COMMUNICATIONS
l-Asparagine was then appended to the seco framework.
Thus, hydrolysis of the a-methyl ester of 21, and conversion of
the derived acid to its N-hydroxysuccinimade ester paved the
way for amide formation with l-Asn hydrate (see compound
22). Exposure of 22 to the action of HCl (4n), followed by
cyclization of the resulting amino acid with pentafluorophenyl
diphenylphosphonate (FDPP) and DIEA in DMF, or with
EDC/HOAT in various solvents (DMF, CH2Cl2, MeCN),
however, did not provide the cyclized product. We reasoned
that the rigidity of the exo double bond at the 3-position of
oxindole ring probably tilts the amino group away from the
asparagine moiety, thereby preventing cyclization. Accord-
ingly, we decided to carry out dihydroxylation prior to
cyclization. Saponification of the methyl ester (E)-21 followed
by coupling with l-asparagine tert-butyl ester (8) as before
provided 23a in 70% yield over two steps. Treatment of 23a
with HF/pyridine afforded free alcohol 23b (Scheme 6).
primary hydroxy group gave similar results (81%, S/R ꢀ 1/1.4,
Scheme 6).
Treatment of (S)-24 with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in
CH2Cl2 resulted in concurrent removal of the Boc protecting
group and hydrolysis of the tert-butyl ester. The crude amino
acid was then submitted to macrolactamization using EDC/
HOATunder highly dilute conditions (4 mm) in CH2Cl2/DMF
(4/1). Cyclization progressed smoothly, providing the desired
product 5[20] in 55% yield over two steps (Scheme 7). The
HO
OH
7
HO
HO
OTIPS
OTIPS
O
8
HN
O
Boc
OtBu
O
HN
N
a, b
N
H
O
H
O
MeO
MeO
O
NH
NH2
N
O
Cbz
H
O
NH2
N
HN
H
Cbz
5 JH7,H8 = 10.4 Hz
(S)-24
Scheme 7. Macrolactamization of (S)-24. a) TFA/CH2Cl2 (4/1), RT, 2 h;
b) EDC, HOAT, DIEA, CH2Cl2/DMF (4/1, 4 mm), RT, 20 h, 55% (two
steps). DIEA N,N-diisopropylethylamine.
H
OTIPS
HN Boc
O
HO
a, b, c
O
N
H
21
large coupling constant (10.4 Hz) observed for H7 ± H8 in 5,
which is similar to those observed in TMC-95A and B (1 and
2),[2] further confirmed the configurational assignments at C6
and C7. Interestingly, treatment of (R)-24 under the same
reaction conditions did not afford any cyclization product.
In summary, the fully functionalized macrocyclic core of
proteasome inhibitors TMC-95A and B (5) has been assem-
bled. There still remain significant issues to be overcome, such
as selectivity enhancement en route to our total synthesis
goal,[21] which are currently being studied in considerable
detail.[22]
O
MeO
Boc
NH
O
NH2
Cbz
N
22
H
OR
N
H
g
d, e
O
OtBu
(E)-21
O
N
H
MeO
O
NH
O
Cbz
NH2
N
H
23a R = TIPS
23b R = H
f
Received: March 14, 2001 [Z16776]
HO
HO
OTIPS
HO
HO
HN
O
6
Boc
OtBu
OTIPS
O
[1] Y. Koguchi, J. Kohno, M. Nishio, K. Takahashi, T. Okuda, T. Ohnuki,
S. Komatsubara, J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 105 ± 109.
[2] J. Kohno, Y. Koguchi, M. Nishio, K. Nakao, M. Kuroda, R. Shimizu, T.
Ohnuki, S. Komatsubara, J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 990 ± 995.
[3] A. Ciechanover, A. L. Schwartz, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95,
2727 ± 2730.
N
H
O
HN
6
O
Boc
+
+
O
MeO
O
N
N
H
H
N
H
NH2
25 (<5%)
O
(R)-24
HN
Cbz
(S)-24
[4] M. Orlowski, C. Michaud, Biochemistry 1989, 28, 9270 ± 9278.
[5] K. Matsuzaki, H. Ikeda, T. Ogino, A. Matsumoto, H. B. Woodruff, H.
Scheme 6. Synthesis of diols 24. a) LiOH, THF/MeOH/H2O; b) hydroxy-
succinimade, DCC, THF, 55% (two steps); c) l-Asn ´ H2O, Et3N, THF/
H2O, RT, 4 h, 70%; d) LiOH, THF/H2O, 0 8C, 1.5 h; e) H-Asn-OtBu (8),
EDC/HOAT, THF, RT, 2 h, 70% (2 steps); f) HF/Py, 84%; g) 1: OsO4/
NMO, (DHQD)2PHAL, tBuOH/H2O, RT, 1 h, 84% (S/R ꢀ 1/1.8); 2: OsO4/
NMO, (DHQ)2PHAL, tBuOH/H2O, RT, 4 h; TIPS-Cl, imidazole/DMAP,
5 h, 81% (S/R ꢀ 1/1.4). DCC 1,3-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide, EDC
1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride, HOAT
1-hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole, Asn asparagine, NMO 4-methylmor-
pholine N-oxide, (DHQD)2PHAL 1,4-bis(9-O-dihydroquinidine)phthal-
azine, (DHQ)2PHAL 1,4-bis(9-O-dihydroquinine)phthalazine.
Ä
Tanaka, S. Omura, J. Antibiot. 1994, 47, 1173 ± 1174.
[6] I. Kaneko, K. Kamoshida, S. Takahashi, J. Antibiot. 1989, 42, 236 ± 241.
[7] N. Lindquist, W. Fenical, G. D. Van Duyne, J. Clardy, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 2303 ± 2304.
[8] a) N. Naruse, O. Tenmyo, S. Kobaru, M. Hatori, K. Tomita, Y.
Hamagishi, T. Oki, J. Careofokumura, J. Antibiot. 1993, 46, 1804 ±
1811; b) N. Naruse, M. Oka, M. Konishi, T. Oki, J. Antibiot. 1993, 46,
1812 ± 1818.
[9] For a review of Suzuki coupling reactions, see: N. Miyaura, A. Suzuki,
Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457 ± 2483.
[10] A. McKillop, R. K. Taylor, R. J. Watson, N. Lewis, Synthesis 1994, 31 ±
33.
[11] A. Wissner, C. V. Grudzinskas, J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 3972 ± 3974.
[12] a) C. S. Marvel, G. S. Hiers, Org. Synth. 1941, Coll. Vol. I, 327 ± 330;
b) M. S. Newman, M. W. Logue, J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 1398 ± 1401;
c) V. Lisowski, M. Robba, S. Rault, J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4193 ±
4194.
Dihydroxylation of 23a using OsO4/NMO in the presence of
(DHQD)2PHAL[18] at room temperature afforded the diols 24
in 84% yield (S/R ꢀ 1/1.8),[19] along with a small amount of
isatin 25 (<5%). Dihydroxylation of 23b in the presence of
(DHQ)2PHAL[18] followed by selective reprotection of the
[13] C. Crestini, R. Saladino, Synth. Commun. 1994, 24, 2835 ± 2841.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, No. 10
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 2001
1433-7851/01/4010-1969 $ 17.50+.50/0
1969