C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
molecular mechanical model to realistically simulate the reaction
of 5 eV O(3P) with an octanethiol SAM.12 A comparison between
the simulation of neutral scattering at 45° incidence and our ion-
scattering experiment is not completely unreasonable, because in
the latter, the incident O+(4S) ions neutralize to become O(3P)
immediately prior to impact with the SAM.13 The simulations
predict that hydrogen abstraction is the dominant reaction channel
and that abstraction occurs only at the top three carbon atoms in
an alkanethiol chain, in qualitative agreement with the results
presented in Figure 2b. Furthermore, the trajectories show a 4-fold
preference for abstraction from the methylene rather than the methyl
hydrogens, when O(3P) approaches the SAM in the direction
opposite to the SAM tilt orientation. In contrast, the experimental
data indicate a much stronger preference for abstraction occurring
from primary rather than secondary carbon sites. Although the
experiments cannot resolve the scattering from a single orientational
domain, the discrepancy in site selectivity between simulation and
experiment is quantitatively significant. The simulations track only
the adiabatic channel leading to neutral OH, whereas the experiment
detects OH-/OD- emerging nonadiabatically. The nascent OH-
product formed deep within the SAM layer will have a difficult
time retaining its negative charge as it passes between the chains
on escape. Hence, the detection of only negative ions in the
experiment may weight the distribution shown in Figure 2b in slight
favor of abstraction sites close to the vacuum interface.
Figure 2. (a) Dependence of POD on the incident O+ energy and on the
labeled position (triangles, C-12; squares, C-11; diamonds, C-10) of
1-dodecanethiol. (b) Relative contribution of scattered hydroxide signal,
arising from abstraction at the top three carbon atoms, as a function of the
incident O+ energy. The latter data have been corrected for velocity-
dependent charge-transfer rates along the outgoing trajectory.
POD depends strongly on the O+ dose, because ion-induced
damage of the SAM alters the layer’s structure and chemical
composition. Consequently, we present only POD values recorded
at low doses (<1013 ions/cm2) before the SAM becomes damaged.
Figure 2a shows the dependence of POD on the incident O+ energy
for SAMs labeled at the C-10, C-11, and C-12 positions. POD is
vanishingly small for abstraction originating from C-10 and
presumably is negligible for positions below C-10. Although
experimental protocols were employed to minimize contamination
from any unlabeled molecules, the sum of POD contributions for
C-10, C-11, and C-12 is 7-16% less than the expected value of
100%. One possible explanation for this deficit is a kinetic isotope
effect, through which D is abstracted less readily than H, all else
being equal. Classical trajectory calculations predict only a 3.5%
kinetic isotope effect for O(3P) abstracting H versus D from
propane;11 hence, there is little reason to believe that a kinetic
isotope effect will adequately account for the missing intensity in
the present experiment. A more plausible explanation for the
shortfall in the OD- signal relative to the OH- signal involves the
nonadiabaticity of charge transfer. Figure 1 illustrates that OH-
leaves the surface with slightly more kinetic energy than does OD-.
Overall, the mean velocity of OH- appears to be ∼10% faster than
that for OD-. Consequently, a nascent OD- product is more likely
to adiabatically transfer its electron back to the surface than is a
quicker OH- product. As described in Supporting Information, the
data in Figure 2a can be corrected for charge transfer along the
outgoing trajectory to yield the relative contributions to abstraction
shown in Figure 2b. These adjusted contributions sum to 100 (
3%. At least 3/4 of the scattered abstraction signal arises from the
terminal methyl group in the SAM, and <2.5% originates from
H/D bonded to the C-10 position. This site preference is strongest
at low incident energies.
In summary, the reaction of hyperthermal (5-20 eV) O+ with
an isotopically labeled self-assembled monolayer demonstrates that
hydrogen abstraction is strongly site-specific. At 5 eV incident
energy, abstraction of hydrogen from the terminal methyl group is
favored by a factor of 4.6 over abstraction from the methylene group
just below it.
Acknowledgment. This work was performed through the Center
for Materials Chemistry in the Space Environment, a MURI
supported by the AFOSR (F49620-01-1-0335).
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis procedures and
characterization of C-10-, C-11-, and C-12-labeled 1-dodecanethiols
and charge transfer corrections to anionic product yields (PDF). This
References
(1) Jacobs, D. C. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 2002, 53, 379-407.
(2) Poirier, G. E. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1117-1127.
(3) Schreiber, F. Prog. Surf. Sci. 2000, 65, 151-256.
(4) Qin, X.; Tzvetkov, T.; Jacobs, D. C. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 2003,
203, 130-135.
(5) Torres, J.; Perry, C. C.; Bransfield, S. J.; Fairbrother, D. H. J. Phys. Chem.
B 2002, 106, 6265-6272.
(6) Dai, X. J.; Elms, F. M.; George, G. A. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 80,
1461-1469.
(7) Wagner, A. J.; Wolfe, G. M.; Fairbrother, D. H. J. Chem. Phys. 2004,
120, 3799-3810.
(8) Gu, C.; Wysocki, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12010-12011.
(9) Quinteros, C. L.; Tzvetkov, T.; Qin, X.; Jacobs, D. C. Nucl. Instrum.
Methods B 2001, 182, 187-192.
(10) Alloway, D. M.; Hofmann, M.; Smith, D. L.; Gruhn, N. E.; Graham, A.
L.; Colorado, R.; Wysocki, V. H.; Lee, T. R.; Lee, P. A.; Armstrong, N.
R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 11690-11699.
(11) Troya, D.; Schatz, G. C. Private communication.
(12) Troya, D.; Schatz, G. C. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 7696-7707.
(13) O(3P) is formed rather than O(1D) or O(1S), because the quartet to singlet
spin-flip would require an improbable two-electron rearrangement.
Troya and Schatz developed a hybrid quantum mechanical/
JA045475V
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 41, 2004 13233