Synthesis and radioprotective activity of mitochondria targeted dihydropyridines in vitro

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/ijms18112233

The radiation-induced damage to mitochondrial oxidative respiratory chain could lead to generating of superoxide anions (O^2-) and secondary reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are the major resources of continuous ROS production after radiation. Scavenging radiation-induced ROS effectively can help mitochondria to maintain their physiological function and relief cells from oxidative stress. Dihydropyridines (DHPs) are biomimetic hydrogen sources that could protect cells against radiation damage. In this study, we designed and synthetized three novel mitochondrial-targeted dihydropyridines (Mito-DHPs) that utilize the mitochondrial membrane potential to enter the organelle and scavenge ROS. MitoTracker confirmed Mito-DHPs accumulation in mitochondria, and the DCFH-DA assay demonstrated effective ROS scavenging activity. In addition, the γ-H2AX and comet assay demonstrated the ability of Mito-DHPs to protect against both radiation and ROS-induced DNA strand breaks. Furthermore, Mito-DHP1 proved to be non-toxic and displayed significant radioprotection activity (p < 0.05) in vitro. Mito-DHPs are therefore promising antioxidants that could penetrate the membrane of mitochondria, scavenge excessive ROS, and protect cells against radiation-induced oxidative damage.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/ijms18112233

International Journal of
Molecular Sciences
Article
Synthesis and Radioprotective Activity of
Mitochondria Targeted Dihydropyridines In Vitro
Yurui Zhang 1 ID , Junying Wang 2, Yuanyuan Li 1, Feng Wang 3, Fujun Yang 1 and Wenqing Xu 1,
*
1
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine,
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, China;
tianchuanruirui@163.com (Y.Z.); yuanyuanli0929@163.com (Y.L.); fjyang32@126.com (F.Y.)
2
Department of Physics, School of Sciences and Tianjin Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science
and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; wangjunying@tju.edu.cn
Department of Statistics, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin 300222, China;
kathrinewang95@outlook.com
3
*
Correspondence: xuwenqing@irm-cams.ac.cn; Tel.: +86-022-8568-3049
Received: 19 September 2017; Accepted: 23 October 2017; Published: 25 October 2017
Abstract: The radiation-induced damage to mitochondrial oxidative respiratory chain could lead
to generating of superoxide anions (O2−) and secondary reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are
the major resources of continuous ROS production after radiation. Scavenging radiation-induced
ROS effectively can help mitochondria to maintain their physiological function and relief cells
from oxidative stress. Dihydropyridines (DHPs) are biomimetic hydrogen sources that could
protect cells against radiation damage. In this study, we designed and synthetized three novel
mitochondrial-targeted dihydropyridines (Mito-DHPs) that utilize the mitochondrial membrane
potential to enter the organelle and scavenge ROS. MitoTracker confirmed Mito-DHPs accumulation
in mitochondria, and the DCFH-DA assay demonstrated effective ROS scavenging activity.
In addition, the γ-H2AX and comet assay demonstrated the ability of Mito-DHPs to protect against
both radiation and ROS-induced DNA strand breaks. Furthermore, Mito-DHP1 proved to be
non-toxic and displayed significant radioprotection activity (p < 0.05) in vitro. Mito-DHPs are
therefore promising antioxidants that could penetrate the membrane of mitochondria, scavenge
excessive ROS, and protect cells against radiation-induced oxidative damage.
Keywords: reactive oxygen species (ROS); oxidative stress; mitochondrial targeted; radiation damage
1. Introduction
Radiation technology is increasingly applied in physical and medical fields such as nuclear energy
and radiotherapy, which is still a dominating way for cancer treatment [1]. Radiation-induced damage
is a tremendous potential threat to human body. Although screening and synthesis of radio-protective
compounds are well established, but few effective compounds are currently available except the
amino-thiols [
2–
4
], polyphenols [5], and growth factor [6,7], all of which also have undesirable side
effects limited their clinical applications [
7
]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop substances that
protect cells and tissues against radiation-induced injury.
Exposure to ionizing radiation results in oxidative stress, DNA damage, aging, chronic disease,
cancers, and death. Radiation-induced damage can be divided into direct and indirect damage [8].
Direct damage causes damage of DNA and proteins under the high energy rays, while indirect damage
is caused by excessive reactive oxidative species (ROS). Actually, the intracellular ROS burst was mostly
ascribed to radiation-induced mitochondria damage [
oxidative respiration through the process of oxidative phosphorylation [10
9
]. Mitochondria are responsible for cellular
11], where the potential
,
damaging free radical superoxide anion was constantly produced [12
,13]. Mitochondrial disturbance
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2233; doi:10.3390/ijms18112233
www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2233
2 of 10
could lead enormous free radicals released towards cytoplasm, trigger chain reactions, and ultimately
turn the cell into pathological conditions [14]. Therefore, once mitochondrial dysfunction happens,
the excessive ROS—such as superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radical—with high chemical
reactivity, could destroy cell structures through interacting with functional molecules such as fatty
acids, nucleic acids, and proteins and ultimately disrupting cell functions [15]. Ionizing radiation not
only causes mitochondrial dysfunction by increasing oxidative stress [9,16], but also causes apoptosis
and autophagy through ROS-mediated regulation of various pathways, because mitochondria are
involved in signaling the oxidative state to the nucleus [17]. Furthermore, evidence suggests that
nuclear DNA is the primary target of ionizing radiation, since ROS reaction with DNA appears to
lead to genomic instability. Currently, various naturally occurring antioxidants could scavenge ROS,
but they may have unacceptable toxicity at the same time [18,19]. Therefore, finding an effective
antioxidant with low cell toxicities is still an urgent problem to be solved.
1,4-dihydropyridines (DHPs) are a large, structurally diverse group of Ca2+ antagonists [20].
They have excellent antioxidant properties and ROS scavenging abilities [14]. However, despite their
powerful free-radical scavenging capabilities, DHPs cannot be accumulated to mitochondria largely
without the positive charged lipophilic structure. In this study, we designed and synthesized three
novel DHPs derivatives that included a positively charged triphenylphosphonium (TPP) group [21].
These novel cationic compounds were able to use the membrane potential, which is critical for ATP
synthesis and maintaining mitochondrial function, to cross the mitochondrial membrane in order to
scavenge ROS and protect against radiation-induced mitochondrial oxidative damage.
2. Results
2.1. Cellular Distributions of Mito-DHPs
The commercially available Mitotracker Red probe [22] contains a mildly thiol-reactive
chloromethyl moiety for labelling mitochondria [23], and we used it to investigate the cellular
distribution of the three new structures, along with Mito-DHPs intrinsic green fluorescence.
The overlapping merged image in Figure 1 suggested that the localization of two labelling molecules
were in good agreement, which confirmed that all three compounds were able to target mitochondria.
Figure 1. Accumulation of Mito-DHPs in the mitochondria of CHO-K1 cells. Fluorescence images
of cells incubated with 10−6 mol/L Mito-DHPs for 2 h and stained with Mitotracker Red (200 nM,
15 min). Merged images show co-localization of Mito-DHP and Mitotracker Red which suggested their
successful targeting to mitochondria.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2233
3 of 10
2.2. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Detection
The dichloro-dihydro-fluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) assay was used to detect intracellular
ROS level after radiation. As shown in Figure 2a, the radiation group had a strong fluorescent signal
after incubation with DCFH-DA. Compared with radiation group, Mito-DHPs pretreated groups
showed weak fluorescence. Among which Mito-DHP1 displayed similar ROS level to cells in control
group. Data obtained from the Infinite F200 multimode plate reader in Figure 2b also proved that
Mito-DHP1, Mito-DHP2, and Mito-DHP3 treated groups displayed reduced accumulation of ROS both
to CHO and HeLa cells (Figure S1). These results suggest the Mito-DHPs were effective intracellular
ROS scavengers that prevented ROS from accumulation and Mito-DHP1 was the most effective
radio-protective compound.
Figure 2. ROS detection using the DCFH-DA agent. (
a) Fluorescence images of CHO-K1 cells from
different groups following incubation with DCFH-DA for 30 min; (
b) ROS level in Mito-DHPs treated
and untreated cells at 24 h after 3 Gy radiation. (* p < 0.05 compared with radiation group).
2.3. Detection of Histone H2AX (γ-H2AX)
Histone H2AX (
marker in an immunofluorescence approach to investigate irradiation-induced DSBs [25]. Images in
Figure 3a showed -H2AX signals (pink spots) on the DAPI background, corresponding data are
presented in Figure 3b. Compared with the radiation group, Mito-DHP1 pretreated group showed
decreased -H2AX foci fluorescence to 654, suggested higher radioprotection than Mito-DHP2 and
Mito-DHP3, which was 1781 and 1885 respectively (Figure 3b). The results suggested that our
γ-H2AX) is a marker of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) [24], and we used this
γ
γ
compounds could effectively reduce
ROS and preventing DNA damage.
γ-H2AX in radiated cells, therefore scavenging radiation-induced
Figure 3. Determination of phosphorylated histone H2AX (
radiation. ( ) Images of cells obtained during the immunofluorescence assay showed
different treatment groups; ( -H2AX foci fluorescence of control, radiation and Mito-DHPs treated
groups after 3 Gy radiation. (* p < 0.05 compared with radiation group).
γ
-H2AX) in CHO-K1 cells at 1 h after
γ
a
γ
-H2AX foci in
b) γ

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2233
4 of 10
2.4. Comet Assay
The Comet assay is commonly used method for evaluating DNA strand breaks, and we
evaluated olive tail moment (OTM) and tail DNA (TD) to further assess radiation-induced DNA
damage [26]. OTM and TD signify the length of DNA in the comet tail relative to total DNA. Images
of nuclear DNA was presented in Figure 4a, radiation group showed obvious DNA tail after radiation.
However, nuclear DNA in compounds treated groups were intact post radiation, comparable with
normal cell nuclear DNA in control group. The OTM and TD analysis results from Figure 4b showed a
significant decrease in mean OTM and TD in Mito-DHPs-treated cells (compared with the radiation
group), which indicated that Mito-DHPs have strong radio-protective abilities. All three compounds
protected DNA against radiation-induced damage. Again, Mito-DHP1 provided higher radioprotection
than Mito-DHP2 and Mito-DHP3 which corresponded well with our previous results.
Figure 4. Comet assay demonstrated DNA damage in CHO-K1 cells after 3Gy γ-radiation. (a) Comet
images from Mito-DHPs treated and untreated groups. Cells from radiation groups displayed clear
tail trailing, whereas tail trailing in Mito-DHPs-treated groups was at a similar level compared with
the non-irradiated control group; (b) Tail DNA (%) and Tail Moment (%) representing nuclear DNA
damage following a 3 Gy radiation dose. These parameters are markedly reduced in cells pretreated
with Mito-DHPs (* p < 0.05).
3. Discussion
When exposed to ionizing radiation, cells produce ROS that cause oxidative stress and attack
bio-macromolecules—such as lipids, nucleic acids, and proteins—which lead lethal consequences
to human body [27
which generates hydroxyl radicals (
few minutes [17 30], but during that time they react with other neutral molecules into radicals in a
,
28]. At beginning, ROS are formed from radiation-induced hydrolysis of water,
•
OH) as the primary ROS [29]. OH radicals exist only for a
•
,
destructive chain reaction. Intracellular ROS attack enzymes involved in oxidative phosphorylation
and the electron transport chain (ETC) in mitochondria [31]. Peroxidation of mitochondria membrane
lipids disrupts enzyme activity and promotes leakage of O2− from the ETC, which is subsequently
converted to H2O2 or hydroxyl radicals through the Fenton reaction as secondary free radicals,
leading to oxidative stress and damage to nuclear DNA [32]. Levels of secondary ROS in mitochondria
are increased after irradiation, causing wide-ranging and persistent oxidative stress [16].

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2233
5 of 10
Mitochondria are known to play an important role in mediating radiation-induced cell
damage [33 35]. Considering the important function of mitochondria, we designed and synthesized
–
a series of dihydropyridines derivative (Mito-DHPs) by incorporating a positively charged
triphenylphosphonium moiety that could target the molecule to mitochondria by facilitating its
passage across the mitochondrial double membranes system. Based on the Nernst equation, the uptake
of Mito-DHPs into mitochondria can increase 10-fold for every 60 mV of membrane potential [36].
Mito-DHPs are accumulated in the cytoplasm with the help of membrane potential (∆ψ), and reach
a concentration that is 5–10-fold higher than outside the cell. Mito-DHPs also could reach a further
500–1000-fold in mitochondria since the mitochondrial membrane potential is further increased.
In our study, Mito-DHP1, Mito-DHP2, and Mito-DHP3 could effectively protect cells from
radiation-induced damage due to their 1,4-dihydropyridine structure, the parent nucleus of
NAD(P)H [37]. On one hand, 1,4-dihydropyridine is a good hydrogen donor [38] through its NH and
C–4 H groups reacting with oxidants and free radicals. Excessive harmful free radicals in organisms are
responsible for developing severe diseases including neurodegenerative disease, aging, obesity, cancer,
and metabolic as well as cardiovascular disorders [39
investigated for decades, most existing antioxidants such as polyphenol or amino-thiol compounds are
unfortunately highly toxic [44 45]. Amino-thiol compounds can influence the concentration of metal
ions such as Ca2+ and cause hypotension [46], whereas polyphenol compounds are metabolized to
quinone, which is toxic to DNA [47 49]. On the other hand, 1,4-dihydropyridine structure represents
–43]. Although effective antioxidants have been
,
–
the active part of reduced coenzyme—NAD(P)H—which is important modulators of various enzymatic
redox reactions and are involved in electron transfer. The study showed thiyl and phenoxyl free radicals
could transform into stable structure through one-electron-transfer reactions with NAD(P)H [50]. It is
also important to maintain a high level of glutathione (GSH), which can help to prevent oxidative stress.
Besides, Mito-DHPs presented lower cell toxicity in CHO-K1 cells (Figure S2) and HeLa cells (Figure S3),
Mito-DHP1 notably displayed minimum toxicity to CHO cells (Figure S2). To investigate whether the
compounds could protect cells from radiation and to determine an appropriate dose for administration,
five doses (10−4 to 10−8 mol/L) were tested for three compounds and cell survival was monitored
by measuring their ability to absorb Neutral Red (NR) dye (Figures S4 and S5), and 10−6 mol/L was
considered as the optimum dosage.
These three compounds protect DNA from radiation-induced damages, and may influence
initiation and propagation of free radicals. As the results show, Mito-DHP1, Mito-DHP2, and Mito-
DHP3 are effective ROS scavengers that are supposed to donate an H atom to free radicals
converting into neutral molecules. Mito-DHP1 is superior to Mito-DHP2 and Mito-DHP3 in protecting
cells against oxidative damage. Mito-DHP2 and Mito-DHP3 (4-phenyl-1,4-dihydropyridine and
4-thiophenyl-1,4-dihydropyridine, respectively) exhibited reasonable lower antioxidative activity
compared with Mito-DHP1 (4-unsubstituted-1,4-dihydropyridine). This finding was consistent
with the results of other studies that substituents at the 4 position appear to diminish antioxidant
activity [51]. Mito-DHP1 not only exhibited excellent radioprotection activity, but also displayed
lower toxicity than the other two compounds. This phenomenon could be ascribed to two
aspects, firstly, electron donating and withdrawing effects appeared to diminish the antioxidant
activity of the 4-substituted-1,4-dihydropyridine compounds. Secondly, compared with NAD(P)H,
4-substituted-1,4-dihydropyridines may show a further stereospecific blockade at the 4 position which
presents a poor catalytic performance.
In general, all three compounds designed in this study were able to effectively scavenge
radiation-induced ROS in mitochondria, and help to maintain normal mitochondrial function and
protect cells from oxidative stress. Most importantly, all three compounds could effectively protect
DNA against radiation-induced break. In all experiments, Mito-DHP1 was markedly more effective
than Mito-DHP2 and Mito-DHP3.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2233
6 of 10
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Chemistry
Target compounds
1–
3
were synthesized as shown in Scheme 1. In a similar procedure to that
reported previously in the literature [52], commercially available NH4HCO3,
4
, ethyl 3-oxobutanoate,
c were condensed in ethanol to form the key intermediate 1,4-dihydropyridines,
c, which was then hydrolyzed under basic condition to give acid a– c. Compound a–
, which was synthesized from
5
7
, and aldehydes,
a–
6a–6
7
8
8
8
8c
was reacted with (3-hydroxypropyl) triphenylphosphonium,
9
triphenylphosphine, 10, and 3-bromopropan-1-ol, 11, (Scheme 2), to give the final target compounds
1–3, respectively named Mito-DHP1, Mito-DHP2, Mito-DHP3 (Figure 5).
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (
CH3OH, 1 M HCl, 80 C, 6 h; (c) EDCI, HOBT, Et3N, CH2Cl2, room temperature, overnight.
a
) CH3CH2OH, 80 ◦C, under nitrogen, overnight; (
b
) NaOH,
◦
◦
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) DMF, 100 C, overnight.
Figure 5. Representative targeted compounds.
4.2. Biological Evaluation
Cell culture and radiation—the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 and HeLa cell line was cultured
at 37 ◦C under a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s High Glucose Modified Eagles
Medium (DMEM/HIGH GLUCOSE; HyClone, Logan, UT, USA), supplemented with penicillin
(100 units/mL), streptomycin (100 mg/mL; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and 10% fetal bovine serum

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2233
7 of 10
(Gibco). Cells were grown in 6- or 96-well culture plates with 4
incubated overnight. Before irradiation, the culture medium was replaced by fresh medium with
×
103 and 1
×
105 cells per well and
Mito-DHPs (1 µM), and kept incubating for 30 min. Cell irradiation was performed at the Institute of
Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, with a Cs137
of 0.98 Gy/min, 3 Gy for final dose.
γ
-radiation source at a power
M Mito-DHPs
Intracellular accumulation of Mito-DHPs: CHO-K1 cells were incubated with 10
µ
at 3◦7 ◦C for 1 h. Culture medium was then removed from the 6-well culture plates, and pre-warmed
◦
(37 C) Mitotracker Red (20 nM) staining solution was added. Cells were incubated for 20 min at 37 C.
◦
After staining, all wells were washed three times with fresh pre-warmed PBS (37 C). Mito-DHPs
accumulations in cells were visualized using a Leica confocal microscope.
ROS detection: CHO-K1 and HeLa cells were incubated with 1 mL of 5
µM 2,7-
dichlordihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) for 20 min at 37 ◦C, 24 h post radiation. Cells were
washed three times with PBS, and the fluorescence intensity was measured at 488 nm with an Infinite
F200 multimode plate reader or a flow cytometry.
Detection of
γ
-H2AX: Histone H2AX (
γ
-H2AX) was used to monitor DNA double strand breaks
◦
(DSBs) and was calculated by immunofluorescent foci. CHO cells were incubated at 37 C for 1 h
after radiation, and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, washed with PBS, and treated
with 0.2% Triton-X 100 for 15 min. After PBS washing, cells were blocked with 10% goat serum for
1 h, and incubated with rabbit polyclonal
γ
-H2AX (ph◦ospho S139) primary antibody (dilution 1:1000;
cat. no. ab2893; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) at 4 C overnight. Washing the primary antibody
three washes with PBS, cells were incubated with goat anti-rabbit fluorescent secondary antibody
(dilution 1:2000; cat. no. ab6939; Abcam). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (cat. no. C0065,
Solarbio, Beijing, China). Images of cells were obtained using an AMG EVOS fluorescence microscope.
Image Pro Plus 6.0 software was used to count foci in each pictures.
Comet assay: After radiation, cells were mixed with 70% low-melting-point agarose (0.6%) and
placed on microscope slides covered with agarose (0.8%). Slides were submerged in freshly prepared
cold lysis buffer containing 2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM Na2EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 10% DMSO, and 1% Triton
X-100 for 2.5 h. Slides were then immersed in a horizontal gel electrophoresis unit filled with cold
electrophoresis buffer containing 1 mM Na2EDTA and 300 mM NaOH for 30 min. Electrophoresis was
conducted at 30 V for 20 min. Slides were neutralized after electrophoresis with Tris-HCl (pH = 7)
and stained with ethidium bromide (2 µg/mL). Slides were examined using a Nikon fluorescence
microscope and DNA damage was estimated using the Comet Assay Software Project (CASP).
Supplementary Materials: Supplementary materials can be found at www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/18/11/2233/s1.
Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant
No. 81273005); the Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission (grant No. 14JCZDJC36400);
and the IRM-CAMS Research Fund (grant No. 1528); CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS,
2017-I2M-3-019).
Author Contributions: Fujun Yang and Wenqing Xu conceived of and designed the experiments; Yurui Zhang,
Junying Wang, and Yuanyuan Li carried out the experiments, analyzed the data, interpreted the results,
and prepared the manuscript; Feng Wang contributed to data collection and interpretation; Junying Wang
and Feng Wang contributed to data analysis and manuscript preparation; Yurui Zhang and Wenqing Xu helped
perform the analysis with constructive discussions.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Chetty, I.J.; Martel, M.K.; Jaffray, D.A.; Benedict, S.H.; Hahn, S.M.; Berbeco, R.; Deye, J.; Jeraj, R.; Kavanagh, B.;
Krishnan, S.; et al. Technology for innovation in radiation oncology. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2015, 93,
485–492. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Kilciksiz, S.; Demirel, C.; Erdal, N.; Gurgul, S.; Tamer, L.; Ayaz, L.; Ors, Y. The effect of N-acetylcysteine on
biomarkers for radiation-induced oxidative damage in a rat model. Acta Med. Okayama 2008, 62, 403–409.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2233
8 of 10
3.
4.
5.
Patt, H.M.; Tyree, E.B.; Straube, R.L.; Smith, D.E. Cysteine protection against X irradiation. Science 1949, 110,
213–214. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bacq, Z.M. The amines and particularly cysteamine as protectors against roentgen rays. Acta Radiol. 1954, 41,
47–55. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kanimozhi, P.; Prasad, N.R. Antioxidant potential of sesamol and its role on radiation-induced DNA damage
in whole-body irradiated Swiss albino mice. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2009, 28, 192–197. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
6.
Hensley, M.L.; Hagerty, K.L.; Kewalramani, T.; Green, D.M.; Meropol, N.J.; Wasserman, T.H.; Cohen, G.I.;
Emami, B.; Gradishar, W.J.; Mitchell, R.B.; et al. American society of clinical oncology 2008 clinical practice
guideline update: Use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy protectants. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 127–145.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.
8.
9.
Lombaert, I.M.; Brunsting, J.F.; Wierenga, P.K.; Kampinga, H.H.; de Haan, G.; Coppes, R.P. Keratinocyte
growth factor prevents radiation damage to salivary glands by expansion of the stem/progenitor pool.
Stem Cells 2008, 26, 2595–2601. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hirayama, R.; Ito, A.; Tomita, M.; Tsukada, T.; Yatagai, F.; Noguchi, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; Kase, Y.; Ando, K.;
Okayasu, R.; et al. Contributions of direct and indirect actions in cell killing by high-LET radiations. Radiat. Res.
2009, 171, 212–218. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kam, W.W.; Banati, R.B. Effects of ionizing radiation on mitochondria. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 65, 607–619.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Smith, R.A.; Hartley, R.C.; Cocheme, H.M.; Murphy, M.P. Mitochondrial pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
2012, 33, 341–352. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Smith, R.A.; Hartley, R.C.; Murphy, M.P. Mitochondria-targeted small molecule therapeutics and probes.
Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 15, 3021–3038. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Turrens, J.F. Mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species. J. Physiol. 2003, 552, 335–344. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
13. Raha, S.; Robinson, B.H. Mitochondria, oxygen free radicals, disease and ageing. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2000
25, 502–508. [CrossRef]
,
14. Velena, A.; Zarkovic, N.; Troselj, K.G.; Bisenieks, E.; Krauze, A.; Poikans, J.; Duburs, G. 1,4-dihydropyridine
derivatives: Dihydronicotinamide analogues-model compounds targeting oxidative stress. Oxid. Med.
Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 1892412. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Mitchell, J.B.; Russo, A.; Kuppusamy, P.; Krishna, M.C. Radiation, radicals, and images. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
2000, 899, 28–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Yamamori, T.; Yasui, H.; Yamazumi, M.; Wada, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Nakamura, H.; Inanami, O. Ionizing
radiation induces mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production accompanied by upregulation of
mitochondrial electron transport chain function and mitochondrial content under control of the cell
cycle checkpoint. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 260–270. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Leach, J.K.; van Tuyle, G.; Lin, P.S.; Schmidt-Ullrich, R.; Mikkelsen, R.B. Ionizing radiation-induced,
mitochondria-dependent generation of reactive oxygen/nitrogen. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 3894–3901. [PubMed]
18. Landauer, M.R.; Davis, H.D.; Dominitz, J.A.; Weiss, J.F. Dose and time relationships of the radioprotector
WR-2721 on locomotor activity in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1987, 27, 573–576. [CrossRef]
19. Wedemeyer, N.; Greve, B.; Uthe, D.; Potter, T.; Denklau, D.; Severin, E.; Hacker-Klom, U.; Kohnlein, W.;
Gohde, W. Frequency of CD59 mutations induced in human-hamster hybrid AL cells by low-dose X-irradiation.
Mutat. Res. 2001, 473, 73–84. [CrossRef]
20. Liu, X.; Yu, H.; Zhao, X.; Huang, X.R. Molecular simulations study of novel 1,4-dihydropyridines derivatives
with a high selectivity for Cav3.1 calcium channel. Protein Sci. 2015, 24, 1737–1747. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. Jiang, J.; Stoyanovsky, D.A.; Belikova, N.A.; Tyurina, Y.Y.; Zhao, Q.; Tungekar, M.A.; Kapralova, V.; Huang, Z.;
Mintz, A.H.; Greenberger, J.S.; et al. A mitochondria-targeted triphenylphosphonium-conjugated nitroxide
functions as a radioprotector/mitigator. Radiat. Res. 2009, 172, 706–717. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Ehrenberg, B.; Montana, V.; Wei, M.D.; Wuskell, J.P.; Loew, L.M. Membrane potential can be determined in
individual cells from the nernstian distribution of cationic dyes. Biophys. J. 1988, 53, 785–794. [CrossRef]
23. Dickinson, B.C.; Chang, C.J. A targetable fluorescent probe for imaging hydrogen peroxide in the
mitochondria of living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9638–9639. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2233
9 of 10
24. Pilch, D.R.; Sedelnikova, O.A.; Redon, C.; Celeste, A.; Nussenzweig, A.; Bonner, W.M. Characteristics of
-H2AX foci at DNA double-strand breaks sites. Biochim. Biol. Cell. 2003, 81, 123–129. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Kinner, A.; Wu, W.; Staudt, C.; Iliakis, G. -H2AX in recognition and signaling of DNA double-strand breaks
γ
γ
in the context of chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 5678–5694. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Sowmithra, K.; Shetty, N.J.; Jha, S.K.; Chaubey, R.C. Evaluation of genotoxicity of the acute
γ radiation on
earthworm Eisenia fetida using single cell gel electrophoresis technique (Comet Assay). Mutat. Res. 2015, 794,
52–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. Kim, J.H.; Jenrow, K.A.; Brown, S.L. Mechanisms of radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity and implications
for future clinical trials. Radiat. Oncol. 2014, 32, 103–115. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Valko, M.; Rhodes, C.J.; Moncol, J.; Izakovic, M.; Mazur, M. Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative
stress-induced cancer. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2006, 160, 1–40. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Matsumoto, K.; Ueno, M.; Nakanishi, I.; Anzai, K. Density of hydroxyl radicals generated in an aqueous
solution by irradiating carbon-ion beam. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2015, 63, 195–199. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Saenko, Y.; Cieslar-Pobuda, A.; Skonieczna, M.; Rzeszowska-Wolny, J. Changes of reactive oxygen and
nitrogen species and mitochondrial functioning in human K562 and Hl60 cells exposed to ionizing radiation.
Radiat. Res. 2013, 180, 360–366. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Scialo, F.; Sriram, A.; Fernandez-Ayala, D.; Gubina, N.; Lohmus, M.; Nelson, G.; Logan, A.; Cooper, H.M.;
Navas, P.; Enriquez, J.A.; et al. Mitochondrial ROS produced via reverse electron transport extend
animal lifespan. Cell. Metab. 2016, 23, 725–734. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Murphy, M.P. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem. J. 2009, 417, 1–13. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
33. Desagher, S.; Martinou, J.C. Mitochondria as the central control point of apoptosis. Trends Cell Biol. 2000, 10,
369–377. [CrossRef]
34. Ande, S.R.; Chen, J.; Maddika, S. The ubiquitin pathway: An emerging drug target in cancer therapy.
Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 625, 199–205. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Gogvadze, V.; Robertson, J.D.; Zhivotovsky, B.; Orrenius, S. Cytochrome c release occurs via Ca2+-dependent
and Ca2+-independent mechanisms that are regulated by Bax. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 19066–19071.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Ross, M.F.; Da Ros, T.; Blaikie, F.H.; Prime, T.A.; Porteous, C.M.; Severina, I.I.; Skulachev, V.P.; Kjaergaard, H.G.;
Smith, R.A.; Murphy, M.P. Accumulation of lipophilic dications by mitochondria and cells. Biochem. J. 2006
,
400, 199–208. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Zhang, H.H.; Liu, Q.; Feng, K.; Chen, B.; Tung, C.H.; Wu, L.Z. Facile photoreduction of graphene oxide by an
NAD(P)H model: Hantzsch 1,4-dihydropyridine. Langmuir 2012, 28, 8224–8229. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Ogle, J.; Stradins, J.; Baumane, L. Formation and decay of free cation-radicals in the course of electro-oxidation
of 1,2- and 1,4-dihydropyridines (Hantzsch esters). Electrochim. Acta 1994, 39, 73–79. [CrossRef]
39. Schon, E.A.; DiMauro, S.; Hirano, M. Human mitochondrial DNA: Roles of inherited and somatic mutations.
Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 878–890. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40. Patti, M.E.; Corvera, S. The role of mitochondria in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Endocr. Rev. 2010, 31,
364–395. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
41. Wallace, D.C. Mitochondria and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 685–698. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Piaceri, I.; Rinnoci, V.; Bagnoli, S.; Failli, Y.; Sorbi, S. Mitochondria and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurol. Sci.
2012, 322, 31–34. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Hill, B.G. Recent advances in mitochondrial research. Circ. Res. 2013, 113, e107–e110. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Demiral, A.N.; Yerebakan, O.; Simsir, V.; Alpsoy, E. Amifostine-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis during
radiotherapy: A case report. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002, 32, 477–479. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Wang, L.; Kuwahara, Y.; Li, L.; Baba, T.; Shin, R.W.; Ohkubo, Y.; Ono, K.; Fukumoto, M. Analysis of common
deletion (CD) and a novel deletion of mitochondrial DNA induced by ionizing radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol.
2007, 83, 433–442. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Ryan, S.V.; Carrithers, S.L.; Parkinson, S.J.; Skurk, C.; Nuss, C.; Pooler, P.M.; Owen, C.S.; Lefer, A.M.;
Waldman, S.A. Hypotensive mechanisms of amifostine. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1996, 36, 365–373. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
47. Singh, R.; Winn, L.M. The effects of 1,4-benzoquinone on c-Myb and topoisomerase II in K-562 cells.
Mutat. Res. 2008, 645, 33–38. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2233
10 of 10
48. Xie, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Guliaev, A.B.; Shen, H.; Hang, B.; Singer, B.; Wang, Z. The p-benzoquinone DNA adducts
derived from benzene are highly mutagenic. DNA Repair 2005, 4, 1399–1409. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49. Whysner, J.; Reddy, M.V.; Ross, P.M.; Mohan, M.; Lax, E.A. Genotoxicity of benzene and its metabolites.
Mutat. Res. 2004, 566, 99–130. [CrossRef]
50. Forni, L.G.; Willson, R.L. Thiyl and phenoxyl free radicals and NADH Direct observation of one-
electron oxidation. Biochem. J. 1986, 240, 897–903. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51. Velena, A.; Zilbers, J.; Duburs, G. Derivatives of 1,4-dihydropyridines as modulators of ascorbate-induced
lipid peroxidation and high-amplitude swelling of mitochondria, caused by ascorbate, sodium linoleate and
sodium pyrophosphate. Cell Biochem. Funct. 1999, 17, 237–252. [CrossRef]
52. Zhang, J. Synthesis and antioxidant activity of a series of novel 3-chalcone-substituted 1,4-dihydropyridine
derivatives. Pharm. Chem. J. 2012, 18, 120–124. [CrossRef]
©
2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).