C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
structures do not have a planar polyene backbone and also that the
dihedral angle between the backbone and the attached phenyl ring
is significantly twisted. A defect in the backbone structure due the
nature of phenylacetylene polymerization is also suggested.16c
A
similar explanation can be applied for the unexpectedly low spin
multiplicities observed for polycarbene 3. It is interesting to note
here that the spin multiplicity of 3 is significantly higher than that
of a component spin unit, i.e., triplet carbene (S ) 1), rather than
an almost complete lack of magnetic interaction, as observed for
the poly(phenyl)acetylene bearing stable radical units. This is partly
ascribable to the higher spin density of the present system composed
of triplet carbene units than that composed of doublet radical units
and demonstrates the usefulness of triplet carbene as the spin source
for constructing high-spin organic molecules.
Acknowledgment. The authors are grateful to the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan for
support of this work through a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
for Specially Promoted Research (No. 12002007).
Supporting Information Available: Preparation, GPC, IR, NMR,
and UV/vis charts of 3-nN2, plot of magnetization vs irradiation time
in the photolysis of 3-nN2, and field dependence of the magnetization
of the photoproduct from 3-nN2 (PDF). This material is available free
Figure 1. (a) Plot of M vs H/T of the photoproduct from polydiazo
compound (3-nN2) measured at 2.0 (O) and 5.0 K (0). (b) Plot of M/Ms vs
H/T of the photoproduct from polydiazo compound (3-nN2) measured at
5.0 K (0). The red lines represent two-component theoretical curves with
S ) 9.63 (F ) 0.15) and S ) 1.94 (F ) 0.22).
References
(1) (a) Iwamura, H. AdV. Phys. Org. Chem. 1990, 26, 179. (b) Dougherty, D.
A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 88. (c) Rajca, A. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94,
871.
(2) (a) Miller, J. S., Epstein, A. J., Eds. MRS Bulletin 2000, 25, 21. (b) Miller,
J. S., Drillon, M., Eds. Magnetism: Molecules to Materials II; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001. (c) Molecular Magnetism; Itoh, K.,
Kinoshita, M., Eds.; Kodansha-Gordon and Breach: Tokyo, 2000.
(3) (a) Koga, N.; Iwamura, H. In Carbene Chemistry; Bertrand, G., Ed.; Fontis
Media: Lausanne, 2002; pp 271-296. (b) Matsuda, K.; Nakamura, N.;
Takahashi, K.; Inoue, K.; Koga, N.; Iwamura, H. Molecule-Based
Magnetic Materials; ACS Symposium Series 644; American Chemical
Society: Washington, DC, 1996; p 142.
(4) (a) Tomioka, H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 315. (b) Tomioka, H. In
AdVances in Carbene Chemistry; Brinker, U., Ed.; JAI Press: Greenwich,
CT, 1998; Vol. 2, pp 175-214. (c) Tomioka, H. In Carbene Chemistry;
Bertrand G., Ed.; Fontis Media S. A.; Lausanne, 2002; pp 103-152.
(5) Regitz, M.; Maas, G. Diazo CompoundssProperties and Synthesis;
Academic Press: Orlando, 1986.
temperatures did not fit the same Brillouin function. Since the
magnetization is attenuated at lower temperatures (compare M vs
H/T plot at 2 and 5 K in Figure 1a), the presence of antiferromag-
netic interaction among the unpaired spins is suggested. When a
sample concentration as low as 0.5 mM is taken into account, the
observed antiferromagnetic interaction can be assigned to an
intramolecular interaction rather than an intermolecular one.
Therefore, the data at 5 K where the antiferromagnetic interaction
is weaker were analyzed in terms of the Brillouin function (Figure
1b). The data were fitted with eq 1 with S ) 4.90 (F ) 0.35).
Alternatively, the data were better analyzed by a two-component
Brillouin function13 with S ) 9.63 (F ) 0.15) and S ) 1.94 (F )
0.22). Significantly small F values indicate either that the decom-
position rate of the precursor diazo functional groups is incomplete
or that there are considerable intramolecular antiferromagnetic
interactions between the carbene centers. Since the IR analysis of
the spent solution showed that most diazo groups disappeared, the
latter possibility is more likely.14
The observations suggest that a persistent triplet diphenylcarbene
unit incorporated into a π-network of the phenylacetylene polymer
in a ferromagnetic fashion indeed acts as a spin source to generate
a high-spin ground state. However, the estimated spin multiplicities
are not as high as that expected from the degree of polymerization.
It should be noted that the connectivity of carbene centers on the
pendant phenyl group through the polyene backbone is nondisjoint
in the Borden/Davidson sense,15 and hence the spins are expected
to interact ferromagnetically. The poly(phenyl)acetylenes bearing
stable radical groups have been shown to have a spin multiplicity
of 1/2, indicating that through-bond interaction was essentially not
observed.16 This is interpreted as indicating that the polyene
(6) Matsuda, K.; Nakamura, N.; Inoue, K.; Koga, N.; Iwamura, H. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1996, 69, 1483 and references therein.
(7) Tomioka, H.; Hattori, M.; Hirai, K.; Sato, K.; Shiomi, D.; Takui, T.; Itoh,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1106.
(8) (a) Itoh, T.; Hirai, K.; Tomioka, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1130.
(b) Ohtsuka, Y.; Itoh, T.; Hirai, K,; Tomioka, H.; Takui, T. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 847. (c) Maemura, T.; Ohtsuka, Y.; Wildt, H.; Hirai, K.; Tomioka,
H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 2991. (d) Itoh, T.; Jinbo, Y.; Hirai, K.;
Tomioka, H. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 4238. (e) Itoh, T.; Morisaki, F.;
Kurono, M.; Hirai. K.; Tomioka, H. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5870.
(9) Masuda, T.; Yoshimura, T.; Fujimori, J.; Higashimura, T. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1987, 1805.
(10) Kishimoto, Y.; Eckerle, P.; Miyatake, T.; Kainosho, M.; Ono, A.; Ikariya,
T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 12035 and references therein.
(11) Tomioka, H.; Watanabe, T.; Hattori, M.; Nomura, N.; Hirai, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 474.
(12) R. L. Magnetochemistry; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1986.
(13) See for instance: Rajca, A.; Wongsriratanakul, J.; Rajca, S.; Cerny, L.
Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 3144.
(14) However, rather significant experimental errors in analyzing a small
quantity (0.05 mL) of a very dilute (0.5 mM) sample should also be taken
into account.
(15) Borden, W. T.; Davidson, E. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4587.
(16) (a) Miura, Y.; Matsumoto, M.; Ushitani, Y.; Taki, Y.; Takui, T.; Itoh, K.
Macromol. 1993, 26, 6673. (b) Nishide, H.; Kaneko, T.; Igarashi, M.;
Tsuchida, E. Yoshioka, N.; Lahti, P. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 3082. (c)
Lahti, P. M.; Inceli, A. L.; Rossitto, F. C. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym.
Chem. 1997, 35, 2167.
JA0455345
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 6, 2005 1651