Letters
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2004, Vol. 47, No. 24 5835
Table 3. Selectivity Data on the Inhibition of Homologous
Cathepsins
Figure 4. Difference electron density maps contoured at 2.5σ
of purine derivatives 9c and 9d (green) in complex with
cathepsin K (yellow). PDB codes are 1U9W (9c) and 1U9X (9d).
The picture was produced using the program O.17
purine ring in the active site cleft is slightly different
from that observed in the X-ray structure of the cyclo-
hexyl derivative 4b/enzyme complex. In the case of 4b,
this tilt is necessary to enable the bulkier cyclohexyl
moiety to fit into S2. Again, the nitrile forms a covalent
bond to Cys25 of cathepsin K. The difference electron
density map for the 9d/cathepsin K complex is very
similar to that of 9c except that there is some weak
density present for the propylpiperazine part of the
inhibitor. This density was found to be best represented
when two conformations were modeled. Multiple con-
formations were also modeled for the cyclopentane ring.
In summary, we have discovered novel potent cathep-
sin K inhibitors, starting from the purine-based HTS
hit 1a. A representative inhibitor (9d) of this purine
series proved efficacious in a functional in vitro bone-
resorption assay. Moreover, the high-resolution X-ray
structure of 4b was in good agreement with the pre-
dicted binding mode of these heterocyclic inhibitors and
provides valuable information for the design of different
nonpeptidic inhibitors.
a Inhibition of rh cathepsins K, L, and S in a fluorescence-based
assay employing Z-Phe-Arg-AMC (cath K and L) and Z-Leu-Leu-
Arg-AMC (cath S) as synthetic substrates. Data represent the
mean of two experiments performed in duplicate.
were also meant to interact with the side chain of Asp
61, thereby further improving activity and specificity
for cathepsin K. The results displayed in Table 3 show
that 9a-d are generally low-nanomolar inhibitors of
cathepsin K but do not exhibit improved potency
compared to compounds 4. Inhibitors 9a and 9b having
a 2-benzyloxy substituent at the phenyl moiety are
slightly less potent than 9c and 9d, which incorporate
an o-propoxy linker positioned at the 6-aminophenyl
ring. The observation that compounds 9 do not show a
better overall specificity profile than compounds 4
indicated that the substituents attached to the 2-posi-
tion of the aminophenyl moiety apparently do not extend
into the S3 subsite of cathepsin K. However, it is
noteworthy that the selectivity profile of compounds 9
changes depending on the nature of the spacer used to
direct these potential P3 substituents into the S3 pocket.
While 2-benzyloxy-containing compounds 9a and 9b
have better selectivity vs cathepsin L, compounds with
a 2-propoxy substituent, 9c and 9d, prove to be more
specific against cathepsin S. In the functional in vitro
rabbit bone-resorption assay, 9d inhibits bone resorp-
tion with an IC50 of 176 nM.16
X-ray crystal structures were obtained for complexes
of 9c and 9d and cathepsin K. These structures revealed
that the substituents that were intended to bind in the
S3 subsite of the enzyme do not occupy a fixed position
and face toward the solvent rather than bind in the S3
part of the active site cleft. The difference electron
density map for 9c (Figure 4 left) shows very strong
contributions from the ligand except for the imidazolyl
group and its propyl linker, indicating that this part of
the molecule is highly flexible. The density for the
cyclopentane ring also suggests that this group is in
more than one orientation. The phenyl ring binds in the
S2 subsite as expected. Interestingly the tilt of the
Acknowledgment. The authors thank P. Ramage,
S. Geisse, and T. Inaoka for cathepsin K production,18
S. Niwa for performing the bone-resorption assay, and
I. Sigg for technical assistance.
Supporting Information Available: Description of the
inhibition assays and characterization (1H NMR and HRMS)
of 1a-c, 4a-c, and 9a-d and crystallographic structure
determination of 4b, 9c, and 9d in complex with cathepsin K.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
References
(1) Hernandez, A. A.; Roush, W. R. Recent advances in the synthe-
sis, design and selection of cysteine protease inhibitors. Curr
Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 45-465.
(2) Leung, D.; Abbenante, G.; Fairlie, D. P. Protease inhibitors:
current status and future prospects. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43,
305-341.
(3) Yamashita, D. S.; Dodds, R. A. Cathepsin K and the design of
inhibitors of cathepsin K. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2000, 6, 1-24.
(4) Veber, D. F.; Thompson, S. K. The therapeutic potential of
advances in cysteine protease inhibitor design. Curr. Opin. Drug
Discovery Dev. 2000, 3, 362-369.
(5) Marquis, R. W. Inhibition of cysteine proteases. Annu. Rep. Med.
Chem. 2000, 35, 309-320.
(6) Deaton, D. N.; Kumar, S. Cathepsin K inhibitors: their potential
as anti-osteoporosis agents. Prog. Med. Chem. 2004, 42, 245-
375.
(7) Inaoka, T.; Bilbe, G.; Ishibashi, O.; Tezuka, K.; Kumegawa, M.;
Kokubo, T. Molecular cloning of human c-DNA for cathepsin K:
novel cysteine protease predominantely expressed in bone.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995, 206, 89-96.