Y. Leblanc et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 2125–2128
2127
Table 4
Table 2
Human DP1 and TP receptor functional activity of compounds 11a and 11b15
Ki values of 5-azaindoles as PGD2 antagonists14
a
IC50 (nM)
DP PRPc
R
Ar
DPWPb
TP PRPd
—
S
N
11a
11b
0.22 0.10 (n = 5)
0.14 0.04 (n = 8)
4.99 1.63 (n = 5)
2.15 0.57 (n = 7)
N
CO2H
4040 1330 (n = 11)
a
n
Values are means from at least three experiments. IC50 = concentration at which
process is inhibited by 50%.
b
DP WP assay involved inhibition of the accumulation of cAMP in washed
n
R
Ar
DPa Ki
(nM)
TPa Ki
(nM)
platelets challenged with PGD2.
c
DP PRP assay involved inhibition of the accumulation of cAMP in platelet-rich
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
SO2Me
SO2Me
SO2Me
H
Phenyl
Ethyl
Ethyl
Cyclopropyl
Cyclopropyl
1-Methyl-
cyclopropyl
1-Methyl-
cyclopropyl
n-Propyl
Isopropyl
Isopropyl
Isopropyl
Isopropyl
Isopropyl
Isopropyl
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
4-Chlorophenyl
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
1.3
1.4
2.1
13.6
1.0
1.0
0.91
2.5
0.8
1.0
995
plasma challenged with PGD2.
6887
12183
2917
d
TP PRP assay involved the inhibition of U44619-induced platelet aggregation in
platelet-rich plasma.
>20
687
lM
1687
990
415
587
Table 5
Pharmacokinetic data of 11b
Rat
Beagle dog
Cyno monkey
Squirrel monkey
F (%)
Terminal t1/2 (h)
Cmax (lM)
CLp (ml/min/kg)
53
23
4
43
40
1
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
0.74
3428
8.3 (10)
28 (30)
1.6 (10)
0.47 (10)
8.6 (10)
9.0 (10)
4.0 (2)
1.2 (2)
13.8 (10)
0.06 (4)
21 (2)
1.2 (2)
1.4 (10)
8.5 (10)
7.3 (5)
0.78 (5)
41
42
43
11
44
45
46
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
4-Chlorophenyl
1.14
0.71
0.88
0.53
1.2
626
2813
468
2081
>20uM
387
Vdss (L/kg)
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
3,4-Dichlorophenyl
2,6-Dichlorophenyl
2,4-Dichlorophenyl
4-
Doses (mg/kg) are indicated in parenthesis.
0.39
0.67
6144
4). Compound 11b also demonstrates high levels of functional
selectivity versus TP (IC50 4040 nM) as predicted from the receptor
binding assay. Excellent pharmacokinetics were observed with
compound 11b (Table 5) in rat, dog, cynomolgus monkey and
squirrel monkey.
Trifluoromethylphenyl
2,4,5-Trichlorophenyl
47
1
Isopropyl
0.39
186
a
Radioligand competition binding assays using recombinant human prosta-
glandin D2 (DP1) and recombinant human thromboxane receptor (TP).Values are
means from at least three experiments.
In summary, potent and selective DP1 antagonists were identi-
fied in both the 5- and 7-azaindoles series. 5-Azaindoles in partic-
ular, possess excellent pharmacokinetics and selectivity profile for
further development.
exhibited short half-lives and low exposure in rats. For example
compound 32, in rat, has a half-life of 2.2 h (IV 5 mg/kg) and rat
bile cannulation study (IV 5 mg/kg) indicated rapid excretion in
bile (56% of parent compound over 5 h, (Cmax 2 mM, Tmax 0.5 h).
Replacement of the methylsulfone functional group by an alkyl
substituent was shown to provide highly potent, selective com-
pounds that possess favorable pharmacokinetics. The racemic iso-
propyl analog 11 exhibited the best overall profile. The in vitro
profiles of both enantiomers 11a and 11b are described in Table
3. It is interesting to note that both enantiomer 11a and 11b are al-
most equipotent, whereas the enantiomer of MK-0524 is 1000-fold
less active than MK-0524.
References and notes
1. Capuzzi, D. M.; Morgan, J. M.; Brusco, O. A.; Intenzo, C. M. Curr. Atheroscler Rep.
2000, 2, 64.
2. Cheng, K.; Wu, T. J.; Wu, K. K.; Sturino, C.; Metters, K.; Gottesdiener, K.; Wright,
S. D.; Wang, Z.; O’Neill, G.; Lai, E.; Waters, M. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006,
103, 6682.
3. Lai, E.; Wenning, L. A.; Crumley, T. M.; De Lepeleire, I.; Liu, F.; de Hoon, J. N.; Van
Hecken, A.; Depré, M.; Hilliard, D.; Greenberg, H.; O’Neill, G.; Metters, K.;
Gottesdiener, K. G.; Wagner, J. A. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 83, 840.
4. Paolini, J. F.; Bays, H. E.; Ballantyne, C. M.; Davidson, M.; Pasternak, R.;
Maccubbin, D.; Norquist, J. M.; Lai, E.; Waters, M. G.; Kuznetsova, O.; Sisk, C. M.;
Mitchel, Y. B. Cardiol. Clin. 2008, 26, 547.
From Table 3 data it can be concluded that both enantiomers
have comparable overall profile in term of DP1 binding affinity
and selectivity. However, antagonist 11b displays superior potency
in the DP1 functional assay15 where it inhibits the PGD2 induced
production of cAMP in platelet rich plasma with an IC50 value of
2.2 nM compared to 5.0 nM in the case of enantiomer 11a (Table
5. Sturino, C. F.; O’Neill, G.; Lachance, N.; Boyd, M.; Berthelette, C.; Labelle, M.; Li,
L.; Roy, B.; Scheigetz, J.; Tsou, N.; Aubin, Y.; Bateman, K. P.; Chauret, N.; Day, S.
H.; Levesque, J. F.; Seto, C.; Silva, J. H.; Trimble, L. A.; Carriere, M. C.; Denis, D.;
Greig, G.; Kargman, S.; Lamontagne, S.; Mathieu, M.-C.; Sawyer, N.; Slipetz, D.;
Abraham, W. M.; Jones, T.; McAuliffe, M.; Piechuta, H.; Nicoll-Griffith, D. A.;
Wang, Z.; Zamboni, R.; Young, R. N.; Metters, K. M. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 794.
6. Beaulieu, C.; Guay, D.; Wang, Z.; Leblanc, Y.; Roy, P.; Dufresne, C.; Zamboni, R.;
Berthelette, C.; Day, S.; Tsou, N.; Denis, D.; Greig, G.; Mathieu, M.-C.; O’Neill, G.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 2696.
7. Hemtsberger, H.; Knittel, D.; Wiedmawn, H. Monatsh. Chem. 1970, 101, 161.
8. Fresneda, P. M.; Molina, P.; Delgado, S.; Bleda, J. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
4777.
9. Roy, P. J.; Dufresne, C.; Lachance, N.; Leclerc, J.-P.; Boisvert, M.; Wang, Z.;
Leblanc, Y. Synthesis 2005, 16, 2751.
10. Roy, P. J.; Boisvert, M.; Leblanc, Y. Org. Synth. 2007, 84, 262.
11. X-ray coordinates of resolved ester 10 (less mobile on OD column 10%
isopropanol in hexane) were deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic
Centre Data for small molecules (deposit number 721867).
12. Kao, B. C.; Doshi, H.; Rejes-Rivera, H.; Titus, D. D.; Yin, M.; Dalton, D. R. J.
Heterocycl. Chem. 1991, 28, 1315.
13. Leblanc, Y.; Dufresne, C.; Roy, P. WO2004039807, 2004 May 13.
14. Abramovitz, M.; Adam, M.; Boie, Y.; Carriere, M.-C.; Denis, D.; Godbout, C.;
Lamontagne, S.; Rochette, C.; Sawyer, N.; Tremblay, N. M.; Belley, M.; Gallant,
M.; Dufresne, C.; Gareau, Y.; Ruel, R.; Juteau, H.; Labelle, M.; Ouimet, N.;
Metters, K. M. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1483, 285.
Table 3
Receptor binding profiles of enantiomers 11a and 11b
Ki (nM)
11a
11b
DP1
TP
0.64 0.12
5039 1426
28,500
7323 3181
710 55
6549 5412
25,700
>25,700
0.32 0.13
935 220
28,500
3975 2768
851 320
>11,300
>25,700
>20,500
4789 2440
EP1
EP2
EP3
EP4
FP
IP
CRTH2
233 59