effective methodologies now exist to generate such deriva-
tives as single diastereoisomers from R-amino aldehydes,9
the installation of the 4-hydroxy group has proved much
more difficult and no general stereoselective methodology
currently exists for this purpose (Figure 1). This report
then Swern) in 73% overall yield.18 Subsequent installation
of the vinyl moiety could have been achieved stereoselec-
tively,9,19 but in this case a simple Grignard reaction was
preferred because, fortunately, both of the allyl alcohols could
be easily isolated as single diastereomers by chromatography
on silica gel. The stereoselective iodoamination of allyl
acetate (1a-e) afforded a minimum 25:1 ratio of cis and
trans isomers of iodoacetates, and the single trans isomer
(2a-e) was used for the subsequent Woodward-Prevost
reaction (Table 1).
Table 1. a
Figure 1.
describes the rational design of a chiral synthon for applica-
tion of Woodward-Prevost reaction to 3,4-cis- and 3,4-trans-
pyrrolidinediols stereodivergently.
entry
conditions
time (h)
yieldb (%)
dec (%)
As first noted by Winstein,10 R-haloacetates in the presence
of metal carboxylates are easily transformed to the corre-
sponding cis or trans diols by stereoselective nucleophilic
displacement at the R-carbon.11 This reaction refined by
1
2
3
4
5
toluene, rt
>100
76
75
85
94
68
trace
>95
>95
>95
>95
d
toluene, 60 °C
toluene, reflux
CH2Cl2, reflux
THF, 60 °C
4
24
12
12
Woodward and Prevost13 involves the in situ generation
of R-iodoacetate in a one-pot reaction. Although it has proved
to be powerful methodology for stereoselective dihydroxy-
lation, the vast majority of the examples suffer from a number
of problems, such as poor facial selectivity of epi-iodination
in cyclic substrates,14 low reactivity of the haloacetate due
to steric constraints,15 and low yields.16 However, many of
the associated flaws can be circumvented by preforming the
R-haloacetate and treating this species with the required
Lewis acid. We previously reported that iodoamination of
allyl acetate gives a novel iodoacetate precursor with high
yield and stereoselectivity via endocyclization (Scheme 1).17
a The reactions were all run at 0.2 M concentration. b Isolated yield.
1
c Determined by H NMR integration. d Not determined.
Initially, precursor 2a was chosen as a substrate on which
to test the utility, both with respect to the diversity and
selectivity, of the Woodward-Prevost reaction in this system.
Compound 2a was treated with silver(I) salts under a range
of reaction conditions, while varying the solvent and tem-
perature (Scheme 2). It was found that low polarity solvent
and vigorous conditions gave optimal results in this reaction.
Thus iodoacetate was treated with AgOAc at reflux for 4 h
in dry toluene to give the expected 3,4-trans-diacetate 5 as
the sole product in 94% yield via intermolecular substitution
at the C4-position (vida infra). Both yield and selectivity
were very sensitive to the water content of reaction mixture.
Diacetate 5 could subsequently be converted to the trans-
3,4-diol 3a, as proved by NOESY data, in >95% de by
treatment with LiAlH4 in 98% yield. Synthesis of the C4
epimer 4a was attempted using Woodward-type conditions
on the same starting material 2a. Hence, treatment of 2a with
AgBF4 in wet toluene at room temperature for 12 h yielded
two isomeric hydroxy acyl compounds 6 and 7, which were
separable by chromatography on silica in a 1:1 ratio in 72%
yield. Treatment of these monoacyl derivatives with LiAlH4
Scheme 1
The required starting materials were easily prepared from
commercially available phenylalanine, tyrosine, serine, va-
line, and alanine, which were esterified with MeOH/TMSCl,
protected with Pf, and then reduced to aldehyde (LiAlH4,
(9) Reetz, M. T.; Drewes, M. W.; Schmitz, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1987, 26, 1141. (b) Lee, B. W.; Lee J. H.; Jang, K. C.; Kang, J. E.
K.; Kim, J. H.; Park, K. M.; Park, K. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5905.
(c) Vuljanic, T.; Kihlberg, J.; Somfai, P. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 279.
(10) Winstein S.; Buckles R. E. J. Org. Chem. 1942, 64, 2769.
(11) For other example of carbohydrates as neighboring groups, see: (a)
Shoji M.; Yamaguchi J.; Kakeya H.; Osada H.; Hayashi Y. Angew Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3192. (b) Xiao D.; Vera M. D.; Liang B.; Joullie M. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 2734. (c) Imperato F. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 3478.
(12) Woodward, R. B.; Brutcher, F. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80,
209.
(14) (a) Brimble, M. A.; Nairn, M. R. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4801.
(b) Whitesell, J. K.; Minton, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6403.
(15) Hamm, S.; Hennig, L.; Findeisen, M.; Muller, D.; Welzel, P.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 1345.
(16) Kamano, P. Y.; Pettit, G. R.; Tozawa, M.; Komeichi, Y.; Inoue,
M. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 2136.
(17) Lee, W. S.; Jang, K. C.; Kim, J. H.; Park, K. H. Chem. Commun.
1999, 251.
(18) Sardina, F. J.; Rapoport, H. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96 (6), 1825
(19) (a) Maurer, P. J.; Knudsen, C. G.; Palkowitz, A. D.; Rapoport, H.
J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50 (3), 325. (b) Roemmele, R. C.; Rapoport, H. J.
Org. Chem. 1989, 54 (8), 1866.
(13) Prevost C. Compt. Rend. 1933, 196, 1129.
2274
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 13, 2004