Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
results suggest that the current reaction might start from in situ
reduction of the Rh(III) complex to generate Rh(I) species,
and the following steps also involve the photoinduced
reduction process facilitated by the base that coordinates to
the diboron reagent.
Scheme 3. Experimental Mechanistic Studies and Plausible
Reaction Mechanisms
Based on the experimental mechanistic studies, plausible
reaction mechanisms are shown in Scheme 3c. First, as shown
in the top scheme, Rh(III) di-tert-butoxide D, generated from
[CpA3RhCl2]2 and NaOtBu, is slowly reduced by borate
complex E to give active Rh(I) complex F along with a
boronate ester [tBuO−B(pin)]. In the presence of a photo-
catalyst [Ir(III)], rapid oxidation of borate complex E with the
triplet state of the photocatalyst [Ir(III)*] results in the
generation of the anionic reductive state of the photocatalyst
[Ir(II)−], which instead reduced Rh(III) complex D to Rh(I)
complex F. Then, as shown in the bottom scheme, the
subsequent oxidative addition (OA, step I) of Rh(I) to the
ortho-C−H bond of an arene affords aryl Rh(III) hydride G.
Although the direct ligand exchange from G with diboron is
difficult, photoexcitation of G generates triplet state 3G* that is
more subject to the second reduction giving Rh(II) ate
complex H (SET, step II-A). A facile ligand exchange (LE,
step II-B) between electron-rich H and electron-deficient
diboron forms the Rh−B bond. Subsequent oxidation with the
photocatalyst affords Rh(III) boryl complex I. Finally,
reductive elimination (RE, step III) affords the desired
borylated product and regenerates Rh(I) complex F.
To gain detailed insight into the proposed mechanisms,
model calculations using 1c, bis(ethyleneglycolato)diboron
[B2(eg)2], and CpA3Rh(I) or CpA3Rh(III)(OMe)2 complexes
were performed. First, the initial reductive process of Rh(III)
to Rh(I) species was evaluated in Figure 2a. Both of the two
oxidations of borate complex INT-X to unstable boryl radical
species (INT-Y) are endothermic, but they are compensated
by a large energy release for the reformation of 1 equiv of
diboron [B2(eg)2]. On the other hand, this process is
dramatically changed to an exothermic process by employing
an iridium photocatalyst. These results clearly support that the
present reaction proceeds even with a single rhodium catalyst
but is accelerated by an iridium cocatalyst.
The calculated pathways from generated Rh(I) species
depicted in Figure 2b show that oxidative addition from
CpA3Rh(I) (step I, INT1 to INT2) and reductive elimination
from ArCpA3Rh(III)B(eg) (step III, INT5 to INT6) smoothly
proceed (ΔG‡ < 10 kcal mol−1). On the other hand, the CMD
process with CpA3Rh(III)(OMe)2 (step I’, INT1′ to INT2′) is
kinetically unfavored (ΔG‡ = 32.2 kcal mol−1) and thus
excluded from the plausible pathway.47,48 In addition, the
interconversion from INT2 to INT3′ is also excluded because
the release of unstable NaH with a large endothermic energy
(35.6 kcal mol−1) is required. In the CpA3Rh(I)/(III) catalytic
cycle, the rate-limiting step is the ligand exchange (step II,
INT3 to INT4), in which the highest activation energy (40.3
kcal mol−1) is required. In contrast, the blue-light induced
Rh(III) catalyst (with or without the Ir photocatalyst) shut
down the reaction. The base is also essential; no reaction was
observed in the absence of NaOtBu with or without Rh(III)
catalyst. In addition, the present borylation was inhibited by a
single electron transfer (SET) inhibitor [nitrobenzene (15)], a
radical oxidant [(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxy (16)],
and oxygen (under air), whereas a radical scavenger [9,10-
dihydroanthracene (17)] was able to coexist. These results
indicate that this reaction does not involve any free radical
species but a reduction process through a single electron
transfer. Since the optimum base (NaOtBu) used in the
present borylation does not promote the CMD pathway,47,48
Rh(III)-catalyzed C−H activation can be excluded. To identify
the possibility of C−H activation with Rh(I) species generated
by in situ reduction of the initial Rh(III) complex in the
presence of possible reducing agents (photocatalyst and/or
diboron), we synthesized Rh(I) complex 18 and examined its
catalytic activity. We found that 18 can catalyze the borylation
(39% yield of 3a) only under blue-light irradiation (Scheme
3b). In addition, the present reaction hardly proceeds in the
absence of NaOtBu with or without the Ir photocatalyst. These
3
excitation of INT2 followed by ISC leads to a triplet INT2*
(Figure 2c). This excitation might also be accelerated with an
excited iridium photocatalyst via the triplet energy transfer
from 3Ir(III) to INT2 [Rh(III)] (ΔG = −19.7 kcal mol−1). In
the excited triplet state, a single electron transfer from the
iridium photocatalyst or borate complex INT-X proceed with a
large energy release (−43.2 or −3.5 kcal mol−1, respectively) to
in situ generate Rh(II) ate complex INT2-Rh(II), which is
preferred to the endothermic direct ligand exchange (3INT2*
11328
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 11325−11331