negative charge near red region or positive
charge near blue region favors binding. The template compound is
shown in capped stick model.
Overall, AF offers significant advantages over other re-
ported fluorescently labeled peptides such as a large
Stokes shift (100 nm for AF vs 30 nm for FITC) and a
relatively high fluorescence quantum yield (0.89 AF–