6020
M. E. Briggs et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 6017–6020
8. Typical experimental procedures: Lauroyl peroxide (DLP;
36 mg, 5 mol %) was added to a refluxing degassed solution
of diene 4 (0.35 g, 1.82 mmol) and xanthate 9a (1.79 g,
10.1 mmol, 5.5 equiv) in 1,2-dichloroethane (19 mL). Addi-
tional DLP (22 mg, 3 mol %) was added every 2 h to the
refluxing solution until no starting material was observed
by TLC. After cooling to rt, the solvent was removed in
vacuo to give a crude oil, which was purified using column
chromatography (diethyl ether–petroleum ether 1:9–2:8) to
afford the bicycle 10a (0.49 g, 73%) as a colourless oil.
A solution of the xanthate 10a (0.49 g, 1.32 mmol) in
toluene (13.2 mL) was heated at reflux for 30 min under a
nitrogen atmosphere. Tributyltin hydride (0.52 mL,
1.96 mmol) was added and heating was continued for a
further 1.5 h. AIBN (24 mg) was added and the reaction
was heated at reflux for a further 2 h before cooling to rt.
The solvent was removed in vacuo, the residue was
redissolved in MeCN and washed with pentane. The
MeCN was removed in vacuo and the crude oil purified
by column chromatography (diethyl ether–petroleum ether
2:8) to afford the reduced product (0.25 g, 76%) as a
colourless oil.
In summary, these preliminary model studies demon-
strate the feasibility and flexibility of this strategy for the
synthesis of polycyclic structures.8 Various combina-
tions of rings can be constructed by modifying both the
xanthate and the dienone, as well as the conditions for
the ionic cyclisation step. Last but not least, the ste-
reochemistry follows ultimately from that of the initial
allylic alcohol since the stereochemical information is
conserved in the powerful Claisen rearrangement. This
approach to polycyclic compounds is currently being
applied to natural product synthesis.
Acknowledgements
We thank Ecole Polytechnique for a grant (M.E.B.) and
Rhodia for generous financial support.
References and notes
A solution of the dione (0.25 g, 1.0 mmol) in THF (10 mL)
1. Dickhaut, J.; Giese, B.; Gobel, T.; Kopping, B.; Kulicke,
K. J.; Thoma, G.; Tranch, F. Org. React. 1996, 48, 301–
856.
2. Zard, S. Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 672–685;
Zard, S. Z. In Radicals in Organic Synthesis; Renaud, P.,
Sibi, M. P., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001; Vol. 1, pp
90–108; Quiclet-Sire, B.; Zard, S. Z. Phosphorus, Sulfur
Silicon 1999, 153–154, 137–154.
and 2 M KOH
After cooling to rt, 1 M HCl
(2.0 mL) was heated at reflux for 18 h.
(10 mL) was added and the
ðaqÞ
ðaqÞ
mixture was stirred for a further 5 min before the solution
was extracted with Et2O. The combined organic extracts
were washed with brine, dried (MgSO4) and the solvent
removed in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by
column chromatography (diethyl ether–petroleum ether
2:8) to afford the enone 11a (0.141 g, 61%, dr 4:1) as a
colourless solid. Recrystallisation from petroleum ether
3. Boivin, J.; Fouquet, E.; Zard, S. Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990,
31, 85–88.
1
afforded colourless needles (dr 10:1). H NMR (400 MHz,
4. Rhoads, S. J.; Raulins, N. R. Org. React. 1975, 22, 1–252.
5. Barton, D. H. R.; George, M. V.; Tomoeda, M. J. Chem.
Soc. 1962, 1967–1974; Delduc, P.; Tailhan, C.; Zard, S. Z.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1988, 308–310; Dolle, R.
E.; Gribble, A.; Wilkes, T.; Kruse, L. I.; Eggleston, D.;
Saxty, B. A.; Wells, T. N. C.; Groot, P. H. E. J. Med.
Chem. 1995, 38, 537–543; Bertrand, F.; Pevere, V.; Quiclet-
Sire, B.; Zard, S. Z. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1069–1071.
6. Singh, V.; Thomas, B.; Vedantham, P. Tetrahedron 1998,
54, 6539–6552; Mehta, G.; Srikrishna, A. Chem. Rev. 1997,
97, 671–719.
CDCl3): dH (ppm): 5.85 (1H, d, J ¼ 2 Hz, olefinic H), 2.78–
2.74 (1H, m, CH), 2.50–2.45 (2H, m), 2.34–2.32 (2H, m),
2.18–2.13 (1H, m), 1.86–1.77 (1H, tt, J ¼ 14:4 and 4 Hz),
1.59–1.48 (2H, m), 1.42–1.3 (2H, m), 1.26–1.20 (3H, m),
1.20 (3H, s, CH3), 1.01 (3H, s, CH3), 0.90 (3H, s, CH3). 13
C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): dC (ppm) 199.6 (CO), 174.5 (C
olefinic), 122.6 (CH olefinic), 49.6 (CH2), 49.1 (CH), 47.4
(CH2), 42.6 (CH), 39.1 (C), 37.1 (CH2), 34.6 (CH3), 32.1
(CH2), 30.4 (C), 28.1 (CH2), 27.7 (CH3), 26.7 (CH3), 18.7
(CH2). IR (CH2Cl2) mmax (cmꢀ1): 2917s, 1734w, 1716w,
1667s. Combustion analysis: Found C 82.4%, H 10.3%;
Required C 82.7%, H 10.4%. MS (CI) m=z (%): 233 (100%,
MH).
7. Binot, G.; Quiclet-Sire, B.; Saleh, T.; Zard, S. Z. Synlett
2003, 382–386.