Cheung et al.
alkylidene 10. Optimized conditions provided the desired
diene 11 in nearly quantitative yield.
Å molecular sieves at room temperature to generate
enone 15 in 83% yield.26
With access to the two regions of the molecule, the key
reductive coupling reaction was investigated. Metal/
ammonia reduction of enone 15 provided the desired
enolate that was examined as the nucleophilic partner
in an alkylation of our electrophilic side-chain precur-
sor.27 Unfortunately, conditions could not be identified
where the enolate 16, used either directly from the metal/
ammonia reduction or derived from the corresponding
trimethylsilyl enol ether,28 provided more than a minor
amount (i.e., 10%) of the desired alkylation product.29 The
major byproducts from these reactions were diene 11 and
the protonated enolate (eq 4). Since conditions could be
found for alkylating other electrophiles, such as iodopen-
tane (75% yield), the problem apparently resided with
facile elimination of iodide 5.
Further functionalization of diene 11 into the requisite
homoallylic iodide 5 was examined next. A hydrozircona-
tion/iodination sequence was envisioned as an attractive
single-step solution;22 however, this strategy proceeded
in unacceptably low yields in our hands. A two-step
solution to the electrophilic side chain proved more
successful. Hydroboration of the diene 11 with 9-BBN
generated homoallylic alcohol 12 in 87% yield.23 Alcohol
12 was then converted to iodide 5 in 83% yield with PPh3,
imidazole, I2, in Et2O/CH3CN (3:1) at 0 °C.24
With the precursor to cacospongionolide’s oxygenated
side chain in hand, the preparation of the Decalin portion
was investigated. An asymmetric Robinson annulation,
as optimized by Hagiwara and Uda, appeared particu-
larly well-suited for preparing this functionality.25 Com-
mercially available 2-methyl-1,3-cyclohexadienone was
treated with ethyl vinyl ketone, KOH in methanol at 65
°C to provide triketone 14 in 95% yield. Compound 14 in
the presence of D-phenylalanine and camphorsulfonic acid
in DMF with careful control over reaction temperature,
30-70 °C, 10 °C per day for 4 days, generated enone 6
in 79% yield and 93% ee. Recrystallization from Et2O/
hexanes afforded enantiomerically pure material (i.e.,
>99% ee). Effective differentiation of the carbonyls was
achieved with ethylene glycol as solvent, p-TsOH, and 4
To improve the results of the alkylation, other condi-
tions, including various alkylation partners and addi-
tives, were studied. The enolate counterion and solvent
additives were investigated to moderate the basicity of
the enolate and perhaps favor the alkylation over the
elimination. The addition of HMPA/Me2Zn to the lithium
enolate30 provided only a few percent increase in the yield
of desired product. Similarly, modification of the enolate
with copper cyanide was also not successful.31 Metal
enolates generated from Et3B,32 n-Bu2BOTf,33 Ti(On-
35
Bu)4,34 and TiCl4 yielded similar results. Basically, the
hindered nature of the enolate and the enhanced acidity
of the homoallyic iodide presented an insurmountable
problem at this point. Without the key reductive coupling
reaction, we opted to explore an alternate approach that
would generate the dihydropyran functionality after the
key coupling reaction.
(22) (a) White, J . D.; Hanselmann, R.; Wardrop, D. J . J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 1106-1107. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Bertinato, P.; Piscapio,
A. D.; Chakraborty, T. K.; Minowa, N. J . J . Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.
1993, 619-622. (c) Ragan, J . A.; Nakatsuka, M.; Smith, D. B.; Uehling,
D. E.; Schreiber, S. L. J . Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 4267-4268. (d) Negishi,
E.; Takahashi, T. Aldirchim. Acta 1985, 2 (18), 31-47. (e) Bertelo, C.
A.; Schwartz, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 262-264. (f) Hart, D.
W.; Schwartz, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 8115-8116. (g) Schwartz,
J .; Labinger, J . A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1976, 15, 333-339.
For a recent review, see (h) Wipf, P.; J ahn, H. Tetrahedron 1996, 52,
12853-12910. (i) Wipf, P.; Kendall, C. Chem.sEur. J . 2002, 8, 1778-
1784. (j) Wipf, P.; Takahashi, H.; Nian, Z. Pure Appl. Chem. 1998, 70,
1077-1082. (k) Wipf, P.; Xu, W.; Takahashi, H.; J ahn, H.; Coish, P.
D. G. Pure Appl. Chem. 1997, 69, 639-644.
(23) (a) Chambers, M. S.; Thomas, E. J . J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1997, 4, 417-431. (b) Kranz, M.; Kessler, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 5359-5362. (c) Amoo, V. E.; Bernardo, De S.; Weigele, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 2401-2404.
(24) (a) Theodorakis, E. A.; Drouet, K. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 456-457. (b) Tse, B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7094-7100.
(c) Li, J .; Lan, J .; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996,
7, 2851-2862.
(25) (a) Hagiwara, H.; Uda, H. J . Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 2308-2311.
(b) Hajos, Z. G.; Parrish, D. R. J . Org. Chem. 1974, 12, 1615-1621. (c)
Eder, U.; Sauer, G.; Wiechert, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1971,
10, 496-497. (d) Danishefsky, S.; Cain, P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1976,
98, 4975-4983. (e) Hiroi, K.; Yamada, S. I. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1975,
23, 1103-1109. (f) Brown, K. L.; Damm, L.; Dunitz, J . D.; Eschenmoser,
A.; Hobi, R.; Kratky, C. Helv. Chim. Acta 1978, 61, 3108-3135. (g)
Agami, C.; Meynier, F.; Puchot, C.; Guilhem, J .; Pascard, C. Tetrahe-
dron 1984, 40, 1031-1038. (h) Agami, C.; Puchot, C.; Sevestre, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 1501-1504. (i) Puchot, C.; Samuel, O.;
Dunach, E.; Zhao, S.; Agami, C.; Kagan, H. B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,
108, 2353-2357. (j) Agami, C.; Puchot, C. J . Mol. Catal. 1986, 38, 341-
343. (k) Agami, C. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1987, 3, 499-507. (l) Hoang,
L.; Bahnmanyar, S.; Houk, K. N.; List, B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 16-17.
Alter n a tive Retr osyn th esis of Ca cosp on gion olid e
B. The failure of the key fragment coupling reaction
(26) Ciceri, P.; Demnitz, F. W. J . Tetrahedron 1997, 38, 389-390.
(27) For related alkylations, see (a) Ruggeri, R. B.; Hansen, M. M.;
Heathcock, C. H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 8734-8736. (b) Larsen,
S. D.; Monti, S. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 8015-8020. (c) Corey,
E. J .; Hartmann, R.; Vatakencherry, P. A. 1962, 84, 2611-2614.
(28) (a) House, H. O.; Czuba, L. J .; Gall, M.; Olmstead, H. D. J . Org.
Chem. 1969, 34, 2324-2336. (b) Stork, G.; Hudrlik, P. F. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1968, 90, 4462-4464. (c) Stork, G.; Hudrlik, P. F. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1968, 90, 4464-4465. (d) Snitman, D. L.; Tsai, M.-Y.; Watt, D.
S.; Edwards, C. L.; Stotter, P. L. J . Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 2838-2842.
(e) Smith, A. B., III; Mewshaw, R. J . Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 3685-3689.
(29) Smith and Mewshaw observed no alkylation of similar lithium
enolate with trans-1-iodo-3-pentene: Smith, A. B., III; Mewshaw, R.
J . Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 3685-3689.
(30) Morita, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Noyori, R. J . Org. Chem. 1989, 54,
1785-1787.
(31) Posner, G. H.; Lentz, C. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 934-
946.
(32) Rathke, M. W.; Lindert, A. Synthetic Commun. 1978, 8, 9-14.
(33) Evans, D. A.; Nelson, J . V.; Vogel, E.; Taber, T. R. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1981, 103, 3099-3111.
(34) Yachi, K.; Shinokubo, H.; Oshima, K. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 9465-9466.
(35) Mukaiyama, T.; Banno, K.; Narasaka, K. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1974, 96 (6), 7503-7509.
5714 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 69, No. 17, 2004