Organometallics 2004, 23, 2205-2208
2205
Liga n d -Ba sed Red u ction a n d Electr on -Tr a n sfer -In d u ced
Tu b-to-Ch a ir Isom er iza tion of Cycloocta tetr a en e Liga n d
in Rh (η5-C5P h 5)(η4-C8H8)
Michael J . Shaw,*,†,§ J ulie Hyde,‡ Colin White,‡ and William E. Geiger*,†
Departments of Chemistry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405, and
University of Sheffield, Brook Hill, Sheffield S3 7HF, England
Received November 17, 2003
Summary: The electrochemical reduction of Rh(η5-
C5Ph5)(η4-C8H8), 1, has been studied in THF/ 0.1 M
[NBu4]A, where A ) [PF6]- or [CF3SO3]-. Cyclic, dif-
ferential pulse, and square-wave voltammetry establish
that 1 exists as two isomers having tub-shaped (1,5-
bonded) or chair-shaped (1,3-bonded) cyclooctatetraene
(COT) ligands. The former is the major isomer at room
temperature. One-electron reduction of 1,5-1 (Epc ≈ -2.7
V vs ferrocene) results in rapid isomerization to the chair
isomer. Electrolysis produces [1,3-1]- (E1/ 2 ) -2.37 V),
which has ESR spectra consistent with a SOMO that is
largely (COT) ligand-based. Equilibrium and rate con-
stants are estimated for a square scheme describing the
combined electron-transfer/ isomerization sequence. The
tub isomer is more highly favored at room temperature
for Rh(η5-C5Ph5)(COT) than for the previously studied
Co(η5-C5H5)(COT). Because the redox behavior of 1
closely parallels that of the cobalt analogues, the present
result strengthens evidence for the decidedly different
electronic structures of nominally isoelectronic Co-group
versus Ni-group η4-COT compounds. Formally d9 com-
plexes of the former are classified as highly delocalized
“18 + δ” complexes, whereas the latter are more tradi-
tional 19-electron systems.
complexes of the type Co(η5-C5R5)(COT), R ) H or
Me.2-7 The 1,5-isomer, which is favored in the 18-
electron neutral compounds, converts rapidly and quan-
titatively to the 1,3-isomer in the radical anion. To date
only cobalt compounds have been shown to produce
such interconversions. By way of contrast, isoelectronic
nickel-group analogues retain their 1,5-COT geometry
in both the 18- and 19-electron forms of the complexes
[M(η5-C5R5)(COT)]z, M ) Ni, R) H, Me; M ) Pd, R )
Ph; z ) +1, 0.2 Extended Hu¨ckel calculations4 and ESR
measurements2,3 showed that the contrasting redox
behavior originates in electronic structure differences
of the Co-group versus Ni-group compounds. The SOMO
of the former is highly delocalized, with at least half of
the orbital residing in the COT ring, whereas that of
the latter is essentially metal-based (mostly dyz).
A point of inquiry is whether Co-group COT com-
pounds of the second or third row exhibit tub/chair
ligand isomerization processes in the 18-electron or 19-
electron systems. With this in mind, we chose to study
the reduction of Rh(η5-C5Ph5)(COT), 1. There is ample
precedence for significantly different reductive electron-
transfer behavior of 18 e- sandwich or half-sandwich
compounds involving either first- or second-row metals
in general,8,9 or Co and Rh in particular.9 In the present
case, however, although there are quantitative differ-
ences in the tub/chair equilibrium constants for the
neutral compounds of the two metals, their overall
behavior is quite similar. As will be shown below, the
favored tub bonding of the cyclooctatetraene ligand in
Rh(η5-C5Ph5)(1,5-COT) is replaced by chair bonding in
the mononanion [Rh(η5-C5Ph5)(1,3-COT)]-. The behavior
of the Co- and Rh-COT anion radicals appears to be
In tr od u ction
The cyclooctatetraene (COT) ligand has been shown
to have a number of possible coordination modes for
π-bonding to a transition metal.1,2 In the two most
common coordination geometries for tetrahapto-bonding
to a single metal, the COT ligand adopts either a tub-
or chairlike shape,2 where the latter (1,3) isomer
involves butadiene-like coordination of adjacent double
bonds. Isomerization between the 1,5- and 1,3-isomers
(3) (a) Moraczewski, J .; Geiger, W. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101,
3407. (b) Moraczewski, J .; Geiger, W. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103,
4779.
(4) Albright, T. A.; Geiger, W. E.; Moraczewski, J .; Tulyathan, B. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4787.
(5) Geiger, W. E.; Gennett, T.; Grzeszczuk, M.; Lane, G. A.; Morac-
zewski, J .; Salzer, A.; Smith, D. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 7454.
(6) Grzeszczuk, M.; Smith, D. E.; Geiger, W. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1983, 105, 1772.
(7) Richards, T. C.; Geiger, W. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2028.
(8) Leading references: (a) Veiros, L. F. Organometallics 2000, 19,
5549. (b) Gusev, O. V.; Ievlev, M. A.; Peterleitner, M. G.; Peregudova,
S. M.; Denisovich, L. I.; Petrovskii, P. V.; Ustynyuk, N. A. J .
Organomet. Chem. 1997, 534, 57. (c) O’Connor, J . M.; Casey, C. P.
Chem. Rev. 1987, 87, 307. (d) Poli, R. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2135. (e)
Siegbahn, P. E. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1487. (f) Ziegler, T.;
Tschinke, V.; Fan, L.; Becke, A. D. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 9177.
(9) (a) Zagorevskii, D. V.; Holmes, J . L. Organometallics 1992, 11,
3224, and references therein concerning cobaltocene and rhodocene.
(b) Connelly, N. G.; Geiger, W. E.; Lane, G. A.; Raven, S. J .; Rieger, P.
H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 6219. (c) Geiger, W. E. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1995, 28, 351.
is well-known for a number of cobalt-COT compounds
and is greatly facilitated by one-electron reduction of
† University of Vermont.
‡ University of Sheffield.
§ Present address: Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville.
(1) Deganello, G. Transition Metal Complexes of Cyclic Polyolefins;
Academic Press: New York, 1979; Chapter 2.
(2) Geiger, W. E.; Rieger, P. H.; Corbato, C.; Edwin, J .; Fonseca, E.;
Lane, G. A.; Mevs, J . M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2314.
10.1021/om030661f CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
Publication on Web 03/31/2004