With these data, the chemistry was scaled to 22-L
equipment. No noteworthy issues were observed. Employing
2 kg of 9, 2.27 kg of 2 was prepared in 72% overall yield
with an assay of 85 wt % and 10 wt % water. Therefore, a
new linear, three-step, methyl isothiocyanate-based synthesis
of 2 from 9 was demonstrated.
water and the pH adjusted to 6 with concentrated HCl. The
zwitterion 2 was collected by centrifugation, the cake was
washed with water and acetonitrile and was then transferred
to a tray dryer and dried at 60 ( 5 °C until the LOD was
measured at less than 1%. This gave rise to 13.0 kg of 2 as
a light-tan powder in 71.5% overall yield from 9 with an
assay of 97.4%.
Pilot-Plant Campaigns
Production Campaign. The major equipment used in the
production of 2 included two 100-gal Pfaudler reactors, four
500-gal Pfaudler reactors, a 40-in. stainless steel-clad Tol-
hurst centrifuge, a vacuum tray dryer, and a 50-gal portable,
glass-lined vacuum tank. Again the chemistry performed as
expected. The one significant operational change imple-
mented was increasing the tray dryer temperature to 70 ( 5
°C. Two batches of 2 were prepared, affording 35.4 kg
(73.1% yield) and 37.0 kg (76.2% yield) of product with
assays of 96.3 and 96.4 wt %, respectively. Thus, the average
yield for all lots was 74.1%, providing a total of 85.6 kg of
2 with an average assay of 96.6 wt %.
The hazardous reagents and potential materials of con-
struction issues associated with the new chemistry led us to
choose a specific third party manufacturer (TPM). This
facility had the high temperature and pressure reactors
necessary to prepare 9, had previous experience in handling
methyl isothiocyanate, and manufactured methyl iodide.
Thus, a strategy was implemented in which a pilot run would
be completed first, and if successful, a production campaign
composed of two batches would be completed.
Preparation of 3-Amino-5-hydroxybenzoic Acid (9).
Laboratory studies directed toward the preparation of 9
followed literature precedent.4 However, upon scale-up,
mixing the ammonium hydroxide, ammonium chloride, and
3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (8) as described gave rise to a
solid, cement-like mass that could not be agitated. We were
able to repeat this phenomenon in the laboratory and found
that the solution to the problem was the order of mixing. It
was discovered that addition of a premixed solution of
ammonium hydroxide and ammonium chloride to 8 avoided
the formation of the solid mass. Once this was ascertained,
51.1 kg of 8 was converted to 25.3 kg of 9 in 51% overall
yield with an assay of >96%. This procedure was success-
fully repeated. The major equipment employed was an
Inconel 600 clad reactor with a working volume of 300 gal
and a maximum pressure tolerance of 1000 psi. The balance
of the work required the use of one 100-gal glass-lined
reactor, two 200-gal glass-lined reactors, a ceramic-coated
filter, and a stainless steel filter.
The Pilot Run. The pilot run was uneventful. The major
equipment utilized were two 30-gal Pfaudler reactors, three
200-gal Pfaudler reactors, a 20-in. stainless steel-clad Tol-
hurst centrifuge, a vacuum tray dryer, and a 50-gal portable,
glass-lined vacuum tank.
A slurry of 9 (11.1 kg, 72.7 mol) in DMF was treated
with a warm solution of methyl isothiocyanate (5.4 kg, 74.1
mol) in DMF. The reaction was allowed to go to completion
by overnight agitation at ambient temperature. In the next
step, crude 10 was treated directly with methyl iodide (14.4
kg, 102 mol) and allowed to agitate overnight at ambient
temperature. Most of the DMF was removed under vacuum,
providing a mobile concentrate.
Conclusions
Studies directed toward the process research and develop-
ment of a scalable method for preparing tetrahydropyrimidine
2, a key intermediate to the Rvâ3 integrin antagonist 1, were
described. A linear approach employing 3-amino-5-hydroxy-
benzoic acid, methyl isothiocyanate, and 1,3-diaminopropan-
2-ol as key reagents was detailed. Development of this
chemistry led to a better understanding of the origin of
impurities and how to diminish them. A successful pilot run
and production campaign were completed in which a total
of 85.6 kg of 2 was prepared with an average assay of 96.6
wt % in an overall yield of 74%.
Experimental Section
General. The actual charges of substrates and reagents
are given below. The molar amounts are calculated on the
basis of the assays of the materials. Similarly, yields are
calculated on the basis of assay-corrected moles of substrates
and products. Proton (1H) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
spectra were recorded on either a Unity Inova Varian 300
MHz or Unity Inova Varian 400 MHz spectrometer. 1H NMR
descriptions are reported as: s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet),
q (quartet), m (multiplet), or br (broad).
Melting points were determined using a Laboratory
Devices Mel-Temp instrument equipped with a Fluke 51
thermocouple. Thin-layer chromatography was performed on
EM Science 0.25 nm silica gel 60, glass-backed plates with
F254 indicator. UV light was employed for visualization.
3-Amino-5-hydroxybenzoic Acid (9).4 To a high-pres-
sure Inconel clad reactor was added 8 (51.1 kg, 332 mol).
In a separate reactor, ammonium chloride (68.0 kg) was
dissolved into ammonium hydroxide (215.5 kg). A clear
solution was obtained. The ammonium hydroxide/ammonium
chloride solution was then drawn into the reactor containing
8. The loading sequence is important because altering the
procedure could create a mass that cannot be stirred. The
contents of the reactor were agitated, heated to 180-190
°C, and held within this temperature range for 40-42 h.
In the final step, a warm solution of 1,3-diaminopropan-
2-ol (19.7 kg, 218 mol) and DMF was added to the
concentrate of 11. This mixture was gradually heated,
resulting in off-gassing of methyl mercaptan and methy-
lamine. The gases were scrubbed with solutions of caustic
and sulfuric acid. The reaction solution was then diluted with
(5) No impurity derived from the expulsion of methyl mercaptan was observed.
(6) Intermediate 2 was a proposed registered starting material.
(7) The effect of the water associated with 2 on the downstream chemistry to
prepare 1 will be a subject of discussion in part three of this series.
574
•
Vol. 8, No. 4, 2004 / Organic Process Research & Development