Scheme 2. Total Syntheses of 7(S)-Hydroxymatairesinol 2 and 7(S)-Hydroxyarctigenin 6a
a Key: (a) 18 (1.8 equiv), n-Bu2BOTf (2 equiv), NEt3 (2.6 equiv), CH2Cl2, then 17 (1 equiv), -78 to 0 °C, 1 h, then H2O2, pH 7.2 buffer,
Et2O, 25 °C, 48 h; (b) TBSOTf (1.2 equiv), 2,6-lutidine (1.8 equiv), CH2Cl2, 25 °C, 0.5 h, overall yields from 17: 20a, 83%; 20b, 92%;
(c) NaBH4 (10 equiv), THF-H2O, 25 °C, 16 h, 21a, 77%; 21b, 85%; (d) m-CPBA (1.5 equiv), CH2Cl2, 40 °C, 2 h, 98%; (e) K2CO3 (1
equiv), MeOH, 25 °C, 10 min, 90%; (f) DBU (1.6 equiv), CH2Cl2, 25 °C, 0.5 h, then CSCl2 (4.3 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 20 min, 100%; (g)
21 (1 equiv), pyridine (2 equiv), 23 (1.2 equiv), CH2Cl2, 2 h, 24a, 81%; 24b, 88%; (h) (Me3Si)3SiH (1.1 equiv), AIBN (0.4 equiv added
over 6 h), PhH, 80 °C, 25a, 44%; 25b, 44%; (i) n-Bu4NF (15 equiv), AcOH (15 equiv), THF, 25 °C, 96 h, 2, 90%; 6, 86%.
(>95%) trans-diastereoselectivity with (Me3Si)3SiH as re-
agent. Removal of the silyl protecting groups furnished the
7(S)-hydroxy lignans. Spectroscopic and physical data for
synthetic 7(S)-hydroxymatairesinol 2 were in good agreement
with data reported for this compound.20 In contrast, charac-
terization data collected on synthetic 7(S)-hydroxyarctigenin
6 were not in accord with literature13,14 figures. We suspected
that the stereochemistry of this natural product had been
incorrectly assigned in these previous investigations. To
clarify this issue, we pursued the preparation of 7, the 7(R)-
diastereoisomer of 6. The results of this and related chemistry
is depicted in Scheme 3. Inversion of the C7-hydroxy group
of 6 was achieved under modified Mitsunobu conditions.21
Spectroscopic and physical data for synthetic 7(R)-hydroxy-
arctigenin 7 was in good agreement with literature data for
natural 7-hydroxyarctigenin.13,14 We therefore conclude that
the stereochemistry of the natural product has been incor-
rectly assigned.22
be carried out in the presence of a free C4′ phenol (6 f 7
and 6 f 8, respectively), a free phenolic residue at C4 caused
these reactions to fail. Thus, access to oxygenated mataires-
inol natural products 3 and 4 was by way of the silyl-
protected compound 30. Spectroscopic and physical data for
synthetic 7(R)-hydroxymatairesinol 3 and 7-oxomatairesinol
4 were in good agreement with literature data.12,20 Hydro-
genolytic deoxygenation of the benzylic alcohol group23 (2
f 1; 6 f 5) afforded samples of (-)-matairesinol and (-)-
arctigenin.24
The synthetic potential of these compounds was further
exemplified by their ready conversion into aryl tetrahy-
dronaphthalene (2 f 28; 6 f 29)25 and dibenzocyclooctane
(5 f 27)26 lignan skeletons. Once again, characterization
data for (-)-R-conidendrin 28 (and the corresponding
monomethyl ether 29) prepared by this route matched those
reported in the literature for the natural product.27
Interestingly, whereas both Mitsunobu inversion and
Parikh-Doering oxidation of the C7-hydroxyl group could
(23) Enders, D.; Lausberg, V.; Del Signore, G.; Berner, O. M. Synthesis
2002, 515-522.
(24) Spectroscopic and physical data were in excellent agreement with
literature data for (-)-arctigenin and (-)-matairesinol: Rahman, M. M.;
Dewick, P. M.; Jackson, D. E.; Lucas, J. A. Phytochemistry 1990, 29, 1971-
1980. See also refs 4a and 12.
(25) Nishibe, S.; Tsukamoto, H.; Hisada, S.; Yamanouchi, S.; Takido,
M. Chem. Parm. Bull. 1981, 29, 2082-2085. See also ref 12.
(26) Hughes, D. D.; Ward, R. S. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 4015-4022.
(20) Mattinen, J.; Sjo¨holm, R.; Ekman, R. ACH Models Chem. 1998,
135, 583-590. The authors of this paper incorrectly assigned the configura-
tions of the two 7-hydroxymatairesinol diastereoisomers. This error was
recently corrected following X-ray analysis. See ref 11d.
(21) Martin, S. F.; Dodge, J. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 3017-3020.
(22) See the Supporting Information for full details.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 9, 2004
1347