Scheme 3. Cross-Metathesis and Michael Addition
Figure 3. Catalysts for the cross-metathesis reaction.
from the convex face and furnished the final syn addition
product 12. The selective reduction at C16 thus became the
pivotal transformation. Here, the hydride source had to
approach the carbonyl carbon from the most hindered side,
the interior of the concave face. A variety of reagents were
tested for diastereoselective reduction, but most reducing
reagents, and in particular bulky regents such as L-selectride,
gave the undesired isomer with good selectivity, inversion
of which under Mitsunobu conditions could not be achieved.
Only reduction with LiAlH4 provided the required config-
uration at C16 with >20:1 selectivity.
Next, a cross metathesis is required to install the conju-
gated ester functionality for an intramolecular Michael
addition. Several metathesis catalysts have been used in order
to induce this transformation, and it turned out that the
Hoveyda-Grubbs second-generation catalyst 187 and Grela’s
p-nitro-substituted analogue 198 (Figure 3) could facilitate
this transformation in equal yields (80%, Scheme 3).
product 2 was obtained as an inseparable mixture (4:1) of
two diastereomers. NOESY experiments and coupling con-
stants give strong evidence that the major isomer exhibits
the desired stereochemistry, matching the title compound 2
(Figure 4). The NOESY cross-peak between H20 and H16
TBDPS-protection and hydrolysis of one TBS group was
followed by TPAP oxidation in 79% yield over three steps
to yield ketoester 15. With compound 15 in our hands, we
were in a position to perform the crucial step to close the
C-ring via a Michael reaction.
Several reagents and conditions were tried for this
transformation without success.9 Eventually, thermodynamic
TMS-enol ether formation was achieved with TMSI and
(TMS)2NH in 1,2-dichloroethane as the solvent10 and in-
stantly provided the cyclobutane adduct 16 through a
subsequent aldol reaction in 68% yield.11
Figure 4. Assignment of the stereochemistry confirms the forma-
tion of the desired diastereomer 2 (the numbering corresponds to
the natural product).
Finally, cyclobutane 16 was opened with TBAF in THF
to establish the A,B,C-ring system (2) of hexacyclinic acid
with nine contiguous chiral centers in 20 steps. Cyclization
supports the correct stereochemistry at C19. Assuming that
the configuration between the four- and five-membered rings
in 16 is cis since the trans configuration would produce high
ring strain, the new stereocenters in 2 must be cis-configured.
For C8, we have no direct evidence, but the coupling
constants of H9b also indicate H9b-H8 trans configuration.
(7) Kingsbury, J. S.; Harrity, J. P. A.; Bonitatebus, P. J.; Hoveyda, A.
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 791.
(8) Grela, K.; Harutyunyan, S.; Michrowska, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 4038.
(9) For example, treatment of ketone 15 with secondary amines like
proline, pyrrolidine, or diethylamine did not give any reaction.
(10) Ihara, M.; Taniguchi, T.; Makita, K.; Takano, M.; Ohnishi, M.;
Taniguchu, N.; Fukumoto, K.; Kabuto, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
8107.
Interestingly, the intramolecular Michael addition parallels
recent results on the biosynthesis of hexacyclinic acid from
the Zeeck group. Through feeding experiments, it could be
shown that the tetrahydropyran oxygen O6 is not derived
from acetate or propionate but from external water (Figure
(11) 1H NMR indicates the formation of four stereoisomers of the
cyclobutane intermediate 16. The geometry of the intermediate enol ether
is suspected to be a mixture, with the (E)-isomer as the major isomer. For
the formation of a thermodynamic enol ether with TMSI/(TMS)2NH, see
also: Sedrani, R.; Krallen, J.; Cabrejas, L. M. M.; Papageorgiou, C. D.;
Senia, F.; Rohrbach, S.; Wagner, D.; Thai, B.; Eme, A.-M. J.; France, J.;
Oberer, L.; Rihs, G.; Zenke, G.; Wagner, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
3849.
(12) Meyer, S. W. Dissertation, Georg-August-Universita¨t zu Go¨ttingen,
Go¨ttingen, Germany, 2003.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 22, 2004
3891