386 ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS
Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2000). Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in
proactivty during organizational entry: A latent growth modeling approach to understand-
ing newcomer adaptation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 190-210.
Chou, C., Bentler, P. M., & Pentz, M. A. (1998). Comparisons of two statistical approaches to
study growth curves: The multilevel model and the latent curve analysis. Structural Equa-
tion Modeling, 5, 247-266.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behav-
ioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Deadrick, D. L., Bennett, N., & Russell, C. J. (1997). Using hierarchical linear modeling to ex-
amine dynamic performance criteria over time. Journal of Management, 23, 745-757.
DeShon, R. P., Ployhart, R. E., & Sacco, J. M. (1998). The estimation of reliability in longitudi-
nal models. International Journal of Behavior and Development, 22, 493-515.
Garst, H., Frese, M., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2000). The temporal factor of change in stressor-
strain relationships: A growth curve model on a longitudinal study in East Germany. Jour-
nal of Applied Psychology, 85, 417-438.
Gonzales, R., & Griffin, D. (2001). Testing parameters in structural equation modeling: Every
“one” matters. Psychological Methods, 6, 258-269.
Gottman, J. M. (1995). The analysis of change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hand, D., & Crowder, M. (1996). Practical longitudinal data analysis. London: Chapman &
Hall.
Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An introduction to the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models.
Journal of Management, 23, 723-744.
Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Theo-
retical and methodological implications for research in organizations. Journal of Manage-
ment, 24, 623-641.
Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear
modeling to organizational research. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel
theory, research, and methods inorganizations(pp. 467-511). SanFrancisco:Jossey-Bass.
Hofmann, D. A., Jacobs, R., & Baratta, J. E. (1993). Dynamic criteria and the measurement of
change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 194-204.
Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1986). Consequences of violating the independence assumption in
analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 422-431.
Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
Lance, C. E., Meade, A. W., & Williamson, G. M. (2000). We should measure change—and
here’s how. In G. M. Williamson & D. R. Shaffer (Eds.), Physical illness and depression in
older adults: A handbook of theory, research, and practice (pp. 201-235). New York:
Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Lance, C. E., Vandenberg, R. J., & Self, R. M. (2000). Latent growth models of individual
change: The case of newcomer adjustment. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision
Processes, 83, 107-140.
Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS system for mixed
models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Little, R. J. A., & Schlenker, N. (1995). Missing data. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E.
Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences
(pp. 39-75). New York: Plenum.
Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide. LosAngeles:Muthen&Muthen.
Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York:
Springer-Verlag.
Ployhart, R. E., & Hakel, M. D. (1998). The substantive nature of performance variability: Pre-
dicting interindividual differences in intraindividual performance. Personnel Psychology,
51, 859-901.