Communications
298 K): d = 7.14–8.07 (m, 24H); 6.78–6.93 ppm (m, 3H) (all C6H5 +
C6H4); 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D4Cl2, 298 K): d = 188.4 (d, 1CO, JPC
2.5 Hz), 187.3 (d, 1CO, JPC = 3.2 Hz), 179.9 (s, 1CO), 173.3 (t, 1CO,
PC = 3.9 Hz), 172.4 (d, 1CO, JPC = 12.2 Hz), 161.2 (dd, 1CO, JPC
51.2 Hz, JPC = 5.5 Hz), 158.9–143.6 (54C, C60 sp2 region), 79.1 (d, 1C,
PC = 6.3 Hz, C60 sp3 p-bonded C) 68.0 (t, 1C, JPC = 4.9 Hz, C60 sp3 p-
In the transformation 1!2!3, three PPh3 ligands are
=
converted to the diphosphane m2-Ph2P(o-C6H4)PPh and in
turn to the triphosphane m3-PPh2(o-C6H4)P(o-C6H4)PPh(h1-o-
C6H4) on the Ir4 cluster framework by successive ortho-
phosphanation and ortho-metalation processes, as described
in Scheme 2. Synthesis of phosphane ligands with P-(C)n-P
and P-(C)n-P-(C)n-P donor sequences is of special interest,
because of their ability to bridge metal–metal bonds and thus
to stabilize oligometallic or metal cluster complexes. Such
phosphane ligands have usually been prepared by tedious
multistep organic synthesis.[8] We have now demonstrated that
facile ortho-phosphanation and ortho-metalation can take
place on an Ir4 framework and, more importantly, the
multifunctional C60 ligand can assist the ortho-phosphanation
step, as in the conversion of 2 to 3. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the first example not only of facile ortho-
phosphanation on transition metals but also of the C60
molecule acting as a noninnocent ligand that assists unusual
phosphane-transformation reactions.
J
=
J
bonded C), 64.1 (d, 1C, JPC = 2.4 Hz, C60 sp3 p-bonded C), 62.7 (s, 1C,
C60 sp3 p-bonded C), 61.2 (d, 1C, JPC = 4.5 Hz, C60 sp3 p-bonded C),
60.6 ppm (dd, 1C, JPC = 13.8 Hz, JPC = 2.3 Hz, C60 sp3 p-bonded C);
31P{H} NMR (122 MHz, CS2/ext. CD2Cl2, 298 K): d = 31.2 (d, 1P,
3JPP = 12.8 Hz), ꢀ16.3 (dd, 1P, 3JPP = 12.8 Hz, 3JPP = 4.0 Hz),
ꢀ21.5 ppm (d, 1P, 3JPP = 4.0 Hz); MS (FAB+): m/z: 2210 [M+].
X-ray crystal data for 3: Greenish black crystals were obtained by
slow diffusion of heptane into a solution of 3 in CS2 at room
temperature. The crystal used for data collection contained four
molecules of CS2 (C102H27P3O6Ir4·4CS2, Mr = 2210.09): monoclinic,
space group P21/c, Z = 4, 1calcd = 2.141 gcmꢀ3, a = 17.472(5), b =
3
20.071(6), c = 22.639(6) , b = 100.739(5)8, V= 7800(4) . The struc-
ture was solved by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-
squares analysis to give R = 0.0422 and Rw = 0.0859 (based on F2) for
1144 parameters and 14530 unique reflections with I > 2s(I) and
1.69 < q < 25.528. Data was collected at T= 293(2) K.
We are currently investigating the detailed mechanistic
pathways of 1!2!3 and trying to develop facile synthetic
methods for multifunctional phosphanes from coupling
reactions of phosphanes on Ir4 carbonyl clusters in the
presence of C60 and dihydrogen.
Received: November 10, 2003 [Z53290]
Keywords: cluster compounds · fullerenes · iridium ·
.
phosphanation · Pligands
[1] a) T. L. Makarova, B. Sundqvist, R. Höhne, P. Esquinazi, Y.
Kopelevich, P. Scharff, V. A. Davydov, L. S. Kashevarova, A. V.
Rakhmanina, Nature 2001, 413, 716 – 718; b) H. Imahori, H.
Norieda, H. Yamada, Y. Nishimura, I. Yamazaki, Y. Sakata, S.
Fukuzumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 100 – 110; c) K. Hutch-
ison, J. Schick, Y. Rubin, F. Wudl, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
5611 – 5612.
[2] a) K. Lee, H. Song, J. T. Park, Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 78 – 86,
and references therein; b) G. Lee, Y. J. Cho, B. K. Park, K. Lee,
J. T. Park, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13920 – 13921; c) A. L.
Balch, M. M. Olmstead, Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2123 – 2165; d) A.
Stephens, M. L. H. Green, Adv. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 44, 1 – 43.
[3] a) X. R. Ye, Y. Lin, C. M. Wai, Chem. Commun. 2003, 642 – 643;
b) S. Hermans, J. Sloan, D. S. Shephard, B. F. G. Johnson, M. L. H.
Green, Chem. Commun. 2002, 276 – 277.
Experimental Section
Details on the synthesis as well as a full spectroscopic characterization
of 2 and 3 and the conversion of 2 to 3 are given in the Supporting
Information. X-ray structural data were collected on
a CCD
diffractometer with MoKa radiation (l = 0.71073 ) using w scans.
CCDC-221530 (2) and CCDC-221531 (3) contain the supplementary
crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12, Union Road, Cam-
bridge CB21EZ, UK; fax: (+ 44)1223-336-033; or deposit@ccdc.cam.
ac.uk).
2: Elemental analysis (%) calcd for C50H33Ir4O8P3: C 36.99, H
2.05; found: C 36.76, H 2.19; IR (C6H12): n˜(CO) = 2062 (w), 2049 (s),
2029 (vs), 2011 (vs), 1993 (vs), 1956 (m), 1946 cmꢀ1 (m); 1H NMR
[4] A. J. Drakesmith, R. Whyman, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1973,
362 – 367.
[5] R. M. S. Pereira, F. Y. Fijiwara, M. D. Vargas, D. Braga, F.
Grepioni, Organometallics 1997, 16, 4833 – 4838, and references
therein.
[6] A. J. Deeming, S. E. Kabir, N. L. Powel, P. A. Bates, M. B.
Hursthouse, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1987, 1529 – 1534.
[7] M. I. Bruce, P. A. Humphery, O. B. Shawkataly, M. R. Snow,
E. R. T. Tiekink, W. R. Cullen, Organometallics 1990, 9, 2910 –
2919.
[8] a) C. Bianchini, P. Frediani, V. Sernau, Organometallics 1995, 14,
5458 – 5459; b) S. Hietkamp, H. Sommer, O. Stelzer, Inorg. Synth.
1989, 25, 120 – 122; c) J. G. Hartley, L. M. Venanzi, D. C. Goodall,
J. Chem. Soc. 1963, 3930 – 3936.
(400 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K): d = 8.44 (dd, 1H, JPH = 8.0 Hz, JPH
=
2.5 Hz), 7.89 (m, 1H), 7.63 (m, 4H), 7.46–6.88 (m, 24H), 6.62 (m,
2H), 6.51 ppm (t, 1H, JPH = 7.6 Hz) (all C6H5 + C6H4); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K): d = 186.8 (s, 1CO), 185.7 (s, 1CO), 179.6 (s,
1CO), 176.4 (s, 1CO), 166.4(s, 1CO), 165.7 (s, 1CO), 165.5 (d, 1CO,
2JCP = 3.5 Hz), 163.7 (d, 1CO, 2JCP = 4 Hz), 153.2–124.3 (42C, C6H5 +
C6H4); 31P{H} NMR (122 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K): d = 24.2 (d, 1P, 3JPP
=
22.1 Hz), 16.4 (s, 1P), ꢀ42.9 (d, 1P, 3JPP = 22.1 Hz); MS (FAB+): m/z:
1624 [M+].
X-ray crystal data for 2: Orange crystals were obtained by slow
diffusion of methanol into a solution of 2 in CH2Cl2 at room
temperature. The crystal used for data collection contained no solvent
¯
molecules (C50H33P3O8Ir4, Mr = 1623.47): triclinic, space group P1,
Z = 2, 1calcd = 2.256 gcmꢀ3
,
a = 11.087(1), b = 11.472(1), c =
21.576(2) , a = 91.925(2), b = 101.719(2), g = 116.070(1)8, V=
2390.1(4) 3. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined
by full-matrix least-squares analysis to give R = 0.0576 and Rw =
0.1476 (based on F2) for 586 parameters and 10924 unique reflections
with I > 2s(I) and 1.95 < q < 28.028. Data was collected at T=
293(2) K.
3: Elemental analysis (%) calcd for C102H27Ir4O6P3: C 55.43, H
1.23; found: C 55.64, H 1.42. IR (CH2Cl2): n˜(CO) = 2045 (vs), 2016
(vs), 1998 (s), 1985 (sh), 1970 cmꢀ1 (m); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3,
1714
ꢀ 2004 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1712 –1714