PYRIDINOLYSIS OF DIARYL CARBONATES
this indicates a larger pKa0 value for the aminolysis of the
thiolacetate. The same conclusion arises from a comparison
between the SA aminolysis of 4-nitrophenyl acetate and
4-nitrophenyl thionoacetate.[41] The larger kꢂ1/k2 values for the
acetate indicate that the pKa0 value increases by the change of CS
by CO as the electrophilic group.
The influence of the electrophilic group on the reactivity
toward pyridines can also be evaluated. For pyridines
of pKa > pKa0, for which kN ¼ k1, the k1 values are greater for
carbonates than thionocarbonates (for example for a hypothe-
tical pyridine with pKa ¼ 10 carbonate 3 is 36 times more reactive
than the corresponding thionocarbonate).[30] This shows that CO
is a better electrophile toward pyridines than CS. The same was
found in the pyridinolysis of alkyl aryl thionocarbonates and their
corresponding carbonates: the k1 values are larger for the latter
compounds compared with the former.[29]
and the pH was maintained either by partial protonation of the
pyridines or by means of an external buffer.
Pseudo-first-order rate coefficients (kobs) were found through-
out and determined by means of the spectrophotometer kinetic
software for first-order reactions. The experimental conditions of
the reactions and the values of kobs are shown in Tables 1–7 in
Supplementary Materials.
Product studies
In the reactions of carbonates 1 and 2, 4-nitrophenoxide ion was
found as one of the products of the reactions; in those of
carbonates 3–7, 2,4-dinitrophenoxide anion was obtained as one
of the products. This was achieved by a comparison of the UV–Vis
spectra after completion of the reactions with those of authentic
samples under the same experimental conditions.
In the region of pKa < pKa0 (where Tꢀ breakdown to products is
rate determining), carbonate 3 is slightly more reactive than the
corresponding thionocarbonate.[30] As in this region kN ¼ k1k2/
CONCLUSIONS
k
and k1 is much greater for carbonates (as shown above), it
ꢂ1
From the title reactions the following conclusions can be drawn:
(i) The biphasic Brønsted-type plots (log kN vs. pKa of pyridinium
ions) obtained, the magnitude of the slopes, and the pKa values
found for the center of the break (pKa0) are in accordance with
those for a stepwise mechanism. (ii) An important influence of the
leaving group on the pKa0 value and only a marginal effect of the
non-leaving group were found. (iii) SA amines shift the pKa0 to
higher values, relative to pyridines, due to the faster nucleofug-
ality of an SA amine from the intermediate Tꢀ compared with that
of an isobasic pyridine. (iv) The change of CS by CO as the
electrophilic group also enlarges the pKa0 value.
follows that k2/k should be greater for the thionocarbonate.
ꢂ1
This is in accordance with the larger kꢂ1/k2 values found in the
pyridinolysis of alkyl aryl carbonates relative to those in the same
aminolysis of the corresponding thionocarbonates.[29] These
results are also in agreement with the larger pK0 value (larger k
/
ꢂ1
a
k2 ratio) found for the pyridinolysis of carbonate 3 (this work)
compared with that obtained for the same aminolysis of phenyl
[30]
2,4-dinitrophenyl thionocarbonate.
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials
Acknowledgements
The series of pyridines were purified as reported.[42,43] Carbonates
1,[12] 2,[13] 3,[9] 4,[12] 5,[16] and 7[44] were prepared as described.
Carbonate 6 was prepared as follows: to 2.0 g (10.8 mmol) of
4-nitrophenyl chloroformate in 40 ml of anhydrous acetonitrile, a
mixture of 1 ml of pyridine and 1.685 g (10.8 mmol) of
2,4-dinitrophenol in acetonitrile was added at room temperature
and left 3 h with stirring. The mixture was washed three times
with cold water, dried with magnesium sulfate and the solvent
evaporated off. The solid obtained was recrystallized from a
dichloromethane–hexane mixture yielding a solid that melted at
134–135 8C, and was identified as follows: NMR-1H (400 MHz,
CDCl3) d (ppm): 7.52 (d, 2H, J ¼ 9.2 Hz); 7.70 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.8 Hz); 8.35
We thank MECESUP of Chile (Projects PUC-0004 and RED QUI-
MICA UCH-01), FONDECYT of Chile (Projects 1020538 and
1060593) for financial assistance.
REFERENCES
[1] P. M. Bond, R. B. Moodie, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1976, 679–682.
[2] E. A. Castro, M. Freudenberg, J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 906–910.
[3] E. A. Castro, F. J. Gil, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 7611–7612.
˜
[4] E. A. Castro, F. Ibanez, S. Lagos, M. Schick, J. G. Santos, J. Org. Chem.
1992, 57, 2694–2699.
(d, 2H, J ¼ 9.2 Hz); 8.63 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 2.8 Hz, J ¼ 9.2 Hz); 9.09 (d, 1H,
[5] T. H. Fife, J. E. C. Hutchins, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4194–4199.
[6] H. J. Koh, J. W. Lee, H. W. Lee, I. Lee, Can. J. Chem. 1998, 76, 710–716.
[7] P. Tundo, L. Rossi, A. Loris, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 2219–2224.
[8] E. A. Castro, M. Cubillos, J. G. Santos, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
6000–6003.
13
J ¼ 2.8 Hz). NMR- C (400 MHz, CDCl3) d (ppm): 121.71 (C2 ,C6 );
0
0
0
0
0
122.30 (C3); 125.60 (C3 ,C5 ); 126.19 (C6); 129.75 (C5); 141.10 (C2);
0
—
145.89 (C ); 146.25 (C ); 147.85 (C ); 149.39 (C O); 154.71 (C ).
—
1
4
4
1
Anal. Calcd. for C13H7N3O9: C, 44.71; H, 2.02; N, 12.03. Found: C,
44.71; H, 1.84; N, 11.98.
´
[9] E. A. Castro, M. Aliaga, P. Campodonico, J. G. Santos, J. Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 8911–8916.
[10] M. J. Gresser, W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 6963–6970.
[11] M. J. Gresser, W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 6970–6980.
´
[12] E. A. Castro, M. Andujar, P. Campodonico, J. G. Santos, Int. J. Chem.
Kinet. 2002, 34, 309–315.
[13] E. A. Castro, M. Andujar, A. Toro, J. G. Santos, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
Kinetics measurements
These were carried out by means of a HP-8453 diode array
spectrophotometer in 44 wt% ethanol–water, at 25.0 ꢀ 0.1 8C and
an ionic strength of 0.2 M (KCl). The reactions were studied by
monitoring the appearance of 4-nitrophenoxide anion at 400 nm
or 2,4-dinitrophenoxide anion at 360 nm.
All the reactions were examined under excess of amine over
the substrate. The initial substrate concentration was 5 ꢃ 10ꢂ5 M,
3608–3613.
[14] E. A. Castro, M. Gazitu´a, J. G. Santos, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
8088–8092.
[15] E. A. Castro, P. Campodonico, R. Contreras, P. Fuentealba, J. G. Santos,
´
J. R. Leis, L. Garc´ıa-R´ıo, J. A. Saez, L. Domingo, Tetrahedron 2006, 62,
2555–2562.
[16] E. A. Castro, P. Campodonico, A. Toro, J. G. Santos, J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 5930–5935.
´
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2008, 21 816–822
Copyright ß 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.