Y. Qian et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 7 (2004) 459–461
461
Table 2
Propylene dimerization with complex 1a
Entry
Activityb
Reaction conditions
Distribution of C6-olefin (%)
Cocatalyst
Ratioc
1-Hexene
Others
1
2
3
4
MAO
AlEt3
Ni(COD)2
–
1000
500
2
132
38.1
24.3
0
78.4
26.5
76.0
–
21.6
73.5
24.0
–
–
a Conditions: 1.74 lmol of complex 1, solvent: toluene, total volume: 30 ml, propylene pressure: 1 atm, temperature: 25 °C, reaction time: 0.5 h.
b kg oligomers/(mol Niꢀh).
c The ratio of cocat. and cat.
MAO > AlEt3 > Ni(COD)2. Amongst them, 1/MAO
catalytic system shows the highest activity up to 132 kg
oligomers/(mol Ni h) (entry 1). Notably, 1-hexene is the
major product in entries 1 and 3. The fact that 1 can give
out low carbon olefins indicates the consequence
that chain transfer is faster than chain propagation in
ethylene and propylene oligomerization because of
the elimination of axial steric bulk in d8 square-planar
system [17].
References
[1] S. Mecking, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 40 (2001) 534.
[2] S.D. Ittel, L.K. Johnson, M. Brookhart, Chem. Rev. 100 (2000)
1169.
[3] V.C. Gibson, S.K. Spitzmesser, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003) 283.
[4] W. Keim, F.H. Kowaldt, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 17
(1978) 466.
[5] U. Klabunde, S.D. Ittel, J. Mol. Catal. 41 (1987) 123.
[6] L.K. Johnson, C.M. Killian, M. Brookhart, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
117 (1995) 6414.
In summary, neutral arylnickel(II) phosphine com-
plex 1 with chelating oxazoline ligand represents a novel
kind of efficient olefin oligomerization catalyst. The
molecular weight distribution of olefin oligomers greatly
depends on the selection of cocatalysts or phosphine
scavenger in catalytic system. A series of study on neu-
tral nickel(II) catalysts containing substituted 2-oxaz-
olinylphenolato ligand towards olefin oligomerization
are also now in progress.
[7] S. Fernandes, M.M. Marques, S.G. Correia, Joao Mano, J.C.W.
Chien, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 201 (2000) 2566.
[8] C. Wang, S. Friedrich, et al., Organometallics 17 (1998) 3149.
[9] P.A. Cameron, V.C. Gibson, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39
(2000) 2141.
€
[10] W. Klaui, J. Bongards, G.J. Reiꢁ, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39
(2000) 3894.
[11] Yuesheng Li, Yanrong Li, et al., J. Organomet. Chem. 667 (2003)
185.
[12] C. Carlini, M. Isola, V. Liuzzo, et al., Appl. Catal. A 231 (2002)
307.
ꢂ
[13] Crystal data for 1: triclinic, space group P1; a ¼ 9:5314ð13Þ;
ꢀ
b ¼ 12:5616ð17Þ; c ¼ 13:6247ð19Þ A, a ¼ 70:768ð3Þ; b ¼ 79:498ð2Þ;
3
ꢁ1
.
ꢀ
c ¼ 81:044ð3Þ°; V ¼ 1506:4ð4Þ A , Z ¼ 2, and l ¼ 0:731 mm
Acknowledgements
The structure was solved by direct methods and refined by full
matrix least-squares procedures: R1 ¼ 0:0502, Rw ¼ 0:0883 for
6704 reflections.
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the
Special Funds for Major State Basic Research Projects
(1999064801), the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (20072004), and the research fund for the
doctoral program of higher education (20020251002).
[14] S.Y. Desjardins, K.J. Cavell, et al., J. Organomet. Chem. 544
(1997) 163.
[15] B.Y. Lee, G.C. Bazan, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 5352.
[16] F.A. Hicks, M. Brookhart, Organometallics 20 (2001) 3217.
[17] R. Soula, J.P. Broyer, et al., Macromolecules 34 (2001) 2438.