with a zinc cation to form a 2:1 complex ZnL2. Single crystal
diffraction confirmed that the zinc cation recognizes the hard
tridentate site in ligand L2 and that it coordinates in a distorted
octahedral fashion to the deprotonated hydroxyquinoline of two
ligands.12 Solution studies agree with this formulation. Upon
complexation in a 2:1 ligand–metal mode, the signals of protons a
and b are both shifted to lower values by approximately 1.2 ppm, as
a result of both cation complexation and shielding by the phenyl
ring.
controlled introduction of two pairs of cations along the diagonals
imposes a directionality to these systems, which may thereafter be
translated at a supramolecular level in the 1D and 2D organization
of grids into arrays.13 In addition, preliminary mass spectrometry
data show that zinc(II) can be replaced by copper(II) while
preserving the tetrameric assembly. Hence, a single cation in two
different (and possibly interconvertible) oxidation states may be
used to assemble these architectures, which may open the door to
electro-controlled self-assembled grids.
In the case of the 1:0.5:0.5 ligand–zinc–copper mixture, the
resulting deep purple complex displays a further decrease in shift of
~ 0.4 ppm for b and ~ 0.9 ppm for a, relative to ZnL2 (1.6 and 2.2
ppm respectively relative to the free anionic ligand), suggesting that
stacking is enhanced upon copper complexation.
The present results achieve the single step, programmed self-
assembly of heteronuclear arrays of metal ions of well-defined
geometry with ion selectivity and toposelectivity, a given metal ion
being selected for binding at a precisely determined location. These
features bear relation to the potential interest of such arrays for local
information storage and addressing as well as to processes of self-
organization by selection.9
The values of the chemical shifts closely resemble those obtained
with pyrimidine bridged [2 3 2] grids based on octahedral
centers,7e for which, however, the signals of both protons a and b
are split, due to hindered rotation of the phenyl group within the
grid architecture, which renders them inequivalent. In the present
case, the two ortho a and meta b protons are equivalent on the NMR
time scale. The signal for the b protons is actually broadened [Fig.
1(c)], indicative of intermediate rotation rate around the phenyl–
pyrimidine bond. The mass spectral data agree with a 4:2:2 ligand–
zinc–copper composition (peaks at 1018.2 and 2187 respectively
for the 2+ species and the 1+ species with a triflate anion).
The grid type structure of the [Zn2Cu2L4]2+ complex was
confirmed by single crystal diffraction (Fig. 2).‡ In contrast to the
fully octahedral site homonuclear grids,7d,e this mixed tetrahedral/
octahedral center [2 3 2] grid deviates from a strictly square
geometry; it is diamond shaped with an angle of about 100°
between the planes of the ligand at each octahedral Zn(II) site. The
Cu–Zn distances (edges) range from 6.5 to 6.7 Å. These features
correlate with a large difference in the length of the two diagonals,
the Zn–Zn distance being much shorter (8.5 Å) than the Cu–Cu
distance (10 Å). The phenyl groups are held within stacking
between two parallel ligands, as in homonuclear octahedrally based
[2 3 2] grids.7e Their orientation relative to the pyrimidine differs
though, since the torsion angle is only 50° compared to the usual
90°. Two enantiomeric grids are present in the unit cell.
Notes and references
‡ Crystal data for [Zn2Cu2L4]2+: C232H200Cu4N32O8Zn4·3BF4·F3CSO-
3·5CH3OH·2H2O, M = 4685.76, purple prism, triclinic, a = 17.8009(3), b
= 18.2756(3), c = 21.3141(4) Å, V = 5887.1(2) Å3, a = 17.80009(3), b
= 66.993(5), g = 67.425(5)°, space group P1, Z = 1, m = 0.842 mm21
,
¯
35 951 data measurements, 11 153 data measurements with I > 3s(I), R =
0.105, Rw = 0.137. Anions (BF4 and triflate) are disordered in the crystal.
in CIF or other electronic format.
1 (a) J.-M. Lehn, Supramolecular Chemistry – Concepts and Per-
spectives, VCH, Weinheim, 1995, ch. 9; (b) D. Philp and J. F. Stoddart,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 1154.
2 D. C. Sherrington and K. A. Taskinen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2001, 30, 83;
M. J. Krische and J.-M. Lehn, Struct. Bonding, 2000, 96, 3.
3 J.-M. Lehn, Chem. Eur. J., 2000, 6, 2097.
4 C. Piguet, G. Bernardinelli and G. Hopfgartner, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97,
2005.
5 G. Hanan, C. Arana, J.-M. Lehn, G. Baum and D. Fenske, Chem. Eur.
J., 1996, 2, 1292.
6 (a) P. N. W. Baxter, in Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, Vol.
9, ed. J. L. Atwood, J. E. D. Davies, D. D. MacNicol, F. Vögtle, J.-M.
Lehn, Pergamon, Oxford, 1996, p. 165; (b) M. Fujita, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
1998, 27, 417.
The complex cation [Zn2Cu2L4]2+ is the first [2 3 2] grid self-
assembled from two cations of different coordination geometries.
The generation of a well-defined species results from the proper
reading of the electronic information (namely the coordination
number and the hard/soft nature) of the binding sites by the cation
effectors. The high coordination number hard zinc(II) cation
recognizes the anionic tridentate unit while soft tetracoordinate
7 (a) M.-T. Youinou, N. Rahmouni, J. Fischer and J. A. Osborn, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1992, 31, 733; (b) P. N. W. Baxter, J.-M. Lehn,
J. Fischer and M.-T. Youinou, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33,
2284; (c) G. Hanan, D. Volkmer, U. S. Schubert, J.-M. Lehn, G. Baum
and D. Fenske, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 1842; (d) J.
Rojo, F. J. Romero-Salguero, J.-M. Lehn, G. Baum and D. Fenske, Eur.
J. Inorg. Chem., 1999, 1421; (e) M. Ruben, E. Breuning, M. Barboiu, J.-
P. Gisselbrecht and J.-M. Lehn, Chem. Eur. J., 2003, 9, 291; (f) M.
Ruben, E. Breuning, J.-M. Lehn, V. Ksenofontov, F. Renz, P. Guetlich
and G. B. M. Vaughan, Chem. Eur. J., 2003, 9, 4422.
copper( ) prefers to bind to the bipyridine type portion. The
I
8 (a) D. M. Bassani, J.-M. Lehn, K. Fromm and D. Fenske, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 2364; (b) L. Uppadine and J.-M. Lehn, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 240.
9 J.-M. Lehn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2002, 99, 4763.
10 J. R. Nitschke and J.-M. Lehn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2003, 100,
11 970.
11 V. Smith and J.-M. Lehn, Chem. Commun., 1996, 2733; J.-C. G. Bünzli
and C. Piguet, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 1897.
12 The synthesis and properties of ligand LH and of its complexes will be
described in detail in a forthcoming paper: A. Petitjean, N. Kyritsakas
and J.-M. Lehn, manuscript in preparation. All compounds had
properties in agreement with their structure.
13 For grid arrays organized in two dimensions by hydrogen bonding
recognition groups see: E. Breuning, U. Ziener, J.-M. Lehn, E. Wegelius
and K. Rissanen, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2001, 1515.
Fig. 2 Molecular structure of [Zn2Cu2L4]2+: (a) side view; (b) top view. The
n-butyl chains are represented in light grey; solvent molecules and triflate
anions are omitted for clarity. Stick and ball representation were used for the
ligands and cations respectively.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 1 6 8 – 1 1 6 9
1169