swainsonine, which is inter alia a new potential chemother-
apeutic agent.11 The high importance of further derivatives
is underlined by recent patents on analogs of halofuginone
as inhibitors for tRNA synthetases.12
The majority of the reported1bꢀd,13,14 syntheses suffer
from some drawbacks: They are elaborate (far more than
10 steps), specific on one of the above-mentioned targets
(either in cis- or trans-configuration), and not proven to
be scalable. Considering the versatile pharmacological
activities of compounds based on the 3-piperidinol scaf-
fold, the development of a stereodivergent, scalable, and
efficient synthetic access is highly desirable.
Herein, we report a step economic (5ꢀ6 steps), scalable,
and stereodivergent synthesis of trans- and cis-2-substituted
3-piperidinols A in high diastereoselectivities (up to >19:1)
and enantiopurities (ee = 90ꢀ99%) originating from the
ketone intermediates C (Figure 1).
In the syntheses of potentially new drug candidates
scalability is a significant factor to provide sufficient sub-
stance amounts for clinical testing.15 Furthermore, alter-
natives in reactions driven by the formation of phosphine
oxides from phosphines (e.g., the Appel and Mitsunobu
reactions) are highly desired to improve atom economy
(reduced waste amounts) and to circumvent difficulties in
the separation of these byproducts.16 Numerous protocols
have been developed to improve these issues, mostly based
on polymer bound or otherwise modified (more complex)
phosphines.16 Surprisingly, in this context simple and
inexpensive phosphites (P(OR)3) have only been applied
as phosphine substitutes in one single and specific
example.17
Figure 1. Selected examples for bioactive piperidine derivatives
and retrosynthetic analysis of 3-hydroxyl piperidines A (X = OH
or leaving group, [Hꢀ] = hydride reducing agent, TS = transition
state).
(11) (a) Guengerich, F. P.; DiMari, S. J.; Broquist, H. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 2055–2056. (b) Elbein, A. D. FASEB J. 1991, 5,
3055–3063.
(12) (a) Teitelbaum, S. L.; Deselm, C. J. U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. (2011),
US20110311519A1. (b) Keller, T.; Mazitschek, R.; Whitman, M.; Lee, J. U.
S. patent 2011/0263532A1. (c) Keller, T.; Mazitschek, R.; Whitman, M. PCT
Int. Appl. (2010), WO 2010019210 A2.
We intended to control the diastereoselectivity in A
(cis/trans) through a targeted protecting group (PG) ma-
nipulation resulting in the retrosynthetic analysis shown in
Figure 1:18 Reduction of the common precursor ketone C
(derived from amino acids) should deliver the syn amino
alcohol B according to the FelkinꢀAnh model (due to the
sterically demanding ꢀNBnPG carbamate function).
Further PG cleavage and cyclization should give cis-A.
On the other hand, initial deprotection of C (to liberate the
Lewis basic ꢀNHBn amino moiety) and subsequent re-
duction toward a Cram chelate transition state should
deliver the anti-amino alcohol B. After subsequent cycliza-
tion trans-A would result.
At the outset L-alanine 1a, L-phenylalanine 1b, and
L-phenylglycine 1c were converted to their N-benzyl-N-
Cbz protected derivatives 2aꢀ2c in a novel practical one-
pot procedure through the combination of Quitt’s reductive
benzylation protocol19 and SchottenꢀBaumann acylation
in 70ꢀ79% yield (Scheme 1). Thereby not only one workup
was spared, but also the overall yield was improved signifi-
cantly (e.g., 40% (two steps) f 70% for 2a).
(13) For leading references, see: (a) Pansare, S. A.; Paul, E. K. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 2119–2125. (b) Bilke, J. L.; Moore, S. P.;
O’Brien, P.; Gilday, J. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1935–1938. (c) Cochi, A.;
Burger, B.; Navarro, C.; Pardo, D. G.; Cossy, J.; Zhao, Y.; Cohen, T.
Synlett 2009, 2157–2161. (d) Lemire, A.; Grenon, M.; Pourashraf, M.;
Charette, A. B. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3517–3520.
(14) For a review on the synthesis of L-733,060 and L-733,061, see:
(a) Cochi, A.; Pardo, D. G.; Cossy, J. Heterocycles 2012, 86, 89–116. For
reviews on the synthesis of (3-hydroxy-) pipecolic acid derivatives, see:
(b) Cochi, A.; Pardo, D. G.; Cossy, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 809–829.
(c) Cant, A. A.; Sutherland, A. Synthesis 2012, 44, 1935–1950.
(d) Kadouri-Puchot, C.; Comesse, S. Amino Acids 2005, 29, 101–130.
(15) (a) Shioiri, T.; Izawa, K.; Konoike, T.; Karpf. M. Pharmaceu-
tical Process Chemistry; Wiley VCH: Weinheim, 2010; pp 1ꢀ37.
(b) Roberge, D. M. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2004, 8, 1049–1053.
(16) For reviews, see: (a) Constable, D. J. C.; Dunn, P. J.; Hayler,
J. D.; Humphrey, G. R.; Leazer, J. L., Jr.; Linderman, R. J.; Lorenz, K.;
Manley, J.; Pearlman, B. A.; Wells, A.; Zaks, A.; Zhang, T. Y. Green
Chem. 2007, 9, 411–420. (b) Dandapani, S.; Curran, D. P. Chem.;Eur.
J. 2004, 10, 3130–3138. (c) Dembinski, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 2763–
2772.
(17) For a Mitsunobu condensation of a guanine derived nucleoside
analog with activated benzylic alcohols utilizing P(OiPr)3 providing
simplified byproduct separation through improved water solubility
ꢀ
(of (OdP(OiPr)3), see: (a) Veliz, E. A.; Beal, P. A. Tetrahedron Lett.
2006, 47, 3153–3156. In our case we were not able to remove stoichio-
metric amounts of OP(OEt)3 (which is more hydrophilic than OP(OiPr)3)
through an aqueous workup (without saponification). P(OEt)5, prepared
from P(OEt)3 with diethyl peroxide and ethyl benzenesulfenate, respec-
tively, in an additional step, was reported to induce cyclization of diols to
furans and pyrans: (b) Chang, B. C.; Conrad, W. E.; Denney, D. B.;
Denney, D. Z.; Edelman, R.; Powell, R. L.; White, D. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1971, 93, 4004–4009. (c) Denney, D. B.; Denney, D. Z.; Gigantino,
J. J. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 2831–2832. Thereby, the volatile products
were separated from OdP(OEt)3 through distillation. For a recent
cyclodehydration of diols, see: (d) Kelly, B. D.; Lambert, T. H. Org. Lett.
2011, 13, 740–743.
(18) Four examples following a related strategy have been reported:
(a) Reyes, E.; Ruiz, N.; Vicario, J. L.; Badia, D.; Carrillo, L. Synthesis
2011, 443–450. (b) Fraser, D. S.; Park, S. B.; Chong, J. M. Can. J. Chem.
2004, 82, 87–101. (c) Chung, S.-K.; Lee, J.-M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1999, 1441–1444. (d) Dondoni, A.; Perrone, A. Synthesis 1993, 1162–
1176. For an early example of diastereodiscriminating reductions of
amino ketones, see: (e) Stevens, C. L.; TerBeek, K. J.; Pillai, P. M. J. Org.
Chem. 1974, 26, 3943–3946. For the FelkinꢀAnh model, see: (f) Cherest,
M.; Felkin, H.; Prudent, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 9, 2199–2204.
(19) Quitt, P.; Hellerbach, J.; Vogler, K. Helv. Chim. Acta 1963, 46,
327–333.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 20, 2013
5179