death control relies on the basic role of the proteasome in
most cellular processes that are mediated by small peptide
molecules produced by the proteasome.3 Therefore, further
studies of these substances exhibiting such remarkable
biological activities4 can ultimately lead to the development
of new treatment options against cancer and inflammatory
diseases.
propyl)alanine 5, which has recently attracted considerable
attention.6 An additional challenge was to develop an
approach that will tolerate a variety of substituents in the
amino- and carboxyl-terminal amino acid moieties of the
dipeptide 3, thus implying that the final acetylation of the
side chain amino group of 3 and subsequent â-lactone ring
construction should be performed under very mild conditions.
First, the dipeptide components 3a and 3b were synthe-
sized in four steps (Scheme 2). Benzylation of the com-
In an effort to establish a flexible access to the belactosins
and their derivatives, we embarked on a modular approach,
starting from four distinct building blocks (Scheme 1). Their
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the Dipeptides 3a and 3ba
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of Belactosin A
a Conditions: (a) CbzCl, DMAP, DIEA, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 6 h; (b)
Et2NH, THF, rt, 3 h; (c) Cbz-Ala-OH, EDC, HOAt, TMP, CH2Cl2,
0 °C to rt, 16 h; (d) 3 M HCl in EtOAc, iPr3SiH, rt, 17 h.
mercial diprotected ornithine and lysine derivatives 7 with
Cbz-Cl/DIEA/DMAP furnished the esters 8, which after
removal of the Fmoc group, were coupled with Cbz-Ala-
OH. The Boc groups were cleaved off the resulting fully
protected dipeptides 9 by treatment with 3 M hydrochloric
acid to afford the hydrochlorides 3a and 3b in yields of 91
and 94%, respectively, over four steps.
variation can give rise to a large set of analogues, and their
efficient synthesis can provide a solid basis for further studies
of their biological activities.
The attempted preparation of the diprotected trans-(2-
aminocyclopropyl)alanine derivative 7c as a prerequisite for
the synthesis of belactosin A (1) by the recently published
two-step general procedure,7 which proved to be feasible for
large-scale preparations of the analogous lysine and ornithine
derivatives 7a and 7b, gave only a very low yield (27%) of
7c (Scheme 2). This must be attributed to the experimental
difficulties inevitably encountered on applying that procedure
to subgram quantities of the enantiomerically pure trans-(2-
aminocyclopropyl)alanine (5). To get around these difficul-
ties, advantage was taken of the intrinsic differentiation of
the two nitrogen atoms in trans-(2-nitrocyclopropyl)alanine
(10), an established precursor to 5.6b Therefore, compound
10 was converted into the respective Boc derivative 11 (84%
yield). The nitro group in 11 was then reduced to an amino
group. At first, this also presented a problem, since hydro-
genation of 11 over Pd/C in methanol was shown to give
rise to an extensive reductive cyclopropane ring cleavage.8
The belactosin compounds comprise an interesting trans-
disubstituted â-lactone5 with an adjacent stereogenic center
in the side chain, thus calling for a special anti-selective
aldol-addition strategy. Additionally, belactosin A contains
the new cyclopropane amino acid trans-(2-aminocyclo-
(2) Asai, A.; Tsujita, T.; Sharma, S. V.; Yamashita, Y.; Akinaga, S.;
Funakoshi, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Mizukami, T., Asahi-machi, M.-s. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 2004, 67, 227-234.
(3) (a) Gillessen, S.; Groettrup, M.; Cerny, T. Onkologie 2002, 25, 534-
539. (b) Almond, J. B.; Cohen, G. M. Leukemia 2002, 16, 433-443. (c)
Elliott, P. J.; Zollner, T. M.; Boehncke, W.-H. J. Mol. Med. 2003, 81, 235-
245. (d) A few weeks after submission of this manuscript, a very recent
publication on the total synthesis of belactosin A came to our attention:
Armstrong, A.; Scutt, J. N. Chem. Commun. 2004, 510-511.
(4) For some recent advances in isolation and syntheses of â-lactone
proteasome inhibitors, see: (a) Corey, E. J.; Li, W. D. Z. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1999, 47, 1-10. (b) Masse, C. E.; Morgan, A. J.; Adams, J.; Panek
J. S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 14, 2513-2528. (c) Crane, S. N.; Corey, E.
J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1395-1397. (d) Feling, R. H.; Buchanan, G. O.;
Mincer, T. J.; Kauffman, C. A.; Jensen P. R.; Fenical, W. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 355-357. (e) Saravanan, P.; Corey, E. J. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 2760-2764. (f) Brennan, C. J.; Pattenden, G.; Rescourio, G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 8757-8760. (g) Berthelot, A.; Piguel, S.; Le
Dour, G.; Vidal, J. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9835-9838.
(6) (a) Armstrong, A.; Scutt, J. N. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2331-2334. (b)
Larionov, O. V.; Kozhushkov, S. I.; Brandl, M.; de Meijere, A. MendeleeV
Commun. 2003, 5, 199-200. (c) Jain, R. P.; Vederas, J. C. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 4669-4672.
(7) Masiukiewicz, E.; Wiejak, S.; Rzeszotarska, B. Org. Prep. Proced.
Int. 2002 34, 531-537 and references therein.
(8) Zlatopolskiy, B. Dissertation, Georg-August-Universita¨t, Go¨ttingen,
Germany, 2003.
(5) Recent enantioselective approaches to â-lactones: (a) Yang, H. W.;
Romo, D. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 6403-6434. (b) Nelson, S. G.; Zhu, C.;
Shen, X. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14-15. (c) Schmidt, J. A. R.;
Mahadevan, V.; Getzler, Y. D. Y. L.; Coates, G. W. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
373-376.
2154
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 13, 2004