72
J.-H. Kim et al.
portionwised to an acetic acid-propionic acid mixed solution (1:1, 20 ml) under 10◦C, and
then the mixture was cooled less than 5◦C while a nitrosylsulfuric acid was being dropped.
Diazotization was checked by TLC. The resulting diazonium solution was added slowly to
a vigorously stirred solution of N,N-diethylaniline (0.60ml, 0.40mmol) dissolved in 99%
acetic acid with crushed ice, and then the mixture was stirred for 1hr at 5◦C. After the
reaction was completed, the mixture was neutralized by using aqueous sodium hydroxide
solution (25%) [2]. The resulting disazo dye was filtered, and washed with water several
times, then dried and purified by column chromatography with n-hexane (95%) : ethyl
acetate (99.5%) (SiO2, n-hexane:ethyl acetate = 5:1).
All other disazo dyes were prepared in a similar procedure.
Dye 4 Yield: 41%. C20H19N7O4S 1H NMR(CDCl3), δ: 6.93–8.37 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 8.38
(s, 1H, 2-thiophene), 3.35 (m, 4H, N-CH2-), 1.12 (t, 6H, -CH3). Found C: 52.69; H: 4.25;
N: 21.78; S: 7.25 Calculated C: 52.97; H: 4.22; N: 21.62; S: 7.07, MS 453.47(M+)
Dye 5 Yield: 56%. C19H19N7O2S 1H NMR(CDCl3), δ: 9.05 (s, 1H, thiazole) 6.99–8.44
(m, 8H, Ar-H), 3.45 (m, 4H, N-CH2-), 1.19 (t, 6H, -CH3). Found C: 55.62; H: 4.59; N:
23.65; S: 7.98 Calculated C: 55.73; H: 4.68; N: 23.95; S: 7.83, MS 409.96(M+)
Dye 6 Yield: 63%. C19H13N7O2S 1H NMR(CDCl3), δ: 8.08–8.64 (m, 3H, benzothia-
zole), 6.85–8.11 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 5.35 (s, 2H, -NH2). Found C: 56.35; H: 3.35; N: 24.50; S:
7.54 Calculated C: 56.57; H: 3.25; N: 24.30; S: 7.95, MS 403.42(M+)
1
Dye 7 Yield: 67%. C23H21N7O2S H NMR(CDCl3), δ: 8.10–8.67 (m, 3H, benzoth-
iazole), 6.99–8.45 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 3.41 (m, 4H, N-CH2-), 1.20 (t, 6H, -CH3). Found C:
60.01; H: 4.64; N: 21.21; S: 6.98 Calculated C: 60.12; H: 4.61; N: 21.34; S: 6.93, MS
459.52(M+)
1
Dye 8 Yield: 65%. C27H29N7O2S H NMR(CDCl3), δ: 8.10–8.69 (m, 3H, benzoth-
iazole), 6.98–8.47 (m, 8H, Ar-H), 3.78 (m, 4H, N-CH2-), 1.56 (m, 4H, -CH2-), 1.38 (m,
4H, -CH2-), 0.98 (t, 6H, -CH3). Found C: 62.56; H: 5.56; N: 19.31; S: 6.15 Calculated C:
62.89; H: 5.67; N: 19.01; S: 6.22, MS 515.63(M+)
Dye 9 Yield: 60%. C23H15N7O2S 1H NMR(CDCl3), δ: 8.08–8.67 (m, 3H, benzothia-
zole), 7.16–8.19(m, 10H, Ar-H), 5.83 (s, 2H, -NH2). Found C: 62.56; H: 3.87; N: 10.51;
S: 6.45 Calculated C: 62.36; H: 3.98; N: 10.36; S: 6.66, MS 453.48(M+)
Dye 10 Yield: 62%. C25H19N7O2S 1H NMR(CDCl3), δ: 7.60–8.26 (m, 3H, benzoth-
iazole), 7.18–8.16(m, 10H, Ar-H), 3.08 (s, 4H, -CH3). Found C: 40.54; H: 2.48; N: 23.95;
S: 10.86 Calculated C: 40.96; H: 2.41; N: 23.88; S: 10.93, MS 481.53(M+)
Structural Analysis and Measurement of Absorption Spectra
Structural analysis of synthesized dyes were measured using an EA 1108 (E.A.) and an HP
6890 & Agilent 5973N MSD (GC-Mass).1H-NMR data were obtained with a Bruker 400
spectrometer using CDCl3 as solvent and TMS as internal standard. UV-visible absorption
spectra were obtained from Shimadzu UV-2100.
Results and Discussion
Calculations by the PPP-MO Method
The PPP-MO procedure has been used to calculate the anticipated absorption spectra in
the visible range as well as the fluorescence absorption maxima of the dyes [7–11], and
PI SYSTEMTM for windows is a commercial program based on a modified PPP SCF-CI-
MO method for rapid and convenient calculations. All bonding and nonbonding interactions