5266
J. M. Smallheer et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 5263–5267
Figure 1. (a) X-ray crystal structure of compound 3b (in orange) complexed with porcine fIXa (in green). Also shown are the alternate orientations of
Tyr99 from the published PPACK-fIXa (in white) and the p-aminobenzamidine-fIXa (in magenta) crystal structures. (b) Overlay of the fIXa-3b
crystal structure (in green) with the DMP-423-fXa structure (in pink).
decreased fIXa potency without adversely affecting the
fXa potency. The best combination of fIXa potency
and selectivity in this series was thus obtained with 5-
chlorobenzimidazole as the P4 substituent (3g).
Figure 1bshows the overlay of the fIXa- 3b crystal struc-
ture with the crystal structure of DMP423, a potent and
selective fXa inhibitor, complexed with fXa.10 With the
exception of the area of the 99-loop, the backbones of
the two enzymes are very similar, and the two inhibitors
bind in the active sites in essentially the same way. In
both crystal structures, Tyr99 blocks the S2 pocket
and forms the bottom of the hydrophobic S4 binding
site. The phenyl ring of the benzimidazole of 3b is in
close proximity to residues Tyr177, Asn97, and Lys98
at the base of the fIXa S4 pocket. In view of the differ-
ences in amino acid sequence in this region (i.e., the cor-
responding residues in fXa are Thr177, Glu97, and
Thr98) and the more restricted conformation of the fIXa
99-loop,8b more extensive SAR in this region may lead
to improved selectivity.
Substitution of heterocycles at the 3-position of the pyr-
azole ring to interact with Glu219 did not provide the
significant increase in potency or selectivity expected
from a strong ionic or H-bonding interaction with the
Glu side chain carboxylic acid. The tetrazole 8d and
pyridine 8e did show improved potency and selectivity
as compared to compound 1, in a similar range to sub-
stituted benzimidazoles 3h–j. Combining the 3-pyri-
dylpyrazole substitution with a 5-chlorobenzimidazole
P4 in compound 8f, however, did not result in additional
potency over that observed for either substitution alone.
The compounds in Table 2 also showed modest selectiv-
ity (5–40-fold) for fIXa over thrombin and trypsin
(unpublished results). No in vivo evaluations were car-
ried out on this series of compounds.
In conclusion, we have identified several pyrazole com-
pounds, which are potent dual inhibitors of fIXa and
fXa, and have shown that the fIXa/fXa potency ratio
can be modulated by changes to the P4 moiety as well
as in the region where these molecules might interact
with Glu219. The X-ray crystal structure of reversible
inhibitor 3b complexed with porcine fIXa provides addi-
tional structural insights, which can be used in the future
design of more potent and selective fIXa inhibitors.
The crystal structure of porcine fIXa complexed with
compound 3b is shown in Figure 1a.14 The inhibitor is
anchored into the active site by the bidentate interaction
between the benzamidine group and Asp189 of fIXa. A
hydrogen bond is observed between N2 of the pyrazole
ring and the backbone nitrogen of Gln192. The amide
carbonyl is also engaged in a hydrogen bond with the
backbone nitrogen of Gly216. The overall binding mode
of this inhibitor is quite similar to that observed with
reversible fXa inhibitors complexed in fXa10,15 in that
the inhibitor optimizes interactions in the S1 pocket
and S4 region of the protein using a linker that engages
in hydrogen bonds with backbone residues of the
enzyme. In contrast to the previously published fIXa
structures, the fIXa-3b structure shows an orientation
of the Tyr99 residue that is more consistent with the ori-
entation observed in fXa crystal structures and that
accommodates binding of the inhibitor in the S4 pocket,
such that the benzimidazole-phenyl group is situated in
the hydrophobic box surrounded by residues Trp215,
Tyr99, and Phe174.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Chong-Hwan Chang for
assistance with refinements of the final crystal structure
for publication. We also thank Mr. Eugene Amparo and
Mr. Michael Orwat for their synthetic assistance.
References and notes
1. Kaiser, B. Drugs Future 1998, 23, 423.
2. Himber, J.; Refino, C. J.; Burcklen, L.; Roux, S.;
Kirchhofer, D. Thromb. Haemost. 2001, 85, 475–481.
3. Feuerstein, G. Z.; Toomey, J. R.; Valocik, R.; Koster, P.;
Patel, A.; Blackburn, M. N. Thromb. Haemost. 1999, 82,
1443–1445.