Hydrocarbyl Ligands Bonded to {Mo2Cp2(µ-SMe)3}
Organometallics, Vol. 24, No. 25, 2005 6277
calculations support strongly a η1 agostic mode of
coordination in 1, for which a diffraction study was
unobtainable. For the semibridging alkyl complex [Mo2-
Cp2(µ-SMe)3(µ-CH2CH2Tol)] (3) theoretical calculations
confirm the heavy-atom skeleton determined by X-ray
diffraction and predict a η1 agostic coordination for the
bridging group. They also allow the fluxionality of 3 to
be rationalized. Studies of the electrochemical reduction
of the µ-alkylidene derivative 1 in the presence or
absence of protons reveal its relationships with the
µ-vinyl and µ-alkyl complexes. The products of the
electrochemical reduction of the µ-alkylidene derivative
1 depend on whether hydrogen ions are freely avail-
able: in the presence of acid the µ-alkyl complex 3 is
the major product; in the absence of acid the µ-vinyl
species 2 is formed in addition to 3 and the product ratio
2:3 increases as the starting concentration of 1 is
decreased.
presence of 3 equiv of NaBH4 (0.017 g) for 1 h at room
temperature. The solution readily turned color from brown to
green. The solvent was then removed under vacuum, and the
organometallic products were extracted with diethyl ether (2
× 20 mL). After evaporation of the diethyl ether, the residue
was chromatographed on a silica gel column. Elution with a
mixture of CH2Cl2/hexane (1:4) afforded a green solution of 3,
which was evaporated under vacuum. Compound 3 was
obtained as a green powder (0.025 g, 29% yield).
3. 1H NMR (toluene-d8, 25 °C; δ): 6.96 (d, 2H, JHH ) 7.8
Hz, CH3C6H4), 6.85 (d, 2H, JHH ) 7.8 Hz, CH3C6H4), 5.05 (s,
10H, C5H5), 2.42 (pt, 2H, JHH ) 6.6 Hz, Tol-CH2CH2-Mo) 2.15
(s, 3H, CH3C6H4), 1.71 (s, 3H, SCH3), 1.64 (s, 3H, SCH3), 1.17
(s, 3H, SCH3), -5.57 (br, 2H, Tol-CH2CH2-Mo). 13C{1H} NMR
(toluene-d8, 25 °C; δ): [139-125] (CH3C6H4), 90.0 (C5H5), 34.4
(Tol-CH2CH2-Mo), 21.1 (CH3C6H4), 12.3 (SCH3), 11.8 (SCH3),
10.9 (SCH3), 1.9 (Tol-CH2CH2-Mo). Anal. Calcd for C22H30-
Mo2S3, 1/4 CH2Cl2: C, 44.2; H, 5.1. Found C, 44.0; H, 5.2.
3 (R ) Ph).1H NMR (tol-d8, 25 °C; δ): 7.12-6.90 (m, 5H,
-C6H5), 5.04 (s, 10H, C5H5), 2.42 (pt, 2H, Ph-CH2CH2-Mo),
1.71 (s, 3H, SCH3), 1.65 (s, 3H, SCH3), 1.15 (s, 3H, SCH3),
-5.58 (br, 2H, Ph-CH2CH2-Mo).
Experimental Section
Controlled-Potential Electrolyses of 1. (a) In the
Absence of Acid. A 16.5 mg portion (2.5 × 10-5 mol) of
complex 1 was dissolved in 15 mL of CH2Cl2-[NBu4][PF6]
under N2, and the potential of the Pt cathode was set at -1.2
V. The electrolysis was completed after transfer of 2.2 C (0.9
F mol-1 of 1). The catholyte was cannulated in a Schlenk flask
and the solvent removed under reduced pressure. A 10 mL
portion of pentane was then added to the solid residue, and
the mixture was stirred for 10 min before being filtered. The
filtrate was dried under vacuum. The solid residue was
dissolved in C6D6, and the products formed by electrolysis were
General Procedures and Materials. All reactions were
performed under an atmosphere of argon or dinitrogen using
conventional Schlenk techniques. Solvents were deoxygenated
and dried by standard methods. Literature methods were used
for the preparation of [Mo2Cp2(µ-SMe)3(µ-CHCH2R)]BF4 (1).6a
All other reagents were purchased commercially. Yields of all
products are relative to the starting dimolybdenum complexes.
Column chromatography was carried out with silica gel
purchased from SDS. Chemical analyses were performed
either by the Service de Microanalyse ICSN, Gif sur Yvette,
France, or by the Centre de Microanalyses du CNRS, Vernai-
son, France. IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet-Nexus FT
IR spectrometer from KBr pellets. The NMR spectra (1H, 13C),
in CDCl3 or C6D6 solutions, were recorded with a Bruker AC
300 or AMX 400 spectrometer and were referenced to SiMe4.
1H-13C 2D experiments were carried out on a Bruker DRX
500 spectrometer. The preparation and the purification of the
supporting electrolyte [NBu4][PF6] and the electrochemical
equipment were as described previously.25 All of the potentials
(text, tables, figures) are quoted against the ferrocene-
ferrocenium couple; ferrocene was added as an internal
standard at the end of the experiments.
1
characterized by H NMR.
(b) In the Presence of HBF4/Et2O. In a typical experi-
ment, to 13.9 mg (2.1 × 10-5 mol) of 1 dissolved in 15 mL of
CH2Cl2-[NBu4][PF6] under N2 was added 2 equiv of HBF4/
Et2O. The controlled-potential electrolysis was performed at
-1.2 V. The catholyte was treated as above.
Crystal Structure Determinations of 2 and 3. Pertinent
data are summarized in Table 4. Measurements for 2 were
made at 100 K on a Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer, while
those for 3 were made at room temperature on a Nonius CAD4
diffractometer. Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.710 73 Å) was used in
both experiments. The structures were solved and refined by
standard procedures.26 H atoms were positioned using stereo-
chemical considerations, the orientations of methyl groups
being initially obtained from difference maps, and then rode
on their parent carbon atoms.
Molecules of 2 are disordered over two sites related ap-
proximately by the pseudosymmetrical mirror operation
1.5 - x, y, z. The main structure with occupancy 0.764(3) is
shown in Figure 2. Cp and phenyl rings were refined as regular
polygons, and anisotropic vibration tensors were refined only
for Mo and S atoms. This model, the best of several that were
considered, was refined satisfactorily with data averaged
assuming mmm Laue symmetry (see Table 4). Although the
overlapping of the molecular images obscures the finer details
of the structure, in particular the position of the H atom
attached to C(4), we consider that the main features of the
heavy-atom skeleton are reliably established. The disorder
seems to be a general feature of the crystals, since data sets
from three different specimens gave essentially the same
results. For 3 the crystals were small and of poor quality.
Refinement using a conventional model (Uij tensors for all
non-H atoms) established the heavy-atom skeleton but did not
yield experimental positions for the C(4) H atoms.
Reaction of 1 with Butyllithium. Complex 1 (0.1 g, 1.5
mmol) and 1.5 equiv of n-butyllithium (V ) 900 µL, 2.5 M
solution in hexane) were stirred in tetrahydrofuran (30 mL)
at 0 °C for 20 min. The solution turned color from brown to
purple. After evaporation of the solvents, 2 was extracted with
diethyl ether (3 × 10 mL). Evaporation of the volatiles and
washing of the residue with cold pentane afforded 2 as a purple
solid (0.08 g, 92% yield).
2. 1H NMR (C6D6, 25 °C; δ): 7.18 (d, 1H, JHH ) 15.0 Hz,
Tol-CHdCH-Mo), 7.04 (d, 2H, JHH ) 7.8 Hz, CH3C6H4), 6.92
(d, 2H, JHH ) 7.8 Hz, CH3C6H4), 6.73 (d, 1H, JHH ) 15.0 Hz,
Tol-CHdCH-Mo), 4.97 (s, 10H, C5H5), 2.06 (s, 3H, CH3C6H4)
1.70 (s, 3H, SCH3), 1.58 (s, 3H, SCH3), 1.54 (s, 3H, SCH3). 13C-
{1H} NMR (C6D6, 25 °C; δ): 153.8 (Tol-CHdCH-Mo), 139.1,
136.6, 129.4, 127.5 (CH3C6H4), 104.8 (Tol-CHdCH-Mo), 91.0
(C5H5), 21.1 (CH3C6H4), 16.3 (SCH3), 10.2 (SCH3), 9.8 (SCH3).
Anal. Calcd for C22H28Mo2S3: C, 45.5; H, 4.9. Found: C, 45.5;
H, 4.9.
1
2 (R ) Ph). H NMR (C6D6, 25 °C; δ): 7.21 (d, 1H, JHH
)
15.0 Hz, Ph-CHdCH-Mo), 7.16-7.06 (m, 5H, C6H5), 6.68 (d,
1H, JHH ) 15.0 Hz, Ph-CHdCH-Mo), 4.97 (s, 10H, C5H5), 1.72
(s, 3H, SCH3), 1.54 (s, 3H, SCH3), 1.49 (s, 3H, SCH3).
Reaction of 1 with NaBH4. A solution of complex 1 (0.1
g, 0.15 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (30 mL) was stirred in the
(26) Programs used: (a) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELX97; University of
Go¨ttingen, Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1998. (b) Farrugia, L. J. WinGX-A
Windows Program for Crystal Structure Analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr.
1999, 32, 837.
(25) Cabon, J. Y.; Le Roy, C.; Muir, K. W.; Pe´tillon, F. Y.; Quentel,
F.; Schollhammer, P.; Talarmin, J. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3033.