evaluation of extracts of this organism.3 It was assigned as
a member of the amphilectane class of diterpenes, and the
appearance of the benzoxazole functionality was highlighted
as particularly noteworthy, due to its rare occurrence in
natural products. Biological evaluation of 1 demonstrated
potent inhibitory activity (97% at 12.5 µg/mL) against M.
tuberculosis H37Rv.
Scheme 2
Recent synthetic studies by Corey and co-workers have
established that the original structure assigned to 1 is
incorrect.4 The originally assigned structure had the incorrect
configuration at C-7. It is the structure proposed by Corey
that is shown in 1. Recently, Corey and co-workers con-
firmed their assignment through the total synthesis of 1.5
We considered pseudopteroxazole to be a target particu-
larly suited to methodology we had developed involving the
stereoselective, intramolecular addition of sulfoximine car-
banions to R,â-unsaturated esters.6 In this Letter, we report
on our progress toward pseudopteroxazole and present a very
highly selective intramolecular Friedel-Crafts alkylation
reaction.
benzothiazine formation to protonation of the intermediate
enolate on its less-hindered face.9 As shown in 6, models
suggest that the enolate intermediate will adopt a conforma-
tion in which one face of the enolate is significantly more
congested than the other. This model explains the stereo-
chemistry of the major product of the reaction. Unfortunately,
5 has the wrong stereochemistry at the methyl-bearing
carbon, at least with respect to a projected pseudopteroxazole
synthesis. We nevertheless pushed this material forward in
order to evaluate the viability of subsequent steps.
We began our study with the ester 2,7 whose coupling with
sulfoximine 3 proceeded uneventfully (Scheme 1) to afford
We therefore addressed this problem through reduction,
oxidation, and epimerization. Thus, reduction and a “long”
Swern oxidation of 5 afforded aldehydes 10 and 11 in a 1.6:1
ratio (Scheme 3). We simply allowed the basic reaction
mixture to stir after the oxidation was complete to effect
epimerization. Without separation, these compounds were
treated with the Wittig reagent derived from 12 to give 13
and 14 in 52 and 33% yields, respectively, as single
stereoisomers. These compounds were separable. Each was
treated individually with methanesulfonic acid.5 The results
are intriguing. Diene 13 afforded 15 as a single diastereomer
in 88% yield. The structure of this compound was confirmed
by X-ray analysis. When 14 was treated under the same
reaction conditions, 16 was formed in 81% yield as a 3.6:1
ratio of diastereomers.
Scheme 1
This last result is very significant. Related cyclizations
reported in the literature are often not selective or selective
in the opposite stereochemical sense.4,5,9,10 One exception to
this generalization was reported by Corey and co-workers,
who demonstrated a stereochemical divergence in the reac-
tion of 17a and 17b with methanesulfonic acid.10d While
compound 17a afforded 20 and 21 with a diastereoselectivity
of 25:1, 17b afforded the corresponding compounds in a ratio
of 1:8.
This result was rationalized on the basis of the different
directing effects of the substituents on the aromatic ring of
4.8 Interestingly, we had reported that ester 7 reacted with
sulfoximine 3 to afford both sulfoximine and benzothiazine
products 8 and 9 under our standard coupling conditions
(Scheme 2).6 Apparently, the presence of the methyl group
on 2 was sufficient to prevent benzothiazine formation.
Treatment of 4 with LDA followed by protic quench afforded
the benzothiazine 5 as a 10:1 mixture of diastereomers in
88% yield. We attribute the selectivity observed in the
(4) Johnson, T. W.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4475-
4479.
(5) Davidson, J. P.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13486-
13489.
(6) Harmata, M.; Hong, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5754-5756.
(7) See Supporting Information.
(8) (a) Harmata, M.; Pavri, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2419-
2422. (b) Bolm, C.; Hildebrand, J. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5731-
5734.
(2) Newton S. M.; Lau, C.; Wright, C. W. Phytother. Res. 2000, 14,
303-322.
(3) Rodr´ıguez, A. D.; Ram´ırez, C.; Rodr´ıguez, I. I.; Gonza´lez, E. Org.
Lett. 1999, 1, 527-530.
(9) A very similar transition state model has been proposed to rationalize
the stereochemical outcome of the reaction of a related enolate. See: Chow,
R.; Kocienski, P. J.; Kuhl, A.; LeBrazidec, J.-Y.; Muir, K.; Fish, P. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 2344-2355.
2202
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 13, 2004