Svennebring et al.
SCHEME 3
found that decreased catalyst loading afforded better
results.29 We believe that the high regiocontrol indicates
that 3 acts as a catalyst reservoir30 for Pd(0) and that
the release of the underligated metal(0) is accelerated
by water under our high-temperature conditions (Scheme
3). In addition, the aggregation rate of Pd(0) is probably
of higher order than the reaction rate, since lowering the
catalytic load prolongs the active catalyst lifetime.
We have shown that diverse aryl bromides can be used
in microwave-heated, chelation-controlled diarylations of
vinyl ethers. Thus, the metal presenting dimethylami-
noethyl group does not only provide high â,â-selectivity
at high reaction temperatures, but also enhances the
reactivity of the double bond. We strongly believe that
the concept of chelation-promoted multiarylations can be
successfully applied also to cyclic Heck substrates. Fi-
nally, with support from the obtained high regioselectiv-
ity we postulate a traditional Pd(0)/Pd(II) catalytic cycle
with Herrmann’s palladacycle serving as an efficient
palladium(0) source.
substituted 2g (entry 2). The somewhat lowered â-selec-
tivity and the poor yield encountered with 2g is probably
a consequence of steric congestions in the insertion step,
requiring high temperature and long reaction time. The
broad scope of aryl substrates usable in the Heck reaction
manifests itself in the reactions with electron-rich N,N-
dimethylamino-substituted 2f and heteroaromatic 2j,
both delivering usable yields (entries 1 and 7). As
experienced in the one-pot arylations (Table 1), the
selectivities and yields in Table 2 were rather insensitive
to the employed reaction temperatures allowing for high-
temperature reactions with reaction times down to only
10 min (entries 3, 4, and 8, Table 2). The last introduced
aryl substituent preferred the Z-position in all cases.
Thus, by switching the order of arylation, the opposite
geometrical isomer of 6d could be preferentially synthe-
sized (entries 4 and 5, Table 2). The introduction of a
second phenyl group to monophenylated 5a (entry 8,
Table 2) proceeded with a higher â,â-selectivity than the
one-pot double phenylation procedure starting directly
from 1 (entry 3, Table 1). The reduced performance of
the tandem arylation is possibly explained by a catalytic
aging process (e.g., Pd-black formation), rendering the
second phenylation in the one-pot protocol less regiose-
lective.
The potential for 3 to catalyze chelation-controlled
regioselective â,â-arylations of vinyl ethers was illus-
trated in the previous section. Whereas the preparative
advantages are clear, the oxidation state of the active
metal is not obvious. The square planar 16e- π-species
A is commonly accepted as key intermediate with the
Pd(0)/Pd(II) redox mechanism, directing the insertion via
chelation to afford terminal arylation (Scheme 3).6,13 With
a Pd(II)/Pd(IV)-based catalytic cycle, a possible nitrogen-
coordinated octahedral alkeneic Pd(IV) π-intermediate
must be postulated before the regiocontrolling migratory
insertion step. If the Pd(II)/Pd(IV) pathway was active,
and not the more widely recognized Pd(0)/Pd(II) route,
some difference in regioselectivity should be expected.
Performing the reactions with classic Pd(0)-generating
standard precatalysts such as Pd(OAc)2/PPh3, Pd(OAc)2/
P(o-tol)3, or Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 does not give any substantial
difference in stereo- or regioselectivity,26 but only in
conversion and yield. Furthermore, Herrmann has re-
ported a similar distribution of isomers in the Heck
arylation of nonchelating butyl vinyl ether with both
palladacycle 3 and with classic Pd(OAc)2.27
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for Sym m etr ic Dia r yla tion s (Ta ble
1). The following chemicals were added to a thick-walled
tube: 3 (3.2 µmol, 3.0 mg), LiCl (1.32 mmol, 56.0 mg), NaOAc
(0.880 mmol, 72.2 mg), K2CO3 (1.43 mmol, 198 mg), aryl
bromide 2 (quantity according to entry), olefin 1 (0.651 mmol,
75.0 mg), DMF (2 mL), and water (0.20 mL). The tube was
then sealed under air, and the contents were magnetically
stirred and microwave-heated at a specified temperature for
an appropriate time (see Table 1 for details). After cooling,
the reaction mixture was diluted with dietyl ether and washed
twice with 0.1 M NaOH. The combined aqueous phases were
additionally extracted three times with diethyl ether. The
etheral phases were combined and dried with K2CO3 (s). After
evaporation of the solvent, silica column chromatography was
performed using gradient elution (Et2O/isohexane) containing
triethylamine (1%).
N,N-Dim et h yl-2-[(2,2-d i-p -a n isyl)et h en yloxy]et h a n -
a m in e (4a ). Yellowish oil, 52% yield (0.111 g, reaction
performed at 180 °C, 10 min, >95% by GC-MS). 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.38 (d, J ) 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (d, J ) 8.7 Hz,
2H), 6.86 (d, J ) 8.9 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (d, J ) 8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.40 (s,
1H), 4.01 (t, J ) 6.1 Hz, 2H), 3.81 (s, 6H), 2.65 (t, J ) 6.1 Hz,
2H), 2.31 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.6, 158.2,
143.8, 133.4, 131.1, 130.7, 129.7, 119.9, 113.9, 113.4, 71.8, 58.9,
55.44, 55.35, 46.3. MS m/z (relative intensity 70 eV): 327 (M+,
18), 72 (100), 58 (25). Anal. Calcd for C20H25NO3: C, 73.37; H,
7.70. Found: C, 73.3; H, 7.8.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for Non sym m etr ic Dia r yla tion s
(Ta ble 2). The following chemicals were added to a thick-
walled tube: 3 (3.2 µmol, 3.0 mg), LiCl (1.32 mmol, 56.0 mg),
NaOAc (0.880 mmol, 72.2 mg), K2CO3 (0.782 mmol, 108 mg),
aryl bromide (quantity according to entry), olefin 5 (0.65
mmol), DMF (2.0 mL), and water (0.2 mL). The tube was then
closed under air, and the contents were magnetically stirred
and microwave-heated at the temperature and time specified
in Table 2. After cooling, the reaction mixture was diluted with
dietyl ether, and washed twice with 0.1 M NaOH. The
combined aqueous phases were additionally extracted three
times with diethyl ether. The etheral phases were combined
and dried with K2CO3 (s). After evaporation of the solvent,
Early attempts to develop a high-speed microwave
protocol for â,â-diarylation of 1 revealed that water
addition was crucial for catalyst activity.28 It was further
(25) Andersson, C.-M.; Hallberg, A.; Daves, G. D., J r. J . Org. Chem.
1987, 52, 3529-3536.
(28) Rosner, T.; Le Bars, J .; Pfaltz, A.; Blackmond, D. G. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1848-1855.
(29) de Vries, A. H. M.; Mulders, J .; Mommers, J . H. M.; Henderickx,
H. J . W.; de Vries, J . G. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3285-3288.
(30) Consorti, C. S.; Zanini, M. L.; Leal, S.; Ebeling, G.; Dupont, J .
Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 983-986.
(26) For selectivity values with the different catalytic systems, see
the Supporting Information.
(27) Herrmann, W. A.; Brossmer, C.; Reisinger, C. P.; Riermeier,
T. H.; Ofele, K.; Beller, M. Chem.-Eur. J . 1997, 3, 1357-1364.
3348 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 69, No. 10, 2004