1354
L. Zhang et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 23 (2012) 1352–1354
Table 3
Studies on the reuse of [bmim]OH in the preparation of 4b.
Rounda
1
2
3
4
5
6
Yieldb (%)
85
83
83
82
81
80
a
All reaction were run with 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (1b, 1 mmol), chloroacetonitrile (2, 1 mmol) and benzenesulfinic acid sodium salt (3, 1 mmol),
and 2 mL solvent.
b
Isolated yield.
yields and shorter reaction time). Meanwhile, the presence of electron-donating groups decreases the reaction rate. So,
it is concluded that the electronic nature of the substituents on aldehydes has some effect on this reaction. However,
when the aliphatic aldehyde was applied to this reaction, no expected product obtained, we attributed this to the slow
formation and unstable nature of the product formed from the aliphatic aldehydes examined. In this study, the products
1
4g–l were new compounds, which were characterized by mp, IR, H NMR, 13C NMR, mass spectroscopy [12].
As a green catalyst, the recovery and reuse of ionic liquid was very important in green synthetic process. Therefore,
we studied on the reuse of [bmim]OH on the optimized reaction conditions. As shown in Table 3, the ionic liquid
[bmim]OH could be successively recovered and reused for five times without remarkable loss in the catalytic activity.
In summary, the highly functionalized a,b-unsaturated arylsulfonesare are of intense attention because of their
useful temporary activating groups, and thus an efficient procedure for their synthesis is of high importance. The
present procedure using a novel and convenient multicomponent reaction in the present of green catalyst provides a
high yielding synthesis of a,b-unsaturated arylsulfonesare. The other advantage of this procedure is the reusability of
ionic liquids.
Typical procedure: The mixture of the aromatic aldehyde 1 (1 mmol), chloroacetonitrile 2 (1 mmol),
benzenesulfinic acid sodium salt 3 (1 mmol) and [bmim]OH (10%) in EtOH (2 mL) was stirred under reflux for
the appropriate time (monitored by thin-layer chromatography [TLC]). After completion of the reaction, the solid
product was collected by filtration and recrystallized from ethanol to give the pure compound 4. The filtrate was
poured into 10 mL of water, extracted with diethyl ether several times to remove unreacted aromatic aldehyde,
chloroacetonitrile and other organic contaminations. Then the water was evaporated under reduced pressure and
centrifugated to recover the ionic liquid for subsequent use.
References
[1] (a) P.D. Magnus, Tetrahedron 33 (1977) 2019;
(b) B.M. Trost, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 61 (1988) 107;
(c) A. Orita, N. Yoshioka, J. Oteru, Chem. Lett. (1997) 1023.
[2] Z. Zhang, G.J. Liu, Y.L. Wang, et al. Synth. Commun. 19 (1989) 1167.
[3] B.M. Trost, N.R. Schmuff, M.J. Miller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102 (1980) 5979.
[4] M. Julia, D. Arnould, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. (1973) 743.
[5] (a) O.A. Watanabe, A. Otera, J. Chem. Lett. (1997) 1025;
(b) P.P. Patel, M.E. Welker, L.M. Liable-Sands, et al. Organometallics 16 (1997) 4519;
(c) A.D. Phillips, E.S. Warren, G.H. Whitham, Tetrahedron 53 (1997) 307.
[6] H.K. Jacobs, A.S. Gopalan, J. Org. Chem. 59 (1994) 2014.
[7] (a) K. Blades, D. Lapotre, J.M. Percy, Tetrahedron Lett. (1976) 5895;
(b) R. Giovannini, M. Petrini, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 19 (1997) 12101.
[8] (a) M.J. Climent, A. Corma, R. Guil-Lopez, et al. J. Catal. Lett. 59 (1999) 33;
(b) S. Sebti, A. Smahi, A. Solhy, Tetrahedron Lett. 43 (2002) 1813.
[9] (a) B.M. Trost, T.R. Verh œven, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100 (1978) 3435;
(b) B.M. Trost, T.R. Verh œven, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99 (1977) 8116.
[10] K. Kondo, D. Tunemoto, Tetrahedron Lett. 16 (1975) 1007.
[11] G.L. Olson, H.O. Cheung, K.D. Morgan, et al. J. Org. Chem. 41 (1976) 3287.
[12] Some selected data: compound 4k: mp 160–161 8C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 9.15 (s, 1H), 8.26 (d, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz), 8.06–8.12 (m, 4H),
7.94 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.61–7.58 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 148.9, 137.8, 134.7, 134.3, 133.5, 131.6, 129.7; 129.3, 128.7, 128.3, 128.2,
127.1, 126.7, 125.3, 122.5, 117.0, 113.0. IR vmax (KBr): 3020, 2200, 1595 cm–1. MS (EI, 70 eV) (m/z, %): 319.3 (M, 25.1), 177.4 (100), 151.5
(9.4), 51.3 (5.5). 4l: mp 179–180 8C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.12 (s, 1H), 8.03 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.60–7.41 (m, 5H), 7.01 (d, 1H,
J = 8.2 Hz), 6.29(s, 1H), 3.96 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 151.7, 151.5, 147.0, 138.6, 134.3, 129.6, 128.9, 128.4, 122.9, 115.2, 113.9, 111.0,
110.7, 56.2. IR vmax (KBr): d 3059, 2222, 1576 cmÀ1. MS (EI, 70 eV) (m/z, %): 316.2 (M+1, 11.0), 173.3 (100), 158.2 (22.7), 130.3 (7.9), 51.2
(11.0).