The disordered trifluoroacetate group as well as a coor-
dinated water molecule are clearly visible from the X-ray
structure (Figure 1). The Sn-O bond lengths of 2.220 and
2.344 Å correlate well with related structures.12 In addition,
the Sn-C bond lengths range from 2.131 to 2.140 Å, which
also compares well to related compounds. The crystal
structure also implies a hydrogen-bonding network of the
water molecule to a neighboring molecules’ nitrogen atom
and another neighboring molecules’ trifluoroacetate carbonyl
oxygen.
microwave heating cycle (150 °C, 10 min) to complete the
reaction. Interestingly, the N-(trimethylsilyl)tetrazole species
that is associated with the reaction between nitriles and
alkylsilyl azide reagents was never observed; only the 1H-
tetrazole was detected, most likely due to a trace amount of
water present in the reaction.
For comparison, the reaction outlined in Scheme 2 was
also conducted under conventional thermal techniques.
Utilizing the same conditions as the microwave-assisted
reaction [i.e., 150 °C (sealed tube), 10 min, 2 cycles] we
observed similar percent conversion (90%) conventionally
as compared to the reaction when it was conducted with
microwave heating (99%). However, under refluxing condi-
tions the reaction required more than 22 h for complete
conversion. Overall, these comparisons demonstrated that
microwave heating was a more effective and convenient
method than conventional thermal techniques.
To circumvent the above-mentioned impediments, it was
clear that an alternate approach would be needed. We
envisioned that protection of the boronic acid as the pinacol
ester may help to alleviate the problem at hand. The
pinacolboronate ester was readily prepared by allowing the
boronic acid in DME to react with a slight excess of pinacol
in the presence of magnesium sulfate. Filtration of this
reaction slurry provides a solution of the boronate ester,
which could be used directly in our tetrazole formation
reactions. Indeed, when the pinacol ester 5b was subjected
to the conditions found in entry 5 of Table 1 the formation
of the tin-containing byproduct was not observed and the
percent conversion was improved to 78% (Scheme 2). After
Ten different arylnitrile boronates 5 were selected as
starting materials and utilized for the synthesis of a set of
aryltetrazole boronates. The nitrile boronates were either
commercially available or prepared from the requisite
bromide by one of the following methods: (1) metal-
halogen exchange and trapping with 2-isopropoxypinacol
borolane14 or (2) palladium-catalyzed boronation with bis-
(pinacolato)diboron.15 The crude reaction mixtures were
analyzed via HPLC with a 0.05% formic acid modifier.16
Scheme 2. Preparation of Aryltetrazole Boronatea
All of the nitrile boronates were smoothly converted to
the corresponding tetrazoles in moderate to good yields
(Table 2). However, in the case of 2-hydroxybenzonitrile,
pinacol ester 6h, it was discovered that three reaction cycles
were required for complete conversion. Although there was
no clear correlation between the aryl substituents and the
reaction outcome, the reaction did prove to tolerate a variety
of functionalities.
a Percent conversion determined by integration of an HPLC total
absorption chromatogram from 190 to 360 nm.
Product isolation was accomplished by either Florisil flash
chromatography or aqueous workup.17 Florisil chromatog-
raphy was found to be our preferred method of isolation. It
allowed the complete reaction solution to be directly loaded
further investigation, it was found that when the reaction
was subjected to a second reaction cycle greater than 99%
conversion could be obtained. In a typical experiment,13
a
(13) General Procedure. A microwave vial was charged with (3-
cyanophenyl)boronic acid, pinacol ester (344 mg, 1.5 mmol), azidotri-
methylsilane (0.40 mL, 3.0 mmol), dibutyltin oxide (37 mg, 0.15 mmol),
and DME (2.2 mL). The reaction mixture was heated to 150 °C for 10 min
in a CEM Explorer microwave. After the mixture was cooled to room
temperature, additional azidotrimethylsilane (0.40 mL, 3.0 mmol) and
dibutyltin oxide (37 mg, 0.15 mmol) were added, and the mixture was
reheated for 10 min at 150 °C. The reaction solution was loaded onto a
Florisil column (35 g) and eluted with 20% CH2Cl2/heptane f 10%
methanol/CH2Cl2 to furnish the product (3-tetrazolephenyl)boronic acid,
pinacol ester 6b (342 mg, 83%). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 8.37 (s, 1H),
8.16 (d, 1H, J ) 7.9 Hz), 7.80 (d, 1H, J ) 7.2 Hz), 7.58 (t, 1H, J ) 7.6
Hz), 1.34 (s, 12H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 156.5, 136.1, 132.6, 129.6,
128.8, 125.6, 83.9, 24.7. HRMS: m/z (M + H)+ calcd for C13H17BN4O2
273.1523, found 273.1519.
(14) Garg, N. K.; Sarpong, R.; Stoltz, B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 13179-13184.
(15) Ishiyama, T.; Murata, M.; Miyaura, N. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
7508-7510.
(16) The use of 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid as a modifier resulted in
hydrolysis of the pinacol ester functionality, during HPLC analysis.
(17) Typical Aqueous Workup. After completion of the reaction, the
solvent was removed and the residue was taken up in ether. The ether was
extracted with 2 N NaOH, and the combined aqueous layers were washed
with ether. The aqueous layer was then acidified to pH 4, and the resulting
precipitate was collected.
mixture of 2 equiv of TMSN3 and 5b in DME was irradiated
at 150 °C for 10 min in the presence of 10 mol % Bu2Sn(O).
After the addition of an additional 2 equiv of TMSN3 and
10 mol % Bu2Sn(O), the mixture was subjected to another
(9) Chaturvedi, V.; Bhal, L.; Tandon, J. P Indian J. Chem., Sect. A 1985,
24A, 1039-1041.
(10) (a) Chambers, R. F.; Scherer, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1926, 48,
1054-1062. (b) Ha¨nssgen, D.; Reuter, P.; Do¨llein, G. J. Organomet. Chem.
1986, 317, 159-165. (c) Blunden, S. J.; Hill, R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1987,
333, 317-321.
(11) (a) Alcock, N. W.; Roe, S. M. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1989,
8, 1589-1598. (b) Ali, S.; Khokhar, M. N.; Bhatti, M. H.; Mazhar, M.;
Masood, M. T.; Shahid, K.; Badshah, A. Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org.
Chem. 2002, 32, 1373-1392. (c) Gielen, M.; Dalil, H.; Mahieu, B.;
Biesemans, M.; Willem, R. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 12, 855-
859.
(12) (a) Srivastava, T. N.; Siddiqui, M. A.; Singh, J. D.; Srivastava, S.
Indian J. Chem., Sect. A 1987, 26A, 158-161. (b) Chee, C. F.; Lo, K. M.;
Ng, S. W. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E: Struct. Rep. Online 2003, E59, m205-
206. (c) Chee, C. F.; Lo, K. M.; Ng, S. W. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E:
Struct. Rep. Online 2002, E58, m661-662.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 19, 2004
3267