COMMUNICATIONS
Nerea Alonso et al.
Experimental Section
General Flow Procedure for Zinc Insertion and
Negishi Cross-Coupling
A solution of alkyl halide 0.3M in dry THF (when required
1 equiv. of LiCl was added as additive) was passed through
a 10 mm internal diameter Omni-fit column containing Zn
(12 g) using the R2+R4 system[7] at the desired temperature
and a flow rate of 0.2 mLminÀ1 (tR =10 min). The outlet so-
lution was mixed in a T piece with a solution of haloarene
0.2M in dry THF at 0.2 mLminÀ1 and passed through
a 6.6 mm internal diameter Omni-fit column containing Sil-
iacat DPP-Pd (1 g) at the required temperature (tR =
2.5 min). The crude of the reaction was quenched with a sa-
turated solution of ammonium chloride and extracted with
AcOEt. The organic layer was separated, dried (Na2SO4),
filtered and the solvents evaporated under vacuum. The
crude products were purified by column chromatography
using silica to yield the desired products.
Figure 3. Long-term stability assessment.
consumed. This volume is very practical on the labo-
ratory scale as most organometallic reagents are sold
in 100 mL volumes. These data suggest that use of the
zinc column to produce organozinc halides will be
broadly applicable to reactions beyond the Negishi re-
action.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank NSF (CHE-1152020), Chemring, Inc.,
Prof. Frank Gupton for helping the contact. Prof. Antonio de
la Hoz, Prof. Angel Diaz Ortiz, Prof. Wim de Borggraeve
and Dr. Brecht Egle for their help in the Negishi protocol. D.
Miguel A. PeÇa PiÇon and Dr. Alberto NuÇez OcaÇa for
their help in the large scale preparation of organozinc com-
pounds. Duncan Guthrie, Chris Butters, David Griffin,
Adrian Clarkson, and Lillian Auchincloss from Vapourtec
Ltd. are thanked for their assistance throughout this project.
The second aspect of scale examined was overall
protocol stability with respect to the two column
system. In this case, we measured the formation of
Negishi product as a function of time (Figure 3). The
reaction was performed such that 3.3 mmolhÀ1 was
achieved. The calculated turnover number of the cata-
lyst for the overall process was 175. The isolated yield
of the reaction was 94% and the reaction was stable
over the 13 h that we monitored. These data demon-
strate that this approach is valid on development
scales. We perceive that with larger zinc and catalyst
columns the reaction could be scaled to manufactur-
ing volumes.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that organo-
zinc halides can be produced from shelf-stable halides
and used in situ in a continuous packed-bed approach.
The data shown in Figure 2 demonstrate that high
and reproducible titers can be realized when the zinc
is appropriately activated. The scope data indicate
that a variety of substrate types are readily converted
into organozinc halides and that coupling the forma-
tion of the zinc species with a Negishi reaction is
a productive approach. The two column system is tol-
erant of many functional groups including those of in-
terest from a medicinal chemistry perspective (hetero-
cycles such as azetidine 1d). The formation of organo-
zinc halides is broadly useful as the approach can sup-
port the formation of 150 mL of 0.5M reagent. Final-
ly, the two stage zinc insertion/Negishi reaction
functions at the high end of laboratory scale with ease
suggesting that the approach is stable and robust
enough to support much larger scale chemistry. Fur-
ther expansion of both zinc insertion and coupling
steps will be the topic of future endeavors.
References
[1] Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions, 2nd edn.,
(Eds.: A. de Meijere, F. Diederich), Wiley-VCH, Wein-
heim, 2004.
[2] a) T. Tsukamoto, ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 369–
370; b) W. P. Walters, J. Green, J. R. Weiss, M. A. J.
Murcko, Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 6405–6416.
[3] a) P. Knochel, R. D. Singer, Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2117–
2188; b) P. Knochel, J. J. A. Perea, P. Jones, Tetrahedron
1998, 54, 8275–8319; c) P. Knochel, M. A. Schade, S.
Bernhardt, G. Manolikakes, A. Metzger, F. M. Piller,
C. J. Rohbogner, M. Mosrin, Beilstein J. Org. Chem.
2011, 7, 1261–1277.
[4] For other examples of tandem flow reactions inspiring
this effort see: a) H. Usutani, Y. Tomida, A. Nagaki, H.
Okamoto, T. Nokami, J. Yoshida, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 3046–3047; b) D. Webb, T. F. Jamison, Org.
Lett. 2012, 14, 568–571.
[5] a) Microreactors: New Technology for Modern Chemis-
try, (Eds.: W. Ehrfield, V. Hessel, H. Lçwe), Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, 2000; b) C. Wiles, P. Watts, Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2008, 1655–1671; c) T. Illg, P. Lçb, V.
Hessel, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 3707–3719; d) P.
Watts, S. J. Haswell, Drug Discovery Today 2003, 8,
586–593; e) Microreactors in Organic Synthesis and
4
ꢃ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Adv. Synth. Catal. 0000, 000, 0 – 0
ÝÝ
These are not the final page numbers!