´
K. M. Button, R. A. Gossage, H. A. Jenkins, T. Mahdi, and S. Resanovic
270
Vol 47
0.9479, 0.9265, refinement method: full-matrix least-squares
on F2, data/restraints/parameters: 3893/0/202, GOF on F2:
1.042, final R indices [I > 2r(I)] R1 ¼ 0.0446, wR2 ¼
0.1126, R indices (all data): R1 ¼ 0.0544, wR2 ¼ 0.1193,
absolute structure parameter: 0.7 (10), largest diff. peak and
conditions. We have been unable to recrystallize 2 from
hydrocarbon media to a point in which the measured mp
mimics that disclosed by Padmaja et al. (126ꢀC: to our
knowledge the highest mp reported for 2) [26]. Their
method used glacial acetic acid for recrystallization.
Using this solvent gave white material of mp 113–
114ꢀC. It should also be noted that the analytical purity
of 2, as described in [22], could contain traces of 3. For
example, the contamination of a sample of 2 by 1% by
weight of 3 (corresponding to 9.3 molecules of 3 per
100 that of 2) gives a calculated elemental analysis
(calc.: C 74.16; H 4.79; N 13.38%) consistent with 2
(vide supra) and this concentration of impurity makes it
unlikely that 3 would be easily spotted by NMR spec-
troscopy. Despite these facts, it does appear as if all
these levels of purity of 2 are still of sufficient quality
for the use of this material in subsequent syntheses
[23,31,32].
hole: 0.241–0.272 eAꢄ3. The molecular representation found
˚
in Figure 1 was drawn using ORTEP-III for Windows [34]. CCDC
#747662 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for
this article. These data can be obtained free of charge from
The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.
cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
CONCLUSIONS
This investigation has demonstrated that compound 2
(i.e., 2-[1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl]aniline) can be problematic
to isolate in very pure form under the reaction condi-
tions described independently by us and Gajare et al.
Contamination of 2 by its ring opened precursor (20-
hydroxy-2-aminobenzanilide: 3) can lead to the isolation
of analytically ‘‘pure’’ material in an oil-like form. Cau-
tion is likewise advised as to the measurement of the
purity of solid 2 by mp determination although lower
melting point material appears to be of sufficient purity
for later synthetic applications. Material with the most
pronounced mp behavior is that which has been recrys-
tallized from glacial acetic acid as described previously
[26]. The contaminant of 2, viz. 3, has been fully char-
acterized (mp, NMR, X-ray diffraction).
EXPERIMENTAL
Isolation of 2-(1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl)aniline (2) and 20-
hydroxy-2-aminobenzanilide (3). The synthesis of com-
pounds 2 and 3 was carried out as described in reference [23].
Purification of the reaction mixture via flash chromatography
(1/1 v/v hexanes/EtOAc) using ꢂ50 g of silica on a column of
2 cm diameter yielded ꢂ40 fractions (ꢂ15 mL each in test
tubes). These extractions were left to evaporate in open air
(fumehood) of which the first 15 contained solid pure (NMR)
2 (yield 36% [23]); fractions 16–18, which were slightly pink
in color, yielded about 50 mg of 3 (0.4%) and a small amount
of 2. Compounds 2 and 3 were then separated manually from
these fractions. The latter fractions contained species which
could not be unequivocally identified (NMR). Properties of 2:
mp 113–114ꢀC (AcOH; lit.: see text); pmr (d, 400 MHz, deu-
terochloroform): data was consistent to within experimental
error to that reported (lit. [28]). Properties of 3: mp: 136–
136.5ꢀC (1/1 v/v hexanes/EtOAc; lit. [30] 139–140ꢀC); pmr
(d, 600 MHz, deuterochloroform containing ꢂ10% hexadeu-
tero-dmso), 9.11 (s, br, 1H, NH), 8.75 (s, br, 1H, OH), 7.71
(dd, 1H, J ¼ 1.7, 7.8, ArH), 7.34 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 1.5, 7.9, ArH),
7.00 (td, 1H, J ¼ 1.2, 7.2, ArH), 6.75 (m, 1H, ArH), 6.72 (dd,
1H, J ¼ 1.8, 7.8, ArH), 6.63 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.52 (dd, 1H, J ¼
1.2, 7.8, ArH), 6.46 (td, 1H, J ¼ 1.2, 7.2, ArH), 2.60 (s, v. br,
NH2); cmr (d, 150 MHz, deuterochloroform containing ꢂ10%
hexadeutero-dmso), 167.5 (C¼¼O), 148.7, 147.1, 132.1, 127.6,
126.3, 124.4, 121.0, 119.3, 117.0, 116.0, 115.9, 115.5.
Acknowledgments. This work has been funded by a gener-
ous donation from Research Corporation. The authors are
also indebted to the support of both Acadia and Ryerson
Universities and NSERC (Canada) in the form of a Discov-
ery Grant (RAG) and via an NSERC USRATM. Prof. K. J.
Haller (Suranaree University of Technology) is also
thanked for his preliminary examination of compound 3.
Mr. Shawn McFadden (RUAC) and Dr. D. W. Hughes
(MAX Facility) are also thanked for their contributions to
this research.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
[1] 2-[ortho-Anilinyl]-1,3-benzoxazole is also referred to as 2-
(1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl)aniline.
[2] Oxazoles XXIV. Part XXIII. See Deshpande et al. [13].
[3] Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem Rev 2006,
106, 3561.
Crystal data for 3. The structure of complex 3 was solved
using previously described methods [33]. Formula
C13H12N2O2, MW: 229.24, orthorhombic, space group
[4] Hargaden, G. C.; Guiry, P. J. Chem Rev 2009, 109, 2505.
[5] Meyers, A. I. J Org Chem 2005, 70, 6137.
[6] Pfaltz, A. Acta Chem Scand 1996, 50, 189.
[7] Rasappan, R.; Laventine, D.; Reiser, O. Coord Chem Rev
2008, 252, 702.
˚
˚
P212121, a ¼ 6.715 (2) A, b ¼ 12.100 (4) A, c ¼ 13.320 (4)
3
3
ꢀ
˚
˚
A, a ¼ b ¼ c ¼ 90 , V ¼ 1082.2 (6) A , Dc ¼ 1.401 g/cm ,
Z ¼ 4. Crystal size: 0.80 ꢃ 0.71 ꢃ 0.56 mm3, light pink. Tem-
˚
perature ¼ 173 (2) K, k(MoKa) ¼ 0.71073 A, Absolute coeffi-
[8] Gade, L. H.; Bellemin-Laponnaz, S. Coord Chem Rev
2007, 251, 718.
cient ¼ 0.097 mmꢄ1, F(000) ¼ 480, y range for data collec-
tion: 2.27–32.46ꢀ, hkl range: –4 to 10, –17 to 18, –20 to 18.
Reflexions collected: 16,294, Independent reflexions: 3893
[R(int) ¼ 0.0581], Completeness to y ¼ 32.46ꢀ: 99.9%,
Absorption corr.: numerical, max. and min. transmission:
´
[9] Fraile, J. M.; Garcıa, J. I.; Mayoral, J. A. Coord Chem Rev
2008, 252, 624.
´
[10] Lorcy, D.; Bellec, N.; Fourmigue, M.; Avarvari, N. Coord
Chem Rev 2009, 253, 1398.
Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
DOI 10.1002/jhet