284
J. McNulty et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 281–285
3. Conclusion
was weighed compound 2 (74.0 mg, 0.278 mmol) under
argon and dry THF (556 lL) added to make a 0.5 M
solution. The flask was stirred for 15 min. at ꢀ78 ꢁC
whereupon sec-BuLi (239 lL, 0.334 mmol, 1.4 M stock,
C6H12) was added slowly. After 40 min, a 0.5 M solution
(in THF) of piperonal (50 mg, 0.333 mmol) was added
slowly to the reaction flask at ꢀ78 ꢁC. The flask was
kept at ꢀ78 ꢁC for 2 h and then slowly warmed to room
temperature where it was stirred for further 2 h. The
resulting mixture was concentrated to remove solvent.
Water was added (5 mL) to the residue, and the result-
ing mixture was extracted with dichloromethane
(3 · 15 mL). The combined organic layers were dried
(MgSO4), filtered and concentrated. Purification using
silica gel column chromatography (EtOAc) yielded 3a,
79.1 mg, (87%) as a yellow semisolid. Rf (EtOAc):
In conclusion, we describe the synthesis and isolation of
an a-silyldimethylaminophosphonate 2 and reaction of
its anion with aldehydes yielding a-phosphonoenamines.
The scope of the Peterson route to a-phosphonoenam-
ines 3 described herein is wide and an expanded range
of derivatives are now available using this methodology
in higher yields than previous related methods and with
high (E)-selectivity.6,7 While certain of these derivatives
have been prepared using the Horner–Emmons olefin-
ation reaction of diphosphonates,4 the greater effi-
ciency of the Peterson olefination likely derives from
the higher oxygenophilicity of silicon versus phospho-
rus,8 enabling milder reaction conditions and minimiz-
ing the decomposition of labile a-phosphonoenamines
3. An optimized protocol is described for the hydrolysis
of these intermediates in warm hydrobromic acid which
appears to be a general method for the overall conver-
sion of both aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes into the
homologous carboxylic acid derivatives. Work in our
laboratories continues with the exploration of the reac-
tivity of a-phosphonoenamines with a view to expand-
ing their chemical utility and will be reported in due
course.
0.36. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3):
d 1.35 (t,
JHH = 7.0 Hz, 6H); 2.65 (d, JPH = 2.0 Hz, 6H); 4.13
(m, 4H); 5.94 (s, 2H); 6.67 (d, JPH = 14.86 Hz, 1H);
6.75 (d, JHH = 7.8 Hz, 1H); 7.45 (s, 1H); 13C NMR
(50 MHz, CDCl3): d 16.4 (d, J = 6.8 Hz); 43.1 (d,
J = 2.3 Hz); 61.6 (d, J = 5.6 Hz); 101.1; 107.9; 109.3;
125.0; 129.4; 130.9 (d, J = 31.8 Hz); 137.8 (d,
J = 182.1 Hz); 147.3; 147.5; 31P NMR (80 MHz,
CDCl3): d 18.0; HRMS (M)+ calcd. for C15H22NO5P:
327.1237; found: 327.1236.
General procedure for Table 2: Synthesis of 4a. Into a
flame dried flask was weighed phosphonoenamine 3a
(50 mg, 0.158 mmol) and 3.0 mL of 48% HBr was
added to the flask. The flask was heated with a heat
gun for 10 min. The flask was cooled immediately.
Deposits were seen in the reaction flask, which was
extracted with diethyl ether (3 · 15 mL). The com-
bined organic layers were dried over (MgSO4),
filtered and concentrated to yield 4a, 26.8 mg, (95%);
off-white solid, mp 125–127 ꢁC; CAS registry number
[2861-28-1].
4. Experimental
Synthesis of 2. Into a 20 mL flame-dried round bottom
flask, containing a magnetic stirring bar, was added
diethyl
N0,N-dimethylaminophosphonate
(500 lL,
4.128 mmol) under argon. To this was added dry THF
(8.26 mL). The contents were cooled to ꢀ78 ꢁC and
stirred for 15 min. whereupon TMS–Cl (550 lL,
4.349 mmol) was added to the reaction flask over
5 min. Upon stirring for 30 min., a solution of LDA
(2.5 mL, 5.0 mmol, 2 M, THF) was added slowly to
the reaction flask maintained at ꢀ78 ꢁC. The flask was
kept at ꢀ78 ꢁC for 2 h and then slowly warmed to room
temperature where it was stirred for a further 6 h. The
resulting mixture was concentrated to remove solvent.
Water was added (10 mL) to the residue, and the result-
ing mixture was extracted with dichloromethane
(3 · 15 mL). The combined organic layers were dried
(MgSO4), filtered and concentrated. The product,
Rf = 0.32 (EtOAc, pink-red to ninhydrin), was purified
by silica gel column chromatography (EtOAc). The sil-
ica gel was neutralized by adding five drops of triethyl-
amine into the initial silica gel slurry. The title
compound 2, 882.2 mg (80%) was isolated as a brown
Acknowledgements
We thank NSERC, Cytec Canada Inc. and McMaster
University for financial support of this work.
References and notes
1. For some recent examples, see: (a) Wu, J.; Sun, X.; Xia,
H.-G. Green Chem. 2006, 8, 365–367; (b) Palacios, F.;
Ochoa de Retana, A. M.; Alonso, J. M. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 8895–8901; (c) Azizi, N.; Saidi, M. R. Tetra-
hedron 2003, 59, 5329–5332; (d) Steere, J. A.; Sampson, P.
B.; Honek, J. F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 12, 457–
460; (e) Kafarski, P.; Lejczak, B. Curr. Med. Chem. Anti
Cancer Agents 2001, 1, 301–312.
2. Li, S.; Whitehead, J. K.; Hammer, R. P. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 3116–3118.
3. Pratt, R. F. Science 1989, 246, 917–919.
4. (a) Qian, D. Q.; Shi, D. S.; Cao, R. Z.; Liu, L. Z.
Heteroatom Chem. 1999, 10, 271–276; (b) Costisella, B.;
Keitel, I.; Gross, H. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 1227–1232; (c)
Ahlbrecht, H.; Farnung, W. Synthesis 1977, 336–338; (d)
Gross, H.; Costisella, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1
oil. H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): d 0.14 (s, 9H); 1.33
(t, JHH = 6.4 Hz, 6H); 2.38 (d, JPH = 22.2 Hz, 1H);
2.47 (s, 6H); 4.07 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3):
d ꢀ0.6 (d, J = 2.5 Hz); 16.5 (dd, J = 6.30, 2.5 Hz); 45.5
(d, J = 3.8 Hz); 55.3 (d, J = 112.5 Hz); 60.7 (t,
J = 7.8 Hz); 31P NMR (80 MHz, CDCl3): d 30.75;
HRMS (M)+ calcd. for C10H26N1O3SiP: 267.1421,
found: 267.1420.
General procedure for Table 1: Synthesis of 3a. Into a
flame-dried flask, containing a magnetic stirring bar,