902
G.J. PIAZZA ET AL.
tonitrile, 1,1,1-trifluoroacetone (300 µL), and 2 mL 40 mM MS (not derivatized): m/z (obs. fragment, intensity), 390
Na2EDTA were combined in a 50-mL glass-stoppered Erlen- ([M + 1 + 18 (H2O) + 41 (CH3CN)]+, 10.5%), 348 ([M + 18]+,
meyer flask. The flask was cooled in a 5°C water bath, and 195 14.7%), 331 ([M + 1]+, 100%); EI-MS: m/z (obs. fragment, in-
mg NaHCO3 and 0.7 g oxone were added. The reaction flask tensity), 187 ([HOCH(CH2)7COOCH3]+, 40.5%), 155 ([187 −
was shaken vigorously for 6 h. After the addition of 10 mL H2O, 32 (CH3OH)]+, 100%); APCI-MS (bis-TMS ether): m/z (obs.
the product was extracted with 50 mL diethyl ether. The ether fragment, intensity), 475 ([M + 1]+, 100%); EI-MS: m/z (obs.
fraction was washed with 2 × 20 mL H2O, dried with anhydrous fragment, intensity), 259 ([TMSOCH(CH2)7COOCH3]+,
Na2SO4, and the ether removed under a stream of nitrogen.
57.4%), 215 ([M − 259]+, 66.7%); 1H NMR: (400 MHz, C6H6,
Epoxide hydrolysis. Methyl 9,10-epoxyoctadecanoate 1 (5 δH) 1.16 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.40–1.90 (m, 24H, CH2),
mg), neutral alumina (115 mg), and cyclohexane (0.6 mL) 2.38 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, 2-H2), 3.49 (bs, 2H, 9-H, and 10-H),
were placed in a 1.7-mL glass HPLC vial with a screw cap. 3.61 (s, 3H, COOCH3); 13C NMR: (100 MHz, C6H6, δC)15.0
The vial was attached to laboratory rotator (radius of 17 cm) (C-18), 23.8, 25.9, 26.6, 26.8, 30.0, 30.2, 30.5, 30.7, 30.8,
and rotated at 3.5 revolutions per minute. At the indicated 33.0, 34.8, 51.6 (COOCH3), 75.3 (C-9 and C-10), 174.3 (C-1);
time, the contents of the vial were filtered through a sintered (100 MHz, CDCl3, δC) 14.1 (C-18), 22.7, 24.9, 25.5, 25.6,
glass funnel and the alumina was washed sequentially with 5 29.0, 29.1, 29.3, 29.4, 29.5, 29.7, 31.9, 33.6, 34.1, 51.4
mL each of methanol, dichloromethane, and diethyl ether. (COOCH3), 74.5 (C-9 and C-10), 174.3 (C-1).
Hydrolysis of methyl 9,10-12,13-diepoxyoctadecanoate 3
(ii) Methyl 9,12-epoxy-10,13-dihydroxystearate (4) and
was conducted in an identical manner except that 230 mg methyl 10,13-epoxy-9,12-dihydroxystearate (5). Peak I:
neutral alumina was used. Alternatively, the epoxides 1 and 3 RT 5.9 min; Peak II: RT 9.4 min; IR (I): 3468 (hydroxy),
were hydrolyzed by placing them in a 0.6-mL mixture of 1738 (carbonyl), 1174 (C–O–C) cm−1; IR (II): 3388, 1738,
THF/water (3:2, vol/vol) containing 1% HClO4 and agitating 1171 cm−1; APCI-MS (not derivatized) (I): 404 ([M + 1 + 18
the mixture. At the indicated time, the product was partitioned + 41]+, 15.4%), 362 ([M + 18]+, 25.6%), 346 ([M + 2]+,
between 20 mL diethyl ether and 20 mL H2O. The ether layer 28.2%), 345 ([M + 1]+, 100%); APCI-MS (II): m/z (obs. frag-
was washed with 2 × 20 mL portions of 2% NaHCO3.
Chromatographic and instrumental methods. 1H and 13
NMR spectra were obtained as described previously (8).
ment, intensity), 362 ([M + 18]+, 16.0%), 346 ([M + 2]+,
28.0%), 345 ([M + 1]+, 100%); EI-MS (I): m/z (obs. frag-
ment, intensity), 308 ([M − 18 − 18]+, 0.9%), 295 ([M −
C
Epoxidized fatty methyl esters were analyzed by RP- 31(·OCH3) − 18]+, 1.1%), 277 ([M − 31 − 18 − 18]+, 0.9%),
HPLC. Solutions of the methyl esters in dichloromethane 187 ([HO=CHC6H12COOCH3]+, 100%), 157 ([M − 187]+,
were filtered through 13-mm, 0.45-µm syringe filters (PVDF; 23.7%), 155 ([187 − 32]+, 87.6%), 139 ([C8H16COOCH3 −
Scientific Resources, Eatontown, NJ). Dichloromethane was 32]+, 11.9%), 113 ([C7H12OH]+, 63.2%. EI-MS (II): m/z (obs.
removed under a stream of nitrogen, and the filtered products fragment, intensity), 308 ([M − 18 − 18]+, 1.3%), 295 ([M −
were dissolved in 1 mL isopropanol. Reaction mixtures were 31(·OCH3) − 18]+, 2.1%), 277 ([M − 31 − 18 − 18]+, 1.6%),
separated on two Symmetry 3.5 µm C18 reversed-phase 187 ([HO=CHC6H12COOCH3]+, 64.4%), 157 ([M − 187]+,
columns (150 × 2.1 mm and 50 × 2.1 mm) (Waters, Milford, 16.9%), 155 ([187 − 32]+, 100%), 139 ([C8H16COOCH3 −
MA) connected in series. Quantification of hydrolyzed epox- 32]+, 13.8%), 113 ([C7H12OH]+, 39.7%; APCI-MS (bis-TMS
ide products was made using a Varex MK III ELSD (Alltech, ether) (I): m/z (obs. fragment, intensity), 490 ([M + 2]+,
Deerfield, IL) operated at 55°C, and with N2 as the nebuliz- 46.7%), 489 ([M + 1]+, 100%), 417 ([M − TMSOH + 18 +
ing gas at a flow rate of 1.5 L/min. Mobile phase composition 1]+, 2.0%), 399 ([M − TMSOH + 1]+, 1.3%); APCI-MS (II):
and gradient were 0–5 min H2O/CH3CN (40:60, vol/vol); m/z (obs. fragment, intensity), 490 ([M + 2]+, 41.6%), 489
5–30 min H2O/CH3CN (40:60, vol/vol) to CH3CN (100); ([M + 1]+, 100%), 417 ([M − TMSOH + 18 + 1]+, 9.1%), 399
30–54 min CH3CN (100). The flow rate was 0.25 mL/min. ([M − TMSOH + 1]+, 2.6%); EI-MS (I): m/z (obs. fragment,
Products were characterized by HPLC with mass detection intensity), 315 ([M − C6H12OTMS]+, 2.6%), 259 ([M −
using EI-MS (Thermabeam Mass Detector; Waters) and at- TMSOC8H15COOCH3]+, 91.9%), 229 ([M − 259]+, 4.8%),
mospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) HPLC-MS 173 ([M − 315]+, 100%); EI-MS (II): m/z (obs. fragment, in-
(Micromass ZMD; Waters). The EI-MS detector was set to tensity), 315 ([M − C6H12OTMS]+, 1.1%), 259 ([M −
scan in the mass range of m/z 55–600 at 1000 amu/s and had TMSOC8H15COOCH3]+, 100%), 229 ([M − 259]+, 10.7%),
an ionization energy of 70 eV. Ionization source, nebulizer, 173 ([M − 315]+, 77.3%); NMR: (see Tables 1 and 2).
and expansion region temperatures were 200, 64, and 75°C,
respectively. When using the APCI-MS, the HPLC gradient
contained 0.1% formic acid, and the APCI-MS detector was
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
set to scan in the mass range of m/z 150–550 at 400 amu/s. Methyl 9,10-epoxyoctadecanoate 1 was prepared from oleic
The corona, cone, and extractor voltages were 3700, 20, and acid. Monoepoxide 1 was exposed to alumina, and analysis
5 eV, respectively. The source and APCI heater temperatures by RP-HPLC showed that a single product was formed that
were 150 and 400°C, respectively.
had an RT of 18.2 min. The MS data and the 1H and 13C NMR
Structural confirmation of hydrolysis products. (i) Methyl spectra given in the Materials and Methods section show that
threo-9,10-dihydroxyoctadecanoate (2). Retention time (RT): a 1,2-diol was formed with hydroxy groups on C-9 and C-10.
18.2 min; IR: 3280 (hydroxy), 1702 (carbonyl) cm−1; APCI- Furthermore, comparison of the carbon and proton shifts with
JAOCS, Vol. 80, no. 9 (2003)