D. Pan et al. / Carbohydrate Polymers 117 (2015) 106–114
109
Table 1
Monosaccharide and amino acid components in FYGL-n .
Components
Monosaccharid
content (%)
Components
Amino acid
contents (%)
Components
Amino acid
contents (%)
Components
Amino acid
contents (%)
Glucose
47.0
8.0
24.0
21.0
Asp
Thr
Ser
Glu
Phe
Pro
14.40
8.98
10.20
9.04
3.58
5.84
Gly
Ala
Val
Ile
Leu
Tyr
12.80
9.88
7.81
5.00
7.54
0.43
Arg
Lys
His
Cys
Met
1.20
1.54
1.21
0.39
0.15
Arabinose
Rhamnose
Galactose
Asp, aspartic acid; Asn, asparagine; Gly, glycine; Glu, glutamic acid; Gln, glutamine; Ala, alanine; Ser, serine; Thr, threonine; Leu, lecine; Phe, phenylalanine; Val, valine; Pro,
proline; Ile, isoleucine;Tyr, tyrosine; Arg, arginine; Lys,lsine; His, histidine; Cys, cysteine; Met, methionine.
approximate 82 2% polysaccharide and 12 2% protein. More-
over, no uronic acid was detected in FYGL-n. Therefore, it was
suggested that FYGL-n was a proteoglycan, i.e. the proteins in
FYGL-n were covalently bound to the polysaccharide since the free
proteins were removed by the Sevage method.
(2.34%), 3,4-Me2-Rhap (4.96%), 2,3,4-Me3-Glcp (28.8%). Thus, the
degree of branching (DB) could be calculated on the following equa-
tion:
NT + NB
DB =
(4)
NT + NB + NL
For the monosaccharide analysis, FYGL-n was hydrolyzed,
are detected at 6.26, 7.25, 8.01 and 8.11 min in GC spectrum (Data
in Supporting information Fig. S1). By comparison with monosac-
charide references, it is concluded that FYGL-n is composed of
arabinose, galactose, rhamnose and glucose, with a ratio of 0.08:
0.21: 0.24: 0.47 (Table 1). For absolute configuration analysis,
FYGL-n was hydrolyzed and derivatizated into TMS-derivatives,
using -(+)-2-butanol and N,O-bis(tri-methylsilyl) trifluroacetamide
(BSTFA). By comparison with those TMS-derivatives of standard
monosaccharides, it can be concluded that the configurations of all
glycosyl residues in FYGL-n are in d-enantiomers except rhamnose
in l-enantiomer. The analysis of amino acids in FYGL-n indi-
cated that there were 16 natural amino acids including aspartic
acid/asparagine (Asx, 14.40%), glycine (Gly, 12.80%), serine (Ser,
10.20%), alanine (Ala, 9.88%), glutamic acid/glutamine (Glx, 9.04%),
threonine (Thr, 8.98%), valine (Val, 7.81%), leucine (Leu, 7.54%), pro-
sine (Tyr, 0.43%), cysteine (Cys, 0.39%) and methionine (Met, 0.15%).
The high contents of serine (10.2%) and threonine (8.98%) implied
the possible existence of O-glycosidic linkage between polysaccha-
ride and protein in FYGL-n (Chen, Xie, Nie, Li, & Wang, 2008).
where NT, NB, and NL are the total contents of the terminal residues
(15.6%), branched residues (45.3%), and backbone residues (39.1%),
respectively. The DB value of FYGL-n was thus calculated to be 0.61,
implying a highly branched biomacromolecule (Aulenta & Hayes,
2003).
Periodate oxidation and Smith degradation of FYGL-n were
performed to confirm the glycosidic linkages deduced from
the methylation analysis. The residue products from periodate
oxidation and Smith degradation of FYGL-n contained glycerol,
rhamnose, erythrose, glucose and galactose in the GC spectrum
such as 1→, 1 → 2, 1 → 6 or 1 → 2,6, which could be attributed
to the residues of 2,3,4,6-Me4-Glcp, 2,3,4-Me3-Galp, 2,3,4,6-Me4-
Galp, 3,4-Me2-Rhap, and 2,3,5-Me3-Araf, as characterized by
methylation analysis (Liu & Sun, 2011). Similarly, the production
of erythrose indicated that there might exist glycosyl linkage
of 1 → 4 or 1 → 4,6 which could be assigned to 2,3,6-Me3-Glcp
linked in the form of 1 → 3, 1 → 2,3, 1 → 2,4, 1 → 3,4, 1 → 3,6 or
1 → 2,3,4, which might be attributed to 2,4,6-Me3-Glcp, 3,6-Me2-
Galp, 2,4-Me2-Galp or 6-Me-Glcp, respectively (Chandra, Ghosh,
Linkage bonds between polysaccharide moiety and protein one
in the proteoglycan can be classified into two types on the basis
of their stability against alkali, one is O-glycosidic linkage, and
the other is N-glycosidic linkage (Tao, Zhang, & Zhang, 2009). The
alkali-sensitive O-glycosidic linkages (involving serine and threon-
ine residues) can be easily broken in relatively mild condition by
-elimination reaction resulting in the release of the carbohydrate
moiety, and the serine and threonine residues linked to hydroxyl of
3.2. Linkage features of FYGL-n
As demonstrated by methylation analysis, there were at least
eleven types of linkages present in FYGL-n (Table 2 and sup-
porting information Fig. S2). Specifically, the analytical results
revealed that FYGL-n contained terminal residues of 2,3,4,6-Me4-
Glcp (8.18%), 2,3,4,6-Me4-Galp (4.49%), 2,3,5-Me3-Araf (2.93%),
branched residues of 2,4-Me2-Galp (11.15%), 3,6-Me2-Glalp
(9.38%), 6-Me-Glcp (19.1%), 3-Me-Rhap (5.69%), and remaining
backbone residues of 2,3,6-Me3-Glcp (2.97%), 2,3,4-Me3-Galp
Table 2
GC–MS analysis of methylated FYGL-n.
Peak no. in GC
MS fragments (m/z)
Methylated monosaccharide
Glycosidic linkage
Mole ratio (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
43,87,101,117,129,161
2,3,6-Me3-Glcp
2,3,4-Me3-Galp
2,3,4,6-Me4-Glcp
2,3,4,6-Me4-Galp
3,4-Me2-Rhap
2,4-Me2-Galp
3,6-Me2-Galp
2,3,5-Me3-Araf
6-Me-Glcp
→4)-Glcp-(1→
→6)-Galp-(1→
Glcp-1→
2.97
2.34
8.18
4.49
4.96
11.15
9.38
2.93
19.1
5.69
28.8
43,58,71,87,101,117,129,161,189,233
43,101,71,75,88,99,143,175,102,222,115
43,59,71,87,101,117,129,145,161,205
43,131,129,89,87,117,189,99,113
43,117,129,189,87,159,233
Galp-1→
→2)-Rhap-(1→
→3,6)-Galp-(1→
→2,4)-Galp-(1→
Araf-(1→
43,117,190,233
117,129,101,45,161,87,71,145
43,73,85,103,115,127,145,175,187,217
43,129,143,87,117,189,101,203
58,97,87,129,143,59,71,75,85,171,103,111,145,203
9
10
11
→2,3,4)-Glcp-(1→
→2,4)-Rhap-(1→
→6)-Glcp-(1
3-Me-Rhap
2,3,4-Me3-Glcp