6-cyclohexadecenone (8b) in comparable yield. As expected
from general ring strain effects in medium ring systems the
eight-membered substrate 7c was reluctant to react in this
manner. However, at more elevated temperatures (560 °C)
the 11-membered product 8c was obtained in 30% yield.
The scope was further explored with methyl-substituted
substrates 7d-g, as they would provide enones 8d-g,
representing new compounds of possible value in fragrance
chemistry. The key step for the preparation of the precursors
7d-f includes the regioselective cyclopropanation of the
exocyclic allylic double bond in dienols 9d-f (Scheme 3).
Scheme 4
Scheme 3
of the substrates 7a-g underwent E/Z isomerization during
the short thermal impact.
According to Scheme 4 the TMS-protecting group proved
to be crucial. As exemplified with cyclopropyl alcohol 10,
prolysis under comparable conditions produced three iso-
meric compounds. The major component turned out to be
ring-opened cyclopropyl ketone 11 (65%), the product of a
retro-ene fragmentation, instead of the ring expansion product
5 (5%). In addition, we found a 5,12 fused bicyclic ketone
12 (10%).19 A reasonable explanation for the formation of
the latter involves a six-electron oxa-ene process of the Conia
type within the initially formed enol form of 5.20
In summary, we have developed a new type of three-
carbon ring expansion offering a strategically novel and
practical route to an otherwise difficult-to-achieve but
common ring system. Both the low price and the easy
accessibility of C-12 precursors allow for the synthesis of
specifically substituted C-15 macrocyclic musks. Enones
8d-g are new and reveal the typical musk odor. It is of
further synthetic significance that the FVP reactions can be
run as a continuous, solvent-free process, rendering this
procedure very promising for large-scale operations. Further
studies are in progress.
As summarized in Table 1 (entries 4-7) the desired
muscenones 8d-g were obtained in good yields. The lower
yield observed in the case of 7e with a cis-substituted
cyclopropane moiety having energetically unequal bonds may
be ascribed to competing cleavage and H-transfer reactions.15
As expected, however, the more highly substituted bond
turned out to be the main site of breakage to give 4-methyl
enone 8e.16 The same result was obtained when the trans-
analogue of 7e was submitted to FVP.17 Product 8f possess-
ing a gem-dimethyl group was obtained in the same manner
from the sterically crowded precursor 7f. Finally, we
investigated the effect of a methyl group in the 2-position.
Subjecting substrate 7g to FVP at 520 °C afforded 8g bearing
the substituent at C5.18 As observed in the case of 3, neither
(13) For related silyloxy-Cope reactions, see: (a) Thies, R. W.; Billig-
meier, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 200. (b) Thies, R. W.; Bolesta, R.
E. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 1233. (c) Thies, R. W.; Darwula, K. P. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 17, 1188. (d) Thies, R. W.; Darwula, K. P. J.
Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 3798.
(14) Although many silyloxy-Cope reactions can be found in the
literature, the involvement of a cyclopropyl moiety is unprecedented so
far. For a recent review on silyloxy-Cope rearrangements, see: Schneider,
C. Synlett 2002, 1079.
Acknowledgment. This work was generously supported
by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental condi-
tions and complete spectral data for all compounds. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at
(15) Recent examples: (a) Ru¨edi, G.; Nagel, M.; Hansen, H.-J. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 2691. (b) Ru¨edi, G.; Nagel, M.; Hansen, H.-J. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 4211. (c) Ru¨edi, G.; Nagel, M.; Hansen, H.-J. Synlett 2003, 1210.
(16) (a) Takekawa, Y.; Shishido, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6817.
(b) Takekawa, Y.; Shishido, K. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8490.
(17) At temperatures above 450 °C, both pure substrates interconverted
to give a 1:1 mixture of cis/trans isomers.
OL0487027
(19) The formation of the cis- as well as the trans-isomer of 12 would
generally be possible. Although only a single isomer had been formed, its
relative configuration could not be assigned by NOE measurements because
of overlapping H signals.
(20) (a) Conia, J. M.; Le Perchec, P. Synthesis 1975, 1. (b) Conia, J.
M.; Lange, G. L. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 564.
1
(18) The relative configuration of compound 7g was determined to be
(1R*,2R*).
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 17, 2004
2991