treated with water, extracted with ether, then flash chromato-
graphed (hexane : CH2Cl2 97 : 3). The title product 7 was
recovered as a pale-orange solid (710 mg, yield 73%). 1H NMR
(80 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.21 (d, J ~ 4.90 Hz, 2H, a thiophene),
6.96 (d, J ~ 4.90 Hz, 2H, b thiophene), 3.20 (t, J ~ 6.56 Hz,
4H, CH2Br), 2.10 (m, 4H, CH2CH2CH2Br), 1.40 (m, 4H,
CH2CH2CH2Br).
adjusted to 5 with conc. HCl solution. After the usual work-up,
the residue of the organic layer was column chromatographed
(silica gel/hexane : AcOEt 9 : 1). The central fractions gave 13
as a colorless solid (860 mg, yield ~ 60%). 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) d 7.33 (d, J ~ 2.53 Hz, 1H, H–Ar), 7.29 (d, J ~
2.51 Hz, 1H, H–Ar), 7.19 (dd, J1 ~ 8.70 Hz, J2 ~ 2.53 Hz, 1H,
H–Ar), 7.11 (dd, J1 ~ 8.42 Hz, J2 ~ 2.52 Hz, 1H, H–Ar), 7.00
(s, 1H, OH), 6.81 (d, J ~ 8.70 Hz, 1H, H–Ar), 6.78 (d, J ~
8.44 Hz, 1H, H–Ar), 3.96 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.92 (s, 2H, CH2),
1.30 (s, 9H, 3 t-Bu), 1.28 (s, 9H, 3 t-Bu).
Synthesis of 8. Dry K2CO3 (0.29 g, 2.1 mmol) and 7 (0.72 g,
1.71 mmol) were added to a stirred suspension of calix[4]arene
(3a) (1.12 g, 1.73 mmol) in dry CH3CN (50 mL). The mixture
was refluxed for 20 hours, then filtered and evaporated to
dryness. Column chromatography (silica gel/petroleum ether :
Et2O 95 : 5) gave 8 (0.94 g, yield 60%) in a pure state as a
Synthesis of monomer 2. A solution of 13 (761 mg,
2.33 mmol) in dry DMF (30 ml) was dropped into a stirred
mixture of a 60% NaH slurry in mineral oil (97 mg, 2.42 mmol)
and dry DMF (30 ml) under nitrogen at room temperature.
The mixture was heated at 40 uC for 20 minutes, then a solution
of 7 (482 mg, 1.15 mmol) in dry DMF (50 mL) was added.
After 12 hours standing at room temperature, solvent was
removed under reduced pressure and the residue treated with
Et2O and H2O. The residue obtained from the organic layer
after the usual work-up was column chromatographed (silica
gel/hexane : AcOEt 95 : 5) to give 2 as a colorless solid (789 mg,
1
colorless solid (dec. 320 uC). H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d
9.35 (s, 2H, 2 OH), 7.19 (d, J ~ 4.90 Hz, 2H, a thiophene), 7.15
(d, J ~ 4.90 Hz, 2H, b thiophene), 7.10 (s, 4H, H–Ar), 7.04 (s,
4H, H–Ar), 4.36 (d, J ~ 12.72 Hz, 4H, CH2–Ar), 3.41 (d, J ~
12.72 Hz, 4H, CH2–Ar), 4.08 (broad t, 4H, 2 CH2O), 2.45
(broad m, 8H, 2 CH2CH2CH2O), 1.21 (s, 18H, 2 t-Bu), 1.18 (s,
18H, 2 t-Bu). EI-MS m/z (relative intensity) 906.
1
yield 75%) (mp 54–61 uC from i-PrOH). H NMR (300 MHz,
Synthesis of monomer 1. A 60% NaH slurry in mineral oil
(150 mg, 3.75 mmol) was added portionwise to a stirred
solution of 8 (605 mg, 0.67 mmol) in THF–DMF 10 : 1(30 mL).
When gas evolution stopped, (CH3)2SO4 (0.80 mL, 8.4 mmol)
was added, then the mixture was refluxed for 2 hours. Solvent
was removed under reduced pressure and the residue treated
with a 5% NaOH solution and Et2O under stirring. The residue
obtained from the organic layer, after the usual work-up, was
column chromatographed (silica gel/petroleum ether : Et2O 95 :
5) to give 1 in a pure state (219 mg, yield 35%) as a colorless
solid with mp w 210 uC. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.28 (d,
J ~ 5.00 Hz, 2H, a thiophene), 7.20 (d, J ~ 5.00 Hz, 2H, b
thiophene), 7.15 (s, 4H, H–Ar), 6.60 (s, 4H, H–Ar), 4.40 (d, J ~
15.00 Hz, 4H, CH2–Ar), 3.19 (d, J ~ 15.00 Hz, 4H, 2 CH2–Ar),
3.85 (s, 6H, 2 OCH3), 3.76 (t, J ~ 4.00 Hz, 4H, 2 CH2O), 2.60
(m, 4H, 2 CH2CH2CH2O), 2.21 (m, 4H, 2 CH2CH2CH2O),
1.30 (s, 18H, 2 t-Bu), 1.20 (s, 18H, 2 t-Bu). EI-MS m/z (relative
intensity) 934. Elemental analysis: calc for C61H74S2O4: C
78.17, H 8.06%; found C 78.08 H 7.95%.
CDCl3) d 7.15–7.07 (m, 6H, H–Ar and a thiophene), 7.01 (d,
J ~ 2.48 Hz, 2H, H–Ar), 6.83 (d, J ~ 4.88 Hz, 2H, b
thiophene), 6.75 (d, J ~ 8.50 Hz, 2H, H–Ar), 6.59 (d, J ~
8.38 Hz, 2H, H–Ar), 3.90 (s, 4H, 2 CH2–Ar), 3.78 (s, 6H, 2
OCH3), 3.65 (t, J ~ 6.26 Hz, 4H, 2 CH2O), 1.94 (m, 4H, 2
CH2CH2CH2O), 1.29 (m, 4H, 2 CH2CH2CH2O), 1.21 (s, 18H,
2 t-Bu), 1.18 (s, 18H, 2 t-Bu); EI-MS m/z (relative intensity)
910. Elemental analysis: calc for C59 H74S2O4: C 77.76, H
8.18%; found C 77.44 H 8.07%.
Electrochemical experiments
Chemicals and reagents. Acetonitrile was distilled twice over
P2O5 and once over CaH2. Tetrabutylammonium perchlorate
(Bu4NClO4) was dried under vacuum at 70 uC. All other
chemicals were reagent grade and used as received.
General procedures and apparatus. Experiments were per-
formed at 25 uC under nitrogen in three electrode cells in 0.1 M
Bu4NClO4 acetonitrile solution. The counterelectrode was
platinum; reference electrode was a silver/0.1 M silver per-
chlorate acetonitrile solution (0.34 V vs. SCE). The voltam-
metric apparatus (AMEL, Italy) included a 551 potentiostat
modulated by a 568 programmable function generator and
coupled to a 731 digital integrator.
The working electrode for cyclic voltammetry was a plati-
num minidisc electrode (0.003 cm2). For electronic spectro-
scopy a 0.8 6 2.5 cm2 indium tin oxide (ITO) sheet (ca. 80%
transmittance, ca. 20 ohm/square resistance, from Balzers,
Liechtenstein) was used.
Bis(5-tert-butyl-2-hydroxyphenyl)methane. A solution of
4-tert-butylphenol (11.91 g, 79.3 mmol) in dry Et2O (25 mL)
was added dropwise to a stirred solution of EtMgBr (26 mL,
78 mmol) in dry Et2O (70 mL) under nitrogen. Most of the
solvent was removed by careful heating and replaced with dry
toluene (70 mL), then the mixture was progressively heated
to the reflux temperature removing the residual Et2O by
distillation. After a further addition of dry toluene (150 mL),
paraformaldehyde (1.18 g, 39.3 mmol) was added and the
mixture refluxed for 3 hours, then treated with water. After the
usual work-up, the crude reaction product (12.8 g), constituted
by a mixture of oligomers, was flash chromatographed (silica
gel/CHCl3). The final fractions eluted gave bis(5-tert-butyl-2-
hydroxyphenyl)methane, as a colorless solid (4.84 g, yield 40%)
(mp 151–154 uC). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.32 (d, J ~
2.44 Hz, 2H, H–Ar), 7.12 (broad s, 2H, 2 OH), 7.10 (dd, J1 ~
8.42 Hz, J2 ~ 2.43 Hz, 2H, H–Ar), 6.75 (d, J ~ 8.40 Hz, 2H,
H–Ar), 3.95 (s, 2H, CH2), 1.30 (s, 18H, 2 t-Bu); EI-MS m/z
(relative intensity) 312.
Electronic spectra were taken with a Perkin-Elmer Lambda
15 spectrometer; FTIR spectra on a Perkin Elmer FTIR 2000
spectrometer. The apparatus and procedures used in the in-situ
conductivity experiments were previously described in detail.17
QCM measurements were performed with a platinum-coated
AT-cut quartz electrode (0.2 cm2), resonating at 6 MHz, onto
which the polymers were deposited as thin (ca. 10 mg cm22
)
films. Calibration of the quartz crystal microbalance was
performed with silver deposition from a 1022 M solution of
AgNO3 in acetonitrile 1 0.1 M Bu4NClO4. The oscillator
circuit was home-made and the frequency counter was a
Hewlett-Packard mod.5316B. Monitoring of vapor uptake was
performed with the QCM inserted in a cell taking part of a
closed loop of 5 L, flushed with nitrogen by a gas pump
operating at a rate of 2.5 L min21 flow. Vapor additions were
performed by injecting the solvent as a liquid by means of a
microsiringe.
(5-tert-Butyl-2-hydroxyphenyl)-(5-tert-butyl-2-methoxyphenyl)-
methane (13). Sodium metal (112 mg, 4.87 mmol) was dissolved
into a solution of bis(5-tert-butyl-2-hydroxyphenyl)methane
(1.37 g, 4.38 mmol) in dry EtOH (35 mL) under nitrogen at
room temperature. Iodomethane (692 mg, 4.87 mmol) was
added and the solution refluxed for 2 hours at 80 uC. After
removal of the solvent, H2O and Et2O were added and the pH
1 8 1 0
J . M a t e r . C h e m . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 4 , 1 8 0 4 – 1 8 1 1