of carbonyl group with DAST is a common method for the
introduction of a gem-difluoromethylene group, very few
sterically hindered five-membered cyclic ketones have been
difluorinated by DAST.10 Recently, we have reported the
preparation of 3-deoxy-3,3-difluoro-D-arabinofuranose from
gem-difluorohomoallyl alcohol 3.11 We envisioned that the
gem-difluoromethylenated diol 13 could be a suitable precur-
sor for compound 15. Compound 13 can be derived from
the chiral gem-difluorohomoallyl alcohol 3 through dihy-
droxylation and followed by ring closure and opening. The
absolute configuration of the target compound could be
controlled by performing the synthesis in an enantioselective
fashion.
Figure 1. Rationale for the design of the target compound 1.
Therefore, what interests us most is to synthesize a new
type of 3TC analogue by replacing the oxygen with a
difluoromethylene group (CF2) on the basis of the bioisosteric
rationale (Figure 1). This is because the carbocyclic nucleo-
side analogues have more stable glycosidic bonds, which can
be of advantage to antiviral agents. Notably, the gem-di-
fluoromethylene has been considered as an isopolar-isosteric
substitute for oxygen.7 Additionally, the introduction of fluor-
ine atoms to a nucleoside may enhance its clinical efficacy
by altering drug metabolism and lipophilicity.8 However, as
far as we know, the synthesis of 6′,6′-difluoronucleoside is
extremely difficult, which has impeded the investigation of
structure-activity relationships (SARs) and their develop-
ment as clinical agents. Therefore, new and practical syn-
thetic methods are needed. Herein, a route to synthesize 2′,3′-
dideoxy-6′,6′-difluoro-3′-thionucleoside 1 is described.
Our retrosynthetic analysis (Scheme 1) was based on the
idea that the target molecule 1 could be derived from the
The gem-difluorohomoallyl alcohol 3 was obtained through
the coupling of gem-difluoroallylindium, generated from
3-bromo-3,3-difluoropropene and indium in DMF, with
1-(R)-glyceraldehyde acetonide 2 in 90% yield (Scheme 2).12
Scheme 2
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of 1
The ratio of anti/syn compound 3 is 7.7:1 determined by
19F NMR. The difluoromethylene group in anti-3 appeared
at a higher field than that in syn-3 in 19F NMR spectra.
Notably, the anti-3 isomer is our desired compound. Then,
compound 3 was treated with trifluoromethanesulfonic an-
hydride in dichloromethane at -25 °C to afford the corre-
sponding triflate 4. Subsequent treatment of compound 4 with
sodium azide in DMF at room temperature provided com-
pound 5. However, the reduction of the azide 5 was not easy
to accomplish. Initial attempts to obtain the amide 7 through
the reduction of compound 5 with LiAlH4 and then direct
protection of reduced product by tert-butoxycarbonyl group
failed. Fortunately, by using Ph3P as a reducing agent instead
of LiAlH4 in THF, our desired amine syn-6 was obtained in
62% overall yield from alcohol 3. The syn-6 could be easily
separated through column chromatography.
precursor of type 15 by building a base moiety at the C1
position through the procedure of Shaw and Warrener.9
However, construction of the special backbone of 15,
especially the introduction of a gem-difluoromethylene group
to the C4 position, is very difficult. Although the fluorination
However, to our surprise, the protection of amine syn-6
with di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (Boc2O) in a common way
afforded protected amide 7 in poor yield (16-29%, entries
1-3) together with byproduct 8 (Table 1). In addition, the
more equivalents of Et3N used, the lower the yield of product
(6) For reviews, see: (a) Crimmins, M. T. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 9229.
(b) Ferrero, M.; Goto, V. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 4319.
(7) (a) Blackburn, G. M.; England, D. A.; Kolkmann, F. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1981, 930. (b) Blackburn, G. M.; Brown, D.; Martin, S.
J. J. Chem. Res., Synop. 1985, 92. (c) Blackburn, G. M.; Eckstein, F.; Kent,
D. E.; Perree, T. D. Nucleosides Nucleotides 1985, 4, 165.
(8) For recent examples, see: (a) Zhou, W.; Gumina, G.; Chong, Y.;
Wang, J.; Schinazi, R. F.; Chu, C. K. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3399. (b)
Zhu, W.; Chong, Y.; Choo, H.; Mathews, J.; Schinazi, R.; Chu, C. K. J.
Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1631. (c) Dai, Q.; Piccirilli, J. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
807. (d) Gumina, G.; Schinazi, R. F.; Chu, C. K. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46,
3245. (e) Lee, K.; Choi, Y.; Gumina, G.; Zhou, W.; Schinazi, R. F.; Chu,
C. K. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 1313.
(10) Gumian, G.; Schinazi, R. F.; Chu, C. K. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4177
and references cited therein.
(11) Zhang, X.; Xia, H.; Dong, X.; Jin, J.; Meng, W.; Qing, F.-L. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9026.
(12) Kirihara, M.; Takuwa, T.; Takizawa, S.; Momose, T.; Nemoto, H.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 827.
(9) Shaw, G.; Warrener, R. N. J. Chem. Soc. 1958, 157.
3942
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 22, 2004