Organic Letters
Letter
As mentioned above, no diprenylated product was detected
in the incubation mixtures of AtaPT with 1−3 and GPP or FPP
(Figure 2 and Scheme 2). This was confirmed by incubation of
their C-monoprenylated derivatives. Product formation was not
observed for the reaction mixtures of 1G1, 2G1, and 3G1 with
AtaPT in the presence of GPP or those of 1F1, 2F1, and 3F1
with FPP (Scheme 3). Incubation of 1D1, 2D1, and 3D1 with
AtaPT and GPP or FPP did not result in product formation. A
previous study showed that AtaPT also catalyzed C-
diprenylations of several aromatic acceptors in the presence
of GPP and FPP, although no gem-prenylated products were
detected.20 No formation of diprenylated 1−3 with these
donors resulted from their orientations in the reaction cavity.
No product formation was detected by LC−MS analysis after
incubation of 1D2 and 2D2 with 50 μg of AtaPT and DMAPP
at 37 °C for 2 h (Scheme 3), excluding the possible formation
of C- and O-diprenylated derivatives from O-monoprenylated
products.
To obtain more insights into the catalytic efficiency of the
tetrameric AtaPT, kinetic parameters including Michaelis−
Menten constants (KM) and turnover numbers (kcat), were
determined at pH 7.5 for 1, 2, and 3 in the presence of
DMAPP, GPP, and FPP as well as DMAPP with 1 and GPP
with 3 (see the SI for details). The catalytic efficiency of AtaPT
toward 1 is 32-fold of that of AnaPT in the presence of
DMAPP. compound 1 was better consumed by AtaPT in the
presence of DMAPP and FPP than 2 and 3. Compound 3 was
most efficiently consumed in the presence of GPP. The
determined kcat/KM values for 1−3 are in the range of 170−300
s−1 M−1 in the presence of GPP and between 17 and 37 s−1
M−1 in the presence of FPP. With 1 as acceptor, a 95-fold kcat/
KM value of that of AnaPT was determined for DMAPP with
donors and Rixa Kraut and Stefan Newel for assistance with the
MS and NMR spectra, respectively. The Bruker microTOF
QIII mass spectrometer was funded by the DFG (INST 160/
620-1 to S.-M. L.). K.Z. is a recipient of a scholarship from the
China Scholarship Council (201308440282).
REFERENCES
■
(1) Ciochina, R.; Grossman, R. B. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3963.
(2) Richard, J. A.; Pouwer, R. H.; Chen, D. Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 4536.
(3) Wu, S.-B.; Long, C.; Kennelly, E. J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31,
1158.
(4) Van Cleemput, M.; Cattoor, K.; De Bosscher, K.; Haegeman, G.;
De Keukeleire, D.; Heyerick, A. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 1220.
(5) Kobayashi, J.; Tanaka, N. Heterocycles 2015, 90, 23.
(6) Garnsey, M. R.; Matous, J. A.; Kwiek, J. J.; Coltart, D. M. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 2406.
(7) Sales, L.; Pezuk, J. A.; Borges, K. S.; Brassesco, M. S.; Scrideli, C.
A.; Tone, L. G.; dos Santos, M. H.; Ionta, M.; de Oliveira, J. C. BMC
Complementary Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 393.
(8) Piccinelli, A. L.; Cuesta-Rubio, O.; Chica, M. B.; Mahmood, N.;
Pagano, B.; Pavone, M.; Barone, V.; Rastrelli, L. Tetrahedron 2005, 61,
8206.
(9) Nagalingam, S. V.; Wai-Ling, K.; Teng-Jin, K. Planta Med. Lett.
2016, 3, e10−e13.
(10) Beerhues, L.; Liu, B. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1719.
(11) Okada, Y.; Ito, K. Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. 2001, 65, 150.
(12) Li, H.; Ban, Z.; Qin, H.; Ma, L.; King, A. J.; Wang, G. Plant
Physiol. 2015, 167, 650.
(13) Tsurumaru, Y.; Sasaki, K.; Miyawaki, T.; Uto, Y.; Momma, T.;
Umemoto, N.; Momose, M.; Yazaki, K. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 2012, 417, 393.
(14) Winkelblech, J.; Fan, A.; Li, S.-M. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
2015, 99, 7379.
(15) Fan, A.; Li, S.-M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 2659.
(16) Liu, C.; Noike, M.; Minami, A.; Oikawa, H.; Dairi, T. Biosci.,
Biotechnol., Biochem. 2014, 78, 448.
(17) Winkelblech, J.; Li, S.-M. ChemBioChem 2014, 15, 1030.
(18) Zhou, K.; Ludwig, L.; Li, S.-M. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 929.
(19) Yin, W.-B.; Grundmann, A.; Cheng, J.; Li, S.-M. J. Biol. Chem.
2009, 284, 100.
(20) Chen, R.; Gao, B.; Liu, X.; Ruan, F.; Zhang, Y.; Lou, J.; Feng, K.;
Wunsch, C.; Li, S.-M.; Dai, J.; Sun, F. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016,
In conclusion, we have provided in this study the first
example of gem-diprenylation of APs by a member of the
DMATS superfamily, proving their unprecedented application
potential. AtaPT could be an interesting candidate for
production of polyprenylated APs like β-bitter acids by
synthetic biology.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
S
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
Experimental procedures, detailed NMR data, HR-ESI-
MS data, determination of kinetic parameters, as well as
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Author
ORCID
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the following people from the University Marburg for
their help: Lena Ludwig and Edyta Stec for synthesis of prenyl
■
D
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX