DMF mixture. Under these conditions any unreacted EDCI/HOBt
remains in the aqueous phase, thus allowing the use of excess
activating agent without incompatibility with the coupling partner
11. Amide 20 was obtained in 50% yield as a single diastereoisomer
after purification.
After some experimentation, final deprotection of 20 was
achieved by hydrogenation in the presence of Pd/C in THF under
TFA activation, yielding the TFA salt of belactosin A. Although
this material could be taken to its isoelectric pH (as determined by
1H NMR spectroscopy using 5% NaHCO3/D2O), subsequent
purification to remove sodium trifluoroacetate proved troublesome.
Further consideration suggested that the free amino acid could be
generated directly if we used a volatile acid catalyst with a higher
pKa than that of the carboxylate group in 20. Pleasingly, when the
reaction was carried out using H2 and Pd/C in a 3 : 2 THF/HCO2H
solvent mixture the desired amino acid 1 was produced in 96%
yield. The synthetic sample (m.p. 186–187 °C, [a]2D1+4.8 (c 0.84,
H2O) (lit.2a m.p 184–185 °C, [a]D27+4.8 (c 0.37, H2O)) displayed
satisfactory HRMS data, and its TLC Rf value (0.5, butanol : acetic
1
acid : water (71 : 14 : 15 v/v/v)), H and 13C NMR spectra were
identical to those reported for the natural product.2a
In conclusion, we have completed the first total synthesis of
belactosin A 1. The synthetic strategy, particularly the knowledge
gained from the synthesis of the central 3-(trans-2-aminocyclopro-
pyl)alanine core 8 and the conditions for coupling 11 to the
sensitive b-lactone unit 3, will now facilitate the preparation of a
wide range of synthetic probes of some significant biological
pathways. Studies along these lines are currently underway.
We thank the EPSRC (studentship to JNS) for support of this
work. We are grateful to Pfizer, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and
Bristol-Myers Squibb for unrestricted support of our research
programmes. We thank Dr. A. Asai of Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co.
Ltd. for supplying the 1H NMR spectrum of 1 and Dr. A. J. P. White
for X-ray structure determination.
Scheme 3 (a) H2NOSO3H/KOH (aq), 0 °C to rt, 74%; (b) (COCl)2, CH2Cl2,
0 °C to rt, 80%; (c) (4R)-benzyl-2-oxazolidinone, nBuLi 278 °C, 79%; (d)
tert-butyl bromoacetate, NaHMDS, 278 °C, 82%; (e) LiOH (aq), H2O2, 0
°C to rt, 92%; (f) 2 eq LiHMDS, CCl4, 278 °C to rt; then ether/NaHCO3,
55%; (g) TFA/CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 20 h, 90%.
Notes and references
Fig. 1 X-Ray structure of b-lactone 19.
1 C. M. Crews and R. Mohan, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2000, 4, 47.
2 (a) T. Mizukami, A. Asai, Y. Yamashita, R. Katahira, A. Hasegawa, K.
Ochiai and S. Akinaga, Eur. Patent 768317, 1997 (Chem. Abstr., 1997,
126, 338840) (b) A. Asai, A. Hasegawa, K. Ochiai, Y. Yamashita and T.
Mizukami, J. Antibiot., 2000, 53, 81; (c) K. Yasuki, I. Atsushi, T.
Yoshiichi, S. Shiro and A. Shiro, Jpn. Patent 2002047202, 2002 (Chem.
Abstr., 2002, 136, 172760).
3 A. Asai, T. Tsujita, S. V. Sharma, Y. Yamashita, S. Akinaga, M.
Funakoshi, H. Kobayashi and T. Mizukami, Biochem. Pharmacol.,
2004, 67, 227.
4 C. Garcia-Echeverria, Mini-Rev. Med. Chem., 2002, 2, 247.
5 For synthetic studies, see: (a) M. Brandl, S. I. Kozhushkov, K. Loscha,
O. V. Kokoreva, D. S. Yufit, J. A. K. Howard and A. de Meijere, Synlett,
2000, 1741; (b) A. Armstrong and J. N. Scutt, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 2331;
(c) D. Diez, P. Garcia, I. S. Marcos, N. M. Garrido, P. Basabe, H. B.
Broughton and J. G. Urones, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 3687; (d) R. P. Jain and
J. C. Vederas, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 4669; (e) O. V. Larionov, S. I.
Kozhushkov, M. Brandl and A. de Meijere, Mendeleev Commun., 2003,
199.
With both fragments 11 and 3 in hand we were in a position to
attempt the crucial coupling, with the ambitious aim of avoiding
additional protection steps by selective activation of the b-lactone
carboxylic acid 3 for direct coupling to the amino acid 11.
However, preliminary experiments in which 3 was mixed with 1 eq
DCC/2 eq HOBt/DMF prior to addition to a solution of 11 in
EtNiPr2/DMF gave only 25% of the coupling product. We
suspected that conversion of 3 to its active ester was incomplete,
but in this case use of excess DCC was not possible since any
unreacted activating agent was likely to consume amino acid 11.
This problem was solved by exploiting biphasic conditions in
which 3 was converted to the active ester through brief exposure to
2 eq EDCI/4 eq HOBt in CH2Cl2/H2O at 0 °C (Scheme 4),11
followed by transfer of the organic phase to a cooled 11/EtNiPr2/
6 (a) E. J. Corey, F. Xu and M. C. Noe, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119,
12414; (b) B. Lygo and P. G. Wainwright, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38,
8595.
7 R. P. Beckett, M. J. Crimmin, M. H. Davis and Z. Spavold, Synlett,
1993, 137.
8 B. Barlaam, G. T. Bird, C. Lambert-van der Brempt, D. Campbell, S. J.
Foster and R. Maciewicz, J. Med. Chem., 1999, 42, 4890.
9 G. A. Doldouras and J. Kollonitsch, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 1, 341.
10 J. S. Bajwa and M. J. Miller, J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 1114.
11 This two-phase system has previously been used for direct amide
formation without isolation of the active ester. G-J. Ho, K. M. Emerson,
D. J. Mathre, R. F. Shuman and E. J. J. Grabowski, J. Org. Chem., 1995,
60, 3569.
Scheme 4 (a) EDCI/HOBt in CH2Cl2/H2O, 0 °C; then 11/EtNiPr2/DMF, 0
°C, 50%; (b) Pd/C, H2, THF/HCO2H (3 : 2), 96%.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 5 1 0 – 5 1 1
511