1994
B. Baruah et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 12 (2004) 1991–1994
Table 2. Result of HT-29 xenograft studies
Compound
MTD, PO in
athemic nude mice
Schedule
Dose
(mg/kg/day)
Total dose
(mg/kg)
Max. mean%
weight loss (day)
% T=C (day)
1
>1000
>1000
100
QD · 20
QD · 20
QD · 20
QD · 20
300
100
25
6000
2000
500
6 (20)
10 (20)
3 (20)
12 (20)
132 (20)10
94 (20)11
94 (20)12
75 (20)13
6
7
11
600
100
2000
P.; Misra, P.; Mullangi, R.; Casturi, S. R.; Yeleswarapu,
K. R. Ind. J. Chem. 2003, 42B, 593.
Compound showing an optimum T=C% value of <43%
was considered as active in this xenograft model.
Though compounds 6, 7, and 11 showed very good in
vitro activity, the activity did not translate in the xeno-
graft model, probably because of their poor bioavail-
ability.
5. Abramovitch, R. A.; Shapiro, D. J. Chem. Soc. 1954,
4263; Abramovitch, R. A.; Shapiro, D. J. Chem. Soc.
1956, 4589; Phillips, R. R.. In: Organic Reactions; John
Wiley & Sons: New York, 1959; Vol. X, Chapter 2, p 143.
6. Rahman, A. V.; Ghazala, M. Synthesis 1980, 372–374.
7. Bergman, J.; Bergman, S. Heterocycles 1986, 16, 347.
8. Bergman, J.; Bergman, S. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1246.
9. In vitro cell growth assay: Cells were seeded on a 96-well
cell culture plates at a concentration of 10,000 cells/well in
a volume of 100 lL of RPMI medium with 10% fetal
bovine serum and were incubated at 37 ꢁC in a CO2
incubator. After 24 h cells were treated with varied
concentrations of compounds in 100 lL of medium and
the control wells received vehicle. The plates were further
incubated at 37 ꢁC in a CO2 incubator for 48 h. The assay
was terminated by addition of 50% cold TCA to a final
concentration of 10% to the cells, followed by incubation
at 4 ꢁC for 1 h. At the time of compound addition, a
separate set of cells having a 24 h growth were terminated
for time zero growth (T0). The TCA fixed plates were
washed thrice with distilled water, air dried, and stained
with 0.4% SRB in 1% acetic acid for 30 min at room
temperature. The plates were washed with 1% acetic acid,
dried, and the protein bound dye was dissolved in 100 lL
of 10 mM Tris buffer and read at 515 nm. The percentage
growth of treated cells is calculated using the following
formulae: if T is greater than or equal to T0, percentage
growth ¼ 100½ðT ꢂ T0Þ= ðC ꢂ T0Þꢃ and if T is less than T0,
percentage growth ¼ 100½ðT ꢂ T0Þ=T0ꢃ, where C, T and T0
are optical densities of control, test, and time zero,
respectively. From the growth curves, the GI50 values
were extrapolated.
In conclusion, in this communication, we have described
the synthesis, in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity of a
new series of quinazolino-b-carbolinone derivatives.
Many compounds have shown good in vitro activity, in
the range 1–8 lM concentration. Further work to
impart the desired in vivo activity among these novel
compounds is presently under progress.
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. R. Rajagopalan and A. Venkateswarlu
for discussions and analytical department for providing
the spectral data.
References and notes
1. Li, S. C. In Pentssu Kang Mu, 1976; Chapter 32, p 1064;
Lia, J. F.; Chen, C. F.; Chow, S. Y. J. Formosan Med.
Assoc. 1981, 79, 0–38; Chow, S. Y.; Chen, S. M.; Yang,
C. M. J. Formosan Med. Assoc. 1976, 75, 349–357; Anon.
In Encyclopedia of Chinese Medicine; People’s: Shangai,
People’s Republic of China, 1977; p 1118.
2. Asahina, Y.; Ishimasa, S. Synthese des Rutaecarpins.
Yakugaku Zasshi 1926, 534, 61–63; Bergman, J. In The
Alkaloids; Brossi, A. R., Ed.; Academic: New York, 1983;
Vol. 21, pp 29–54.
10. Compound 1: mp 160–161 ꢁC; (lit.7 159 ꢁC) IR: (KBr)
3325, 1655 cmꢂ1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3) d 3.23 (2H, t,
J ¼ 7 Hz), 4.60 (2H, t, J ¼ 7 Hz), 7.30–7.80 (8H, m) and
8.30 (1H, s); CIMS m=z 288 (MHþ, 100%).
3. Yang, L. M.; Lin, S. J.; Lin, L. C.; Kuo, Y. H. The Chin.
Pharm. J. 199, 51, 219–225; Yang, L. M.; Chen, C. F.; Lee,
K. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1995, 5, 465–468.
11. Compound 6: mp 308–309 ꢁC; IR: (KBr) 3335, 1653 cmꢂ1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3) d 3.23 (2H, t, J ¼ 6:9 Hz), 4.60 (2H, t,
J ¼ 7 Hz), 7.20–7.80 (7H, m) and 8.30 (1H, s); CIMS m=z
322 (MHþ, 100%).
4. Pal, M.; Madan, M.; Padakanti, S.; Pattabiraman, V. R.;
Kalleda, S.; Vanguri, A.; Mullangi, R.; Casturi, S. R.;
Yeleswarapu, K. R. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3975; Pal,
M.; Veeramaneni, V. R.; Nagabelli, M.; Misra, P.;
Casturi, S. R.; Yeleswarapu, K. R. Biorg. Med. Chem.
Letts. 2003, 13, 1639; Barua, B.; Dasu, K.; Vaitalingam,
B.; Misra, P.; Casturi, S. R.; Yeleswarapu, K. R. Biorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 445; Pal, M.; Veeramaneni, V.
R.; Padakanti, S.; Nagabelli, M.; Vanguri, A.; Mamnoor,
12. Compound 7: mp 300–301 ꢁC; IR: (KBr) 3332, 1652 cmꢂ1
;
1H NMR (CDCl3) d 2.99 (3H, s), 3.23 (2H, t, J ¼ 7 Hz),
4.65 (2H, t, J ¼ 7 Hz), 7.40–7.84 (7H, m) and 8.40 (1H, s);
CIMS m=z 338 (MHþ, 100%).
13. Compound 11: mp 294–295 ꢁC; IR: (KBr) 3325,
1655 cmꢂ1; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) d 3.13 (2H, t, J ¼ 7 Hz),
4.70 (2H, t, J ¼ 7 Hz), 7.30–8.50 (8H, m) and 8.90 (1H, s);
CIMS m=z 333 (MHþ, 100%).